17.01.2013 Views

Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gnarly4X<br />

(carpal tunnel)<br />

Thu Mar 03 2005<br />

10:19 AM<br />

Pulses from <strong>the</strong> intake valves opening and closing in a way are bad , but in ano<strong>the</strong>r way <strong>the</strong>y are good. Here is<br />

where technical dyno info is worthless. At higher rpm's , velocities take over.<br />

...Yeah, <strong>the</strong> engine is an air "pump", so it's going to "pulse". Dyno data is just a tool, like an A/F meter or flow bench.<br />

Quote:<br />

Biggest reason <strong>the</strong>y are downsizing engines now, just better efficiency.<br />

... nope, it's cost, perhaps efficiency is <strong>the</strong> second biggest reason.<br />

Quote:<br />

Very hard to do with an EFI system unless it's fully mapped<br />

... everything is a trade-off.<br />

Quote:<br />

Think about this . Years ago, back in <strong>the</strong> 60's Ferrari figured out that 4 44mm downdraft carbs would feed <strong>the</strong>ir V8's<br />

more efficiently and produced some huge horsepower numbers from very small displacements. The V12's <strong>the</strong>y built<br />

with 6 sidedrafts did even better.<br />

... Yes, and you had to sync <strong>the</strong> carbs every o<strong>the</strong>r day to make <strong>the</strong>m run right!<br />

Quote:<br />

I'm just aiming to make more use of what this engine is capable of flowing if forced to do so . Also looking into a<br />

supercharger, as soon as <strong>the</strong>y get re-released, lol .<br />

Yep.. it's only money.<br />

Quote:<br />

All I'm wanting to do is set up two <strong>32</strong>/36 DGV's onto this twin sidedraft manifold. This will allow better cruise blends<br />

with <strong>the</strong> two <strong>32</strong>mm primaries since <strong>the</strong>y are metered for economy . This would provide a better torque curve over a<br />

single <strong>32</strong>/36 but not as radical metering as <strong>the</strong> 38DGAS. Then, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> added bonus of <strong>the</strong> 36mm secondaries.<br />

The fun part would be setting up <strong>the</strong> linkage, although not much of a challenge since I've done much worse things<br />

on engines lately. Just getting <strong>the</strong> two primaries balanced and having to adjust <strong>the</strong> secondaries to open exactly <strong>the</strong><br />

same to keep all four cylinders balanced would be <strong>the</strong> hardest. The pulse delay you speak of would be taken care of<br />

since <strong>the</strong> small plenum area below <strong>the</strong> DGV in that adapter will cover that aspect.<br />

Yep, "torque" is what I'd be looking for. So, what are you waiting for?<br />

Gnarls.<br />

Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />

Here ya go...<br />

1,000 foot elevation, 80d F ambient intake, 91 octane fuel, RH=29.76, Dew Point 37d F.<br />

20R, <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/36, 2.25" exhaust, Header, Stock Toy cam<br />

2000 RPM - 108 brake tq, 40.9 brake HP<br />

2450 RPM - 120, 55.9<br />

2900 RPM - 128, 70.6<br />

3350 RPM - 136, 86.6<br />

3800 RPM - 130, 94.4<br />

4250 RPM - 126, 102<br />

4700 RPM - 122, 110<br />

5150 RPM - 112, 110<br />

5600 RPM - 99.3, 106<br />

6050 RPM - 86.9, 100<br />

20R, Stock<br />

2000 RPM - 107 brake tq, 40.7 brake HP<br />

2450 RPM - 118, 54.9<br />

2900 RPM - 122, 67.2<br />

3350 RPM - 122, 78.0<br />

3800 RPM - 121, 87.5<br />

4250 RPM - 117, 94.6<br />

4700 RPM - 111, 99.2<br />

5150 RPM - 97.8, 95.9<br />

11 of 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!