09.01.2013 Views

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The second chapter of Daniel, which refers to the dream of Nebuchadnezzar, clearly points out<br />

that the ten toes (kingdoms) are an extension of the previous world empire, or Rome, which<br />

would then encompass all of the countries that fell within the boundaries of the Holy Roman<br />

Empire: parts of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya; Egypt; part of Saudi Arabia; Jordan,<br />

Israel, Syria, and Turkey; Portugal, Spain, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, part of the<br />

Netherlands, England, part of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Greece, part of Hungary,<br />

part of Yugoslavia, part of Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Albania, Slovenia, Croatia, and<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina.<br />

Let’s look at the ten horns or kingdoms, which many initially thought was represented by the<br />

original Common Market countries of France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands,<br />

Luxembourg, England, Denmark, Ireland, and Greece. The impact of the theory was lessened<br />

upon the later addition of Spain, Portugal, and Austria, which made a total of thirteen nations in<br />

what is now called the European Union. However, some still tried to make the argument, because<br />

Denmark and Ireland were not part of the Roman Empire.<br />

Another fact that supports the theory that the ten kings symbolically represent the area of<br />

western Europe is that there are only ten kingdoms, or monarchies now in western Europe:<br />

Belgium, Denmark, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden,<br />

and the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland; Great Britain– England, Wales, Scotland).<br />

Another confirming theory emanates from Daniel 9:26 which says: “...the people of the<br />

prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary...” The people that destroyed<br />

Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD were the Romans. Revelation 14:8 says: “Babylon<br />

(sometimes perceived as a symbolic name for Rome) is fallen, that great city, because she made<br />

all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.”<br />

According to Daniel 7:20, this leader of the eleventh country, will go against three of these<br />

nations, and defeat them. Yet, Revelation speaks of the ten kings pledging their allegiance to the<br />

Antichrist. Do these ten include the eleventh nation of the Antichrist? Will he defeat the three<br />

nations, and replace them in the federation with his, and two others? Or will the three defeated<br />

nations remain, under the leadership of the eleventh? What is the purpose for the Antichrist to go<br />

against these three nations? Is it because they were not originally part of the revived Holy Roman<br />

Empire; or if they were, what else could prompt him to attack these countries?<br />

This beckons the theory about the ten tribes that lived in the area of Rome. Three were<br />

defeated because they were Aryans who opposed the papacy– Herulians, Vandals, and<br />

Ostrogoths; while the other seven became the nations of western Europe– Visigoths, Franks,<br />

Anglo-Saxons, Sueves, Burgundians, Alamanni, and Alans. One possible clue is that these<br />

nations may be apprehensive about uniting behind the political leadership of the Antichrist. For<br />

example, when the European Community met in Maastricht, the Netherlands, in 1991, Great<br />

Britain and Denmark voted against the initiation of a common currency. Another theory that<br />

somebody e-mailed me, was that the three nations are Afghanistan (Media), Iraq (Babylon), and<br />

Iran (Persia), by virtue of the fact that the U.S. has occupied Afghanistan and Iraq.<br />

There are other theories concerning the origin of the Antichrist. Some researchers believe<br />

that he has to come from Greece, Turkey, Syria, or Egypt; but not one of the countries which<br />

make up the ten nation federation. That would eliminate Greece. Could this country be Syria. In<br />

Isaiah 10:5, 10:24, 14:25, 30:31, he is referred to as the “Assyrian.” In Micah 5:5 it says: “And<br />

this man shall be the peace, when the Assyrian shall come into our land: and when he shall tread<br />

in our palaces, then we shall raise against him...” The Aramaeans, a semi-nomadic people who<br />

migrated from the Arabian desert around the third century BC, into Syria and Mesopotamia, have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!