You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
yodta<br />
(pooh bah)<br />
Thu Apr 14 2005<br />
07:25 PM<br />
Sarge<br />
(carpal tunnel)<br />
Fri Apr 15 2005<br />
03:21 AM<br />
yodta<br />
(pooh bah)<br />
Fri Apr 15 2005<br />
01:42 PM<br />
venturis. The 4.5's larger outside diameter also forces a better signal to <strong>the</strong> main circuit since <strong>the</strong> outside bore is closer to <strong>the</strong><br />
main venturi's diamter.<br />
There really is nothing wrong with <strong>the</strong> jetting you had before or <strong>the</strong> F50 tube. It only required that jetting to work with what you<br />
have , no big deal . The F6 is pretty extreme in richening <strong>the</strong> circuit at low end. If you can't run a significantly smaller idle jet <strong>the</strong>n<br />
you are pretty much stuck with that size. The only o<strong>the</strong>r way around this is to reshape <strong>the</strong> plenum under <strong>the</strong> carb to increase flow<br />
to <strong>the</strong> outside where <strong>the</strong> transition dumps.<br />
Try <strong>the</strong> F50's jetting and note it's response. Then try <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Ftubes with that jetting. I'll have to look up that o<strong>the</strong>r F tube you<br />
ordered and see what it's map looks like. There should be one close enough to <strong>the</strong> F50 to respond <strong>the</strong> way you want it to without<br />
any lag.<br />
As far as suppliers, I have over a dozen. Pierce is one of my favorites in <strong>the</strong> US , o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> best ones are overseas but it<br />
takes extra time.<br />
Sarge<br />
Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />
Quote:<br />
This is just a lack of signal, probably from <strong>the</strong> intake having a bit too large of an internal runner diameter.<br />
Offenhauser typically runs pretty large runner bores to help larger valves and high compression work like it should .<br />
As a result <strong>the</strong> air moves slower, but more volume. The speed of <strong>the</strong> air going through <strong>the</strong> carb's venturi is <strong>the</strong> signal<br />
<strong>the</strong> carb recieves.<br />
I should note here that <strong>the</strong> Offy intake I'm using is <strong>the</strong> dual plane manifold; <strong>the</strong> runners for <strong>the</strong> primary and secondary barrels are<br />
isolated. this intake is advertised as designed for providing better low end torque and throttle response. my understanding is that<br />
dual plane manifold designs are <strong>the</strong> "opposite" of oversized manifold runners, in that <strong>the</strong> air should move faster and more<br />
violently than those open plenum designs.<br />
I believe <strong>the</strong> venturis in this carb are 26mm & 27mm. I was trying to find a picture to corroborate this, but I can't seem to turn it<br />
up. I'll check <strong>the</strong> stamps on <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> carb body again to make sure.<br />
I will revert to <strong>the</strong> jetting I was running that was crispest before <strong>the</strong> tube swap and play with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r tubes over <strong>the</strong> next couple<br />
of days and make notes.<br />
how about we lay out some guidelines for testing, like throttle positions, load, etc. so we're testing and comparing <strong>the</strong> same thing<br />
on each change.<br />
as I mentioned in a previous post, <strong>the</strong> F81 is identical to <strong>the</strong> F50 tube except it has two more small holes at <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> fat<br />
section of <strong>the</strong> tube. you can see what I'm talking about in one of <strong>the</strong> e-tube diagram images 17 posts up. look at <strong>the</strong> diagram with<br />
<strong>the</strong> F6 & F50 marked on it and <strong>the</strong>n in <strong>the</strong> chart to <strong>the</strong> right. <strong>the</strong> F81 is just below <strong>the</strong> F50 in <strong>the</strong> second group.<br />
Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />
Wait a minute, just exactly how are those runners in <strong>the</strong> manifold oriented? Is <strong>the</strong>re a common plenum at all or not?<br />
Testing really should be done on maybe a daily commute route or somewhere that usually drive in basically <strong>the</strong> same conditions.<br />
It's pretty hard to get control points from day to day but at least if <strong>the</strong> route is consistent it helps .<br />
Sarge<br />
Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />
no common plenum at all. <strong>the</strong>re are two holes at <strong>the</strong> carb mounting surface on <strong>the</strong> manifold, and <strong>the</strong> aluminum spacer <strong>the</strong>y<br />
provide has two holes, as well, so it keeps <strong>the</strong> barrels isolated <strong>the</strong> whole way down. <strong>the</strong> runner divider inside <strong>the</strong>m manifold is<br />
oriented horizontally, and I believe <strong>the</strong> secondary runner is on top of <strong>the</strong> primary at <strong>the</strong> head mounting flanges.<br />
ooh, I just thought of something. <strong>the</strong> insulating spacer I just ordered from pierce is an open plenum design. crap... wonder how<br />
that's gonna play in...<br />
yodta Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />
just got <strong>the</strong> garolite in today. holy crap is that stuff heavy! I don't know what I'm going to use to cut it, though. thought about <strong>the</strong><br />
rotozip, maybe, but not sure how tough this stuff is yet.<br />
41 of 88