17.01.2013 Views

Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

Weber 32/36DGV verses the Weber 38DGES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Stranger)<br />

Fri Jul 15 2005<br />

04:38 AM<br />

yodta<br />

(pooh bah)<br />

Fri Jul 15 2005<br />

12:43 PM<br />

yodta<br />

(pooh bah)<br />

Wed Aug 10 2005<br />

11:04 AM<br />

Sarge<br />

(carpal tunnel)<br />

Thu Aug 11 2005<br />

01:16 PM<br />

yodta<br />

(pooh bah)<br />

Thu Aug 11 2005<br />

02:44 PM<br />

Sarge<br />

(carpal tunnel)<br />

Sat Aug 13 2005<br />

01:31 PM<br />

Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />

hahaha, yeah, no doubt. get bounced out of a job, or just plain embarrass yourself at <strong>the</strong> very least.<br />

good.<br />

yeah, I was going to suggest <strong>the</strong> lean best idle procedure next for correct idle jet size verification.<br />

Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />

okay, a note on my stock air cleaner experiment...<br />

long story short, it sucked, or quite <strong>the</strong> opposite really -- it choked. Sarge, you were right, but I'm guessing you already knew I'd<br />

be back to post those results<br />

so, I plugged off all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r tubes, vacuum ports, inlets, etc., installed <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> to 22R air cleaner adapter, and fastened<br />

everything down. <strong>the</strong> first thing I noticed was that running was much quieter -- that rush of air you normally get with <strong>the</strong> open air<br />

filter elements was gone. I really liked this. it seemed to be a little bit more responsive in certain areas, mostly under light throttle,<br />

which I'm guessing is due to increased vacuum since <strong>the</strong> stock filter element was thicker, but it totally CHOKED at 3000rpm. I<br />

mean it felt like someone was pulling backwards on my tailgate as I was trying to accelerate!!<br />

it did have to be rejetted, but that was no big surprise, and <strong>the</strong> fuel economy actually dropped slightly even though I put in leaner<br />

jets.<br />

I liked that I was pulling in fresh air from <strong>the</strong> front of <strong>the</strong> vehicle. I've gotta figure out some way to rig that up for <strong>the</strong> Ram-flo.<br />

anyway, I put <strong>the</strong> Ram-flo back on a few days ago after running this experiment for a month or two. <strong>the</strong> choking problem was<br />

instantly corrected, and I just last night went back to <strong>the</strong> jetting I had in prior to <strong>the</strong> air cleaner swap, so all is well again.<br />

now I'm experimenting with that old LC Engineering mechanical distributor again. it's pinging a little on lugging conditions with <strong>the</strong><br />

timing set to 10* initial like LC says, so I can't be lazy about my shifting if I want to use it, but <strong>the</strong> secondary is oh so nice...<br />

might need to tighten up on <strong>the</strong> primary circuit a little bit, though.<br />

<strong>the</strong>re's something not quite right about <strong>the</strong> stock vacuum advance ignition curve, so <strong>the</strong> mechanical distributor seems to run a<br />

little more consistently than <strong>the</strong> distributor with <strong>the</strong> vacuum advance. I wish I could find a stock ignition curve chart though so I<br />

could see what's supposed to happen. I can't seem to make sense of <strong>the</strong> data in <strong>the</strong> FSM.<br />

more on this later...<br />

Sarge, how's <strong>the</strong> 22R DCNF project coming along?<br />

Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />

O<strong>the</strong>r than sourcing some brass heavy wall tubing , it's actually about done . The addition of <strong>the</strong> vacuum advance port to <strong>the</strong> carb<br />

is a total pain , but I'll get <strong>the</strong>re . If nothing else, I figure it's a necessity for those that don't want to spend <strong>the</strong> extra dough for <strong>the</strong><br />

mechanical disty. Honestly, I can't wait to test it out on a local truck here....<br />

Sarge<br />

Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />

I'm finding that <strong>the</strong> mechanical distributor is making for better overall response. <strong>the</strong>re's something off about <strong>the</strong> ignition curve<br />

using <strong>the</strong> vac. advances, both toge<strong>the</strong>r or separately.<br />

I think <strong>the</strong> thing to do here is figure out <strong>the</strong> ignition curve and recurve <strong>the</strong> stock one to use without vacuum advance.<br />

it idles fine at 10*, but I'm getting a little pinging I need to figure out. I don't want to fatten <strong>the</strong> fuel because it's doing well right<br />

now, and if I take down <strong>the</strong> base timing it might not be as responsive.<br />

final tuning is all going to boil down to timing though, I think.<br />

Re: <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>32</strong>/<strong>36DGV</strong> <strong>verses</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>38DGES</strong><br />

Before committing to adding <strong>the</strong> advance ports, I do have a plan to address <strong>the</strong> timing issues . One, <strong>the</strong> stock disty will be used<br />

with no vacuum advances . The low speed spring will be replaced with a bit heavier unit to keep total advance down to around<br />

20* or so with <strong>the</strong> initial timing set to around 14-16* . This will bring <strong>the</strong> disty up to a more balanced reaction to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Weber</strong> since it<br />

is so different in fuel curves compared to <strong>the</strong> stock carbs. May end up having to offer a modified disty along with <strong>the</strong> carb kits for<br />

60 of 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!