2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Saturday, April 14 – 12:45 pm – 2:20 pm<br />
1-103 ROUNDTABLE: STUDYING GENDER AND<br />
POLITICS OVER TIME: RESEARCH QUESTIONS<br />
AND STRATEGIES (Co-sponsored with Gender and<br />
Politics, see 28-103)<br />
Room Red Lacquer, 4 th Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Kira Sanbonmatsu, Rutgers University<br />
Panelist Maryann Barakso, American University<br />
Karen Beckwith, Case Western Reserve University<br />
Corrine McConnaughy, University of Texas, Austin<br />
Pamela Paxton, Ohio State University<br />
Gretchen Ritter, University of Texas, Austin<br />
Aili M. Tripp, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />
Overview: Panelists on this roundtable will discuss research<br />
questions and methods for analyzing gender and politics over<br />
time.<br />
2-12 PARTY POLARIZATION, PARTY CONVERGENCE<br />
IN DEVELOPED DEMOCRACIES<br />
Room Salon 1, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Eric C. Browne, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee<br />
Paper Polarization and <strong>Political</strong> Stability in Multiparty Systems<br />
(1945-1998)<br />
Zeev Maoz, University of California, Davis<br />
Zeynep Somer, University of Califonia, Davis<br />
Overview: We argue that low levels of political polarization make<br />
cabinet shifts more likely. We use a new measure of polarization<br />
derived from social networks analysis. This measure combines<br />
ideological distances between parties with the number of seats.<br />
Paper What's Left of the Left? Party Politics and Economic<br />
Globalization<br />
Stephen C. Nelson, Cornell University<br />
Overview: This paper investigates claims about the shifting<br />
ideological position of mainstream left parties in OECD countries.<br />
Using cross-section time series data from party manifestos, I argue<br />
that globalization does not explain Left party shifts.<br />
Paper Party Polarization in OECD Countries. Developments and<br />
Determinants<br />
Philipp Rehm, Duke University<br />
Overview: How did (societal and party) polarization develop in<br />
OECD countries in the last few decades? What explains the<br />
observed differences? The paper presents new measures and new<br />
data and explores determinants of polarization in comparative<br />
perspective.<br />
Paper The Construction of Economic Facts: Labour Neoliberalism in<br />
the Antipodes<br />
Jonathan Swarts, Purdue University, North Central<br />
Overview: This paper examines neoliberalism under Australian<br />
and New Zealand Labour as a discursive construction of political<br />
elites. It argues that the discourse of “objective” economic “facts”<br />
was fundamentally a strategic, contestable political strategy.<br />
Disc. Eric C. Browne, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee<br />
3-11 INEQUALITY AND EDUCATION<br />
Room Salon 2, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Christian Ponce de Leon, University of Chicago<br />
Paper <strong>Political</strong> Determinants of Public Expenditure Between Levels<br />
of Education<br />
Marco A. Fernandez, Duke University<br />
Overview: The study of the impact of political regimes over<br />
education spending has put little attention to the tradeoffs<br />
politicians face when they allocate resources among different<br />
education levels. In this paper I test several political economy<br />
hypothesis regard<br />
Paper How Governments Decide to Make Human Capital<br />
Stephen Kosack, Yale University<br />
Overview: In this paper, I construct a theory that governments<br />
provide education systems entirely based on specific political<br />
calculations, not economic or other welfare considerations, and<br />
test it in 3 carefully-selected countries: Taiwan, Ghana, and Brazil.<br />
Paper Democracy and Education Spending<br />
Amy H. Liu, Emory University<br />
Overview: I review the democracies-spend-more-on-education<br />
claim by directly testing two mechanisms. The results suggest it is<br />
not democracy per se that matters but rather the participation costs<br />
for society and the entry barriers for challengers.<br />
Paper Democracy and Inequality: Elections and Redistribution in<br />
Brazil<br />
Fabiana V. P. Machado, University of Rochester<br />
Overview: This study argues that both poverty and inequality may<br />
hinder the demand for forms of redistribution that are viewed as<br />
effective in ameliorating these very conditions, defying the<br />
assumption that the poor are always high demanders of<br />
redistribution.<br />
Paper Educational Attainment in Developing Countries: The Legacy<br />
of Landlords<br />
Tim C. Wegenast, University Pompeu, Fabra<br />
Overview: Educational distribution is related to land ownership<br />
structures and subsequent political power constellations in LDC’s.<br />
States showing cohesive and resistant landowners tend to neglect<br />
secondary education while overemphasizing higher schooling.<br />
Disc. Christian Ponce de Leon, University of Chicago<br />
Hiram J. Irizarry, Ohio State University<br />
4-12 CULTURE AND DEMOCRACY: NEW<br />
ARGUMENTS AND FINDINGS FROM SURVEY<br />
RESEARCH<br />
Room PDR 4, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair David Samuels, University of Minnesota<br />
Paper Building Social Capital: Civil Society and Context in Central<br />
America<br />
Patricia Bayer Richard, Ohio University<br />
John A. Booth, University of North Texas<br />
Overview: Using two waves of surveys from six Central American<br />
nations, we investigate changes in the relative contributions of<br />
civil society and socio-political context to the formation of social<br />
capital that promotes and sustains democracy.<br />
Paper The Meaning of Democracy in Emerging Democracies<br />
Doh C. Shin, University of Missouri<br />
Overview: This paper explores how the mass publics of Asian<br />
countries understand democracy. By analyzing the East Asia<br />
Barometers and surveys recently conducted by the Asia<br />
Foundation, the paper will compare its meaning across a broad set<br />
of Asian nations.<br />
Paper A More Acceptable Game? Changing Mass Attitudes and<br />
Deepening Democracy<br />
Matthew D. Fails, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />
Heather N. Pierce, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />
Overview: We empirically evaluate a central tenet of the political<br />
culture approach to democratic consolidation by testing how<br />
changes in mass commitment to democracy lead to a deepening of<br />
liberal democratic governance.<br />
Paper Does Support for Democracy Matter?<br />
Christopher Claassen, Washington University, St Louis<br />
Robert Mattes, University of Cape Town<br />
Overview: We use cross-national survey data to argue that public<br />
support for democracy, measured in relation to the current 'supply'<br />
of democracy, is a more powerful explanation of democratization<br />
than Inglehart and Welzel's 'self-expression values'.<br />
Disc. Chappell Lawson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
5-7 COALITION BARGAINING AND POLITICAL<br />
POWER<br />
Room Salon 4, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Katri Sieberg, Binghamton University<br />
Paper Institutions and the Survival of Authoritarian Regimes<br />
Susanne D. Michalik, University of Konstanz<br />
Overview: This paper deals with the effect of ?democratic?<br />
political institutions in authoritarian regimes.<br />
Page | 223