Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

(pooh bah)
Sun Jun 19 2005
03:49 PM
built4thrashing
(Stranger)
Tue Jun 21 2005
08:08 AM
yodta
(pooh bah)
Tue Jun 21 2005
11:55 AM
Sarge
(carpal tunnel)
Wed Jun 22 2005
02:48 AM
built4thrashing
(Stranger)
Wed Jun 22 2005
09:47 AM
Sarge
(carpal tunnel)
Thu Jun 23 2005
01:16 AM
built4thrashing
(Stranger)
Thu Jun 23 2005
09:58 AM
oooh, yeah, I'd completely forgotten about those.
I really only used the F6.
I'll package 'em up and send 'em back.
PM me w/your address and I'll get them out this week.
I looked into vacuum timing a little bit months ago and had a couple of ideas for controlling the amount of vacuum, but couldn't
think of a way to fabricate the device I was considering.
I still wonder sometimes about the ignition curve of my distributor since it's vacuum controlled. you don't typically think of a
vacuum hose, its routing, or diameter as a calibrated device. I wonder just how much difference a few inches makes, or even the
diameter of the hose when you're talking fractions of an inch.
Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
hey guys first post but have been reading this discussion with great interest . I have a suzuki sierra with a weber on it and are
having trouble tuning it properly. i need to swap the e tubes i think. the e tubes that were in the carbys i got are F66 and a F93???
i could not find a F93 on the charts you posted. Want to know which would be better for the suzi what barel they should go in.
Also while on the Etubes what role do the holes play? what do high holes do and what do the low holes do and how does size of
hole effect it. just trying to understand how they work.
Thanx Jayson
Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
I'm sure Sarge will chime in here. he's got a lot of experience tuning them on suzukis.
is the sierra the same as the samurai here in the states?
Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
Generally, the Sami's use F50's in both sides, you can use the F6 in the secondary and a bit smaller main jet in the secondary as
well. This will help to give it a "kick" when opened up . Also, the number and size of the holes at the top of the tube govern initial
tip-in on the mains , holes at the bottom work to mix air at higher speeds . Orientation/angle of those holes also plays a big role .
There are no F93 tubes available for the DGV series , maybe the numbers got nicked up or something ....
Sarge
Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
sorry sarge i should have said the F93 e tube is out of a 34ADM weber thats used here on our early ford falcons.the only other
E-tubes i have are F66. One looks like it has had the holes made bigger. These are what most 4cly webers have over here. i
supose the one with the bigger holes should go in the secondary side??
the F66 is similar to the F50 with the holes high up but it only has 3. has less volume in hole sizes but. does less/smaller holes
make it richer or leaner.
been trying to find out how they effect the fuel delivery but cant find anything on the net
thankx
Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
The less air mixed , the more fuel basically. The F66 tube will be a bit richer on the bottom end and a bit leaner on the upper
range . I'd use that one in the primary to help override the problems with the Suzuki intake . That old 34ADM , is that one the
early style progressive with a vacuum secondary?
Sarge
Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
the 34adm has a mechanical secondary but has a thicker base with alot of vac tubes. i think it is a full polution model. it also has
an electric choke and the top is oval shaped for the air intake. if you want i could take some photos and email them to ya.
that F93 e-tube is similar to a F7. but it doesnt step out. it even has similar size holes.
yodta Re: Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES
56 of 88