09.01.2013 Views

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the Global World System,” which was prepared by Directors Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard<br />

Pestel (part of the “Strategy for Survival Project”), which revealed the Club’s goal of dividing<br />

the world into ten political/economic regions (which have been equated to the 10 “Kingdoms” of<br />

Bible prophecy), which would unite the entire world under a single form of government. These<br />

regions are: North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Japan, Rest of Developed World,<br />

Latin America, Middle East, Rest of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and China. The same plan<br />

was published in a Club of Rome book called Mankind at the Turning Point, which said: “The<br />

solution of these crises can be developed only in a global context with full and explicit<br />

recognition of the emerging world system and on a long-term basis. This would necessitate,<br />

among other changes, a new world economic order and a global resources allocation system…”<br />

In 1976, they published RIO: Reshaping the International Order which called for a new<br />

international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.<br />

Howard T. Odum, a marine biologist at the University of Florida, who is a member of the<br />

Club of Rome, was quoted in the August, 1980 edition of Fusion magazine, as saying: “It is<br />

necessary that the United States cut its population by two-thirds within the next 50 years.” He<br />

didn’t say how this would be accomplished. Their 1972 book, The Limits to Growth (which sold<br />

12 million copies in 27 languages), dealt with the problem of worldwide overpopulation, and<br />

stated that “if the world’s consumption patterns and population growth continued at the same<br />

high rates of the time, the earth would strike its limits within a century.”<br />

During the Carter Administration, a task force was appointed to expand upon this report, and<br />

on July 24, 1980, a two-volume document called “Global 2000 Report,” which had been written<br />

by former Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance, was presented to President Carter, and then<br />

Secretary of State Edmund S. Muskie. It attempted to project global economic trends for the next<br />

twenty years, and indicated that the resources of the planet were not sufficient enough to support<br />

the expect dramatic increase in the world population. The report called for the population of the<br />

U.S. to be reduced by 100 million people by the year 2050.<br />

About six months later, the Council on Environmental Quality made recommendations based<br />

on the Report, called “Global Future: A Time to Act.” They suggested an aggressive program of<br />

population control which included sterilization, contraception and abortion. In August, 1982, the<br />

Executive Intelligence Review published a report called “Global 2000: Blueprint for Genocide”<br />

which said that the two aforementioned Presidential reports “are correctly understood as political<br />

statements of intent- the intent on the part of such policy centers as the Council on Foreign<br />

Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the International Monetary Fund, to pursue policies<br />

that will result not only in the death of the 120 million cited in the reports, but in the death of<br />

upwards of two billion people by the year 2000.”<br />

Peccei wrote (based on a report by COR member Harland Cleveland, U.S. Ambassador to<br />

NATO, who believed that Third World countries should decide for themselves who should be<br />

eliminated):<br />

“Damaged by conflicting policies of three major countries and blocs, roughly patched up<br />

here and there, the existing international economic order is visibly coming apart at the<br />

seams ... The prospect of the necessity of the recourse to triage deciding who must be<br />

saved is a very grim one indeed. But, if lamentably, events should come to such a pass,<br />

the right to make such decisions cannot be left to just a few nations because it would lend<br />

themselves to ominous power over life of the world's hungry.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!