contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

possible.” On October 7, 1961 People’s World, a West Coast Communist Party newspaper,
published an editorial, “Save the UN,” which said: “The UN commands a great reservoir of
support in our country ... People should write President Kennedy, telling him- do not withdraw
from the UN, restore the UN to the Grand Design of Franklin Roosevelt- the design for peaceful
coexistence.” The Preamble to the Constitution of the U.S. Communist Party, urges the
“strengthening of the United Nations as a universal instrument of peace.”
The Preamble of the UN Charter says: “We the people of the United Nations, determined to
save succeeding generations from the scourge of war...” In light of this, you should be aware of
what Albert Einstein said after the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6,
1945: “The secret of the bomb should be committed to a World Government and the U.S.A.
should announce its readiness to give it to a World Government.”
According to the Congressional Record of June 7, 1949, on pages 7356 and 7357, this was
the wording for HCR64, a joint resolution (corresponds to Senate Concurrent Resolution 56, the
Tobey or ‘World Federalist’ Resolution) that was introduced in the House of Representatives:
“Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring) that it is the sense of the
Congress that it should be a fundamental objective of the foreign policy of the United States to
support and strengthen the United Nations and to seek its development into a world federation,
open to all nations, with defined and limited powers adequate to preserve peace and prevent
aggression through the enactment, interpretation and enforcement of world law.” Concerning this
Resolution, Cord Meyer, chairman of the National Executive Committee of the United World
Federalists, said at a hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on the United Nations Charter:
“We in the United States would be declaring our willingness to join with other nations in
transferring to the UN constitutional authority to administer and enforce law that was binding on
national governments and their individual citizens.”
By February, 1950, after the public expressed their outrage over the Resolution, the Liberals
who sponsored it turned their backs on it in an attempt to salvage their political reputations. Rep.
Bernard W. Kearney (R-New York) said: “We signed the Resolution believing we were
sponsoring a movement to set up a stronger power within the United Nations for world peace ...
Then we learned that various organizations were working on state legislatures and on peace
movements for world government action under which the entire U.S. Government would be
submerged in a super world government ... Perhaps we should have read the fine print in the first
place. We do not intend to continue in the role of sponsors of any movement which undermine
U.S. sovereignty. Many Congressmen feel as I do. We will make our position thoroughly clear.”
Within two years, 18 of the 23 states which had passed the Resolution eventually rescinded it.
Information about HCR64 / SCR56 can be found in the infamous Document No. 87, Review
of the United Nations Charter: A Collection of Documents, by the Senate Subcommittee on the
United Nations Charter, and published by the Government Printing Office in 1954. It was
reportedly given to each of the Senators at the time, and only two copies now remain in
existence. This report blows the lid off of the U.S. Government’s determination for one-world
government. Also discussed are Senate Resolution 133, introduced July 8, 1949 by Sen.
Sparkman (Democrat from Alabama) who said: “We can create now, with Russia if possible,
without Russia if necessary an overwhelming collective front open to all nations under a law just
to all.” The report urged (p. 846): “American atomic, military, and economic superiority is only
temporary. It is essential before that superiority is lost that there be created an international
organization with strength to enforce the peace.” Senate Concurrent Resolution 57, introduced
July 26, 1949 by Sen. Kefauver (D-Tennessee) called for an Atlantic Union of Canada, England,