Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The first frame <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the shots in the bedchamber sequence from<br />
section 3 had handwritten numbers on them; these numbers had been<br />
scratched directly on the image, not on blank frames preceding it.<br />
Cutting them out meant losing one frame <strong>of</strong> not-terribly defective<br />
image from each shot; leaving them in place, however, produced so<br />
much flicker that after some deliberation, we ended up deciding to<br />
remove them.<br />
Only in the fragment from section 6, where the shots were clearly out<br />
<strong>of</strong> order and several <strong>of</strong> them evidently retakes did we do any actual<br />
editing. The final result is basically guesswork. We started from the title<br />
list, which gave some indication <strong>of</strong> the overall development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
scene: first, Smokehat measures the scullery maids to see if any <strong>of</strong><br />
them fit the wedding dress; then, the Prince enters; the Princess is<br />
measured, is found to be the right size, and the Prince orders her to be<br />
led away; finally, Smokehat flirts with and proposes to Bolette, one <strong>of</strong><br />
the maids.<br />
In a few places, where short sequences are missing, freeze-frames were<br />
made and inserted to clarify who is speaking.<br />
The Duplication: Digital Intermediate<br />
The duplication <strong>of</strong> the film was performed using a digital intermediate<br />
process.<br />
As mentioned above, the film elements were first transferred in<br />
standard definition in order to use an AVID editing suite. The resulting<br />
edit decision list (EDL) from the AVID editing suite was then imported<br />
into an Inferno effects workstation for the high definition film work. A<br />
high definition (2K, 1920x1440) scan <strong>of</strong> the film on a Spirit datacine was<br />
imported and conformed to the EDL and the film was assembled in<br />
reels prior to being re-recorded back to 35 mm black and white negative<br />
stock (2238) on an Arrilaser film recorder. From the new negative a few<br />
35 mm prints (5302) were produced for cinema use. A digital betacam<br />
tape video master was produced from the down-scaled 2K data and a<br />
17 fps videomaster created from this was used for the subsequent DVD<br />
release.<br />
The choice <strong>of</strong> a digital intermediate duplication process was two-fold.<br />
Since the basis <strong>of</strong> the restoration was a duplicate positive, already two<br />
duplication stages away from the original prints it derived from, it was<br />
decided to minimize further analogue duplication stages. Also, the<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> edits required, some only omitting single or very few<br />
frames, required very good preview facilities, which the AVID editing<br />
station allowed, while a conventional negative edit would invariably<br />
have fallen short in precision and flexibility.<br />
Der var engang is available on DVD through the Danish <strong>Film</strong> Institute,<br />
http://eshop.dfi.dk<br />
36 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong> / 67 / 2004