contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

gun-control lobby in this country. The first step was to use the media to create a clamor for gun
control in this country, and this would in turn sway the opinion of a large portion of the
population to support such a measure. The second step would be the initiation of gun control
legislation that would establish annual licensing fees, and surcharges on ammunition. After two
years, the third step would involve a massive increase in the licensing fees. The reason given,
would be because of the costs involved to enforce the law, when in fact, it would be to
discourage ownership. The failure to get a license would result in a $1,000 fine and/or six
months in jail; and if your license lapses, your failure to turn your guns over to the government,
would result in a $15,000 fine and/or eighteen months in jail. Both instances also result in the
loss of the right to own a firearm.
After two more years, the fourth step would call for further legislation to increase the
licensing fees even more. Their ultimate goal “is to reduce the number of licensees to zero.” In
this way, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States will be circumvented
in order to take the guns out of the hands of the American people. After that, the population will
be defenseless against government forces. They hoped to accomplish this within 15 years. Noah
Webster said in 1787: “Before a standing army or a tyrannical government can rule, the people
must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.”
There was a law passed that tells us what the mentality of the government is concerning this
issue. On September 26, 1961, Public Law 87-297 or “The Arms Control and Disarmament Act”
was signed. It created the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency as an “agency of peace
to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world
disarmament.” Section 3(a) describes disarmament as the “control, reduction, or elimination, of
armed forces and armaments of all kinds.” Section 31(a) indicates that the Agency is to engage
in study and research to achieve the “limitation, reduction, control, and elimination of armed
forces and armaments...” This information can be found in the United States Code, Volume 9,
Title 22 (Foreign Relations), Chapter 35 (Arms Control and Disarmament), Sections 2551-2595.
Even though the Agency is active in negotiations regarding foreign policy, you can be sure that
all such negotiations include the same concessions for America.
In the February 14, 1963 edition of the Washington Report, Congressman James B. Utt said
that this “Disarmament Act sets up a super-agency with power greater than the power of
Congress, which delegated it. The law was almost a duplication, word for word, of a
disarmament proposal by the Kremlin in 1959 ... The Disarmament legislation was passed for the
purpose of implementing the Department of State Publication 7277, entitled Freedom from War -
The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”
Will the U.S. military go against American citizens if so ordered by the Federal Government?
It was reported that a 46-question survey was handed out in May, 1994, to “300 randomly
selected” Marines (veterans of the Panama operation and the Persian Gulf War) at the
Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Base in the Mohave Desert about 70 miles east of San
Bernadino, California. The soldiers were asked for their reaction to various statements, such as
U.S. military troops being commanded by UN officers, whether the President “has the authority
to pass his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the UN Secretary-General,” and if they
would serve in a United Nations military force to “maintain world peace.” The survey was
concluded with this: “The U.S. Government declares a ban on the possession, sale,
transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is
permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a
number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement: I