09.01.2013 Views

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

our nation over to a Socialist world government. In Hutchin’s 1947 book, The Constitutional<br />

Foundations for World Order (published for the Foundation for World Order), he says:<br />

“Tinkering with the United Nations will not help us, if we agree with the New York Times that<br />

our only hope is in the ultimate abolition of war through an ultimate world government.”<br />

President Dwight D. Eisenhower said on October 31, 1956: “I am more deeply convinced that<br />

the United Nations represents the soundest hope for peace in the world.”<br />

A State Department document, #7277, called Freedom From War: The United States’<br />

Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, revealed a plan to disarm<br />

the U.S. military, shut down bases, and to give the UN control of our Armed Forces, and nuclear<br />

weapons. The UN military arm would then be the world’s police force to act as “peacekeepers.”<br />

The document, which on September 1, 1961, was sent by courier to the UN Secretary General,<br />

suggested a “progressive reduction of the war-making capability of the nations and the<br />

simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the<br />

peace...” It was to be done through a three-step program:<br />

“The first stage would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage war by<br />

reducing the armed forced of the nations ... nuclear capabilities would be reduced by<br />

treaties ... and UN peace-keeping powers would be strengthened ... The second stage<br />

would provide further substantial reductions in the armed forces and the establishment of<br />

a permanent international peace force within the United Nations ... The third stage would<br />

have the nations retaining only those forces required for maintaining internal order, but<br />

the United States would provide manpower for the United Nations Peace Force.”<br />

The plan called for “all weapons of mass destruction” to be eliminated, except for “those<br />

required for a United Nations Peace Force” (page 12, 1st paragraph); and (on page 16, 8th<br />

paragraph) to “keep the peace, all states will reaffirm their obligations under the UN Charter to<br />

refrain from the threat of use of any type armed force.” I’m sure that this includes the disarming<br />

of American citizens. Sarah Brady, one of the leading proponents in this country against<br />

handguns, said: “Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who<br />

would resist us have been totally disarmed.” Sen. Joseph S. Clark of Pennsylvania said during a<br />

March 1, 1962 debate on the Senate floor, that the program is “the fixed, determined, and<br />

approved policy of the government of the United States.” The Program was later revised in The<br />

Blueprint for the Peace Race, which said on page 33: “...the Parties to the Treaty would<br />

progressively strengthen the United Nations Police Force ... until it had sufficient armed forces<br />

and armaments so that no state could challenge it.” The Program was again revised by the<br />

present Outline of Basic Provisions of a Treaty on General and Complete Disarmament in a<br />

Peaceful World.<br />

In 1961, during the Kennedy administration, Robert McNamara, McGeorge Bundy and Dean<br />

Rusk (all CFR members), initiated a secret study to study the direct and indirect ramifications of<br />

war, and how they could control the economy during peace-time. They wanted to know what<br />

situations the United States would be exposed to in the world if it moved from a period of war to<br />

a time of permanent peace, or as the Report said, “to consider the problems involved in the<br />

contingency of a transition to a general condition of peace, and to recommend procedures for<br />

dealing with this contingency.” Conceivably, it would look for ways to slowly move this country<br />

into the New World Order. By 1963, fifteen experts (known as the SSG or Special Study Group)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!