09.01.2013 Views

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Palestine preaching the good news, wrote an apocryphal book, known as the Gospel of<br />

Barnabas. It was accepted as a canonical gospel in the Alexandrian churches until 325 AD, when<br />

the Nicene Council ordered all copies of it to be destroyed, and anyone who had it in there<br />

possession was to be put to death.<br />

In the 5th century, a copy, written in his own hand, was found lying on his chest, in his tomb<br />

in Cyprus, which made its way into the library of Pope Sixtus V (1585-1590) and was made<br />

available by a monk named Frater Marino.<br />

Though there is no major deviation from the authorized gospels, one subtle difference<br />

appeared in the Sermon on the Mount, which seems to indicate that the account which in written<br />

in Matthew may have been embellished, to make it sound better. Barnabas writes: ““Blessed are<br />

they that mourn this earthly life, for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the poor who truly hate<br />

the delights of the world, for they shall abound in the delights of the Kingdom of God. Blessed<br />

are they that eat at the table of God, for the angels shall minister unto them.”<br />

Polycarp, author of a letter to the Philippians, wrote about the first three Gospels, but not the<br />

fourth, because it didn’t exist, and it wasn’t mentioned until 180 by Theophilus of Antioch. John<br />

has come to be regarded as the most accurate of the Gospels, even though it is believed to have<br />

been written over a period of years by theologians, at the Greek city of Ephesus, who in 100 AD,<br />

sought to fill the void in the <strong>contents</strong> of the other three. John has the risen Jesus being seen by<br />

only Mary Magdalene, where in other books, other women accompanied her; and also singles her<br />

out as being a primary mourner. This hint at a more intimate relationship has given rise to a<br />

theory as to the actual role that Mary had in the life of Jesus. In the other three gospels, the Last<br />

Supper is portrayed as a Passover meal, after which Jesus was crucified; however in John, the<br />

crucifixion occurred before the Passover, whereby John puts more emphasis on the foot washing<br />

that occurred. This discrepancy had been explained by saying that John was using the lunar<br />

calendar, while the others were using the solar calendar, however, it is now believed that John’s<br />

purpose was to present Jesus as the Passover Lamb of the Jews, who is killed as their sacrifice.<br />

Where in Luke, only Peter goes to inspect the tomb; in John, it was Peter and John. Critics claim<br />

that the story of Doubting Thomas (John 20:19-31) wasn’t true, based on the premise that Jesus<br />

was tied to the cross, rather than nailed. Some have even claimed that there was “no historical<br />

proof that he (John) ever existed.”<br />

Simon Peter, the “Rock” upon whom Jesus said He would build His church, was believed to<br />

be the first to ‘see’ Jesus after the resurrection, and it was through his efforts that the philosophy<br />

of Christianity was perpetuated. The primary contention is that the New Testament was doctored<br />

to present Jesus as being divine. Because Jesus was not of the priestly tribe of the Levites, it was<br />

necessary to validate His claims so that He would be accepted by the early Christians. In the<br />

Book of Hebrews, completed before the fall of Rome around 68, Jesus was described as being a<br />

perfect priest after the order of Melchizedek, who in Genesis was referred to as a priest of the<br />

most high God, yet neither was he a Levite. The Book of Hebrews, said to be written by Paul,<br />

also refers to the presence of Jesus in Heaven, but never refers to a physical resurrection.<br />

Books such as Forgotten Worlds by Robert Charroux (1971), and Resurrection: Myth or<br />

Reality? by John Shelby Spong (1994), have questioned the authenticity of the Bible. In a 1977<br />

book, called The Myth of God Incarnate, 7 scholars and professors from prominent American<br />

seminaries seriously questioned whether Jesus was Lord, and said that the Bible should be<br />

updated by having all traces of the deity of Jesus removed. They said that Jesus didn’t claim to<br />

be divine, but was promoted to that status by early Christians who were under pagan influences.<br />

Another book, The Five Gospels: What Did Jesus Really Say?, a report by 77 Biblical scholars,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!