23.01.2013 Views

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Saturday, April 14 – 12:45 pm – 2:20 pm<br />

1-103 ROUNDTABLE: STUDYING GENDER AND<br />

POLITICS OVER TIME: RESEARCH QUESTIONS<br />

AND STRATEGIES (Co-sponsored with Gender and<br />

Politics, see 28-103)<br />

Room Red Lacquer, 4 th Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />

Chair Kira Sanbonmatsu, Rutgers University<br />

Panelist Maryann Barakso, American University<br />

Karen Beckwith, Case Western Reserve University<br />

Corrine McConnaughy, University of Texas, Austin<br />

Pamela Paxton, Ohio State University<br />

Gretchen Ritter, University of Texas, Austin<br />

Aili M. Tripp, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />

Overview: Panelists on this roundtable will discuss research<br />

questions and methods for analyzing gender and politics over<br />

time.<br />

2-12 PARTY POLARIZATION, PARTY CONVERGENCE<br />

IN DEVELOPED DEMOCRACIES<br />

Room Salon 1, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />

Chair Eric C. Browne, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee<br />

Paper Polarization and <strong>Political</strong> Stability in Multiparty Systems<br />

(1945-1998)<br />

Zeev Maoz, University of California, Davis<br />

Zeynep Somer, University of Califonia, Davis<br />

Overview: We argue that low levels of political polarization make<br />

cabinet shifts more likely. We use a new measure of polarization<br />

derived from social networks analysis. This measure combines<br />

ideological distances between parties with the number of seats.<br />

Paper What's Left of the Left? Party Politics and Economic<br />

Globalization<br />

Stephen C. Nelson, Cornell University<br />

Overview: This paper investigates claims about the shifting<br />

ideological position of mainstream left parties in OECD countries.<br />

Using cross-section time series data from party manifestos, I argue<br />

that globalization does not explain Left party shifts.<br />

Paper Party Polarization in OECD Countries. Developments and<br />

Determinants<br />

Philipp Rehm, Duke University<br />

Overview: How did (societal and party) polarization develop in<br />

OECD countries in the last few decades? What explains the<br />

observed differences? The paper presents new measures and new<br />

data and explores determinants of polarization in comparative<br />

perspective.<br />

Paper The Construction of Economic Facts: Labour Neoliberalism in<br />

the Antipodes<br />

Jonathan Swarts, Purdue University, North Central<br />

Overview: This paper examines neoliberalism under Australian<br />

and New Zealand Labour as a discursive construction of political<br />

elites. It argues that the discourse of “objective” economic “facts”<br />

was fundamentally a strategic, contestable political strategy.<br />

Disc. Eric C. Browne, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee<br />

3-11 INEQUALITY AND EDUCATION<br />

Room Salon 2, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />

Chair Christian Ponce de Leon, University of Chicago<br />

Paper <strong>Political</strong> Determinants of Public Expenditure Between Levels<br />

of Education<br />

Marco A. Fernandez, Duke University<br />

Overview: The study of the impact of political regimes over<br />

education spending has put little attention to the tradeoffs<br />

politicians face when they allocate resources among different<br />

education levels. In this paper I test several political economy<br />

hypothesis regard<br />

Paper How Governments Decide to Make Human Capital<br />

Stephen Kosack, Yale University<br />

Overview: In this paper, I construct a theory that governments<br />

provide education systems entirely based on specific political<br />

calculations, not economic or other welfare considerations, and<br />

test it in 3 carefully-selected countries: Taiwan, Ghana, and Brazil.<br />

Paper Democracy and Education Spending<br />

Amy H. Liu, Emory University<br />

Overview: I review the democracies-spend-more-on-education<br />

claim by directly testing two mechanisms. The results suggest it is<br />

not democracy per se that matters but rather the participation costs<br />

for society and the entry barriers for challengers.<br />

Paper Democracy and Inequality: Elections and Redistribution in<br />

Brazil<br />

Fabiana V. P. Machado, University of Rochester<br />

Overview: This study argues that both poverty and inequality may<br />

hinder the demand for forms of redistribution that are viewed as<br />

effective in ameliorating these very conditions, defying the<br />

assumption that the poor are always high demanders of<br />

redistribution.<br />

Paper Educational Attainment in Developing Countries: The Legacy<br />

of Landlords<br />

Tim C. Wegenast, University Pompeu, Fabra<br />

Overview: Educational distribution is related to land ownership<br />

structures and subsequent political power constellations in LDC’s.<br />

States showing cohesive and resistant landowners tend to neglect<br />

secondary education while overemphasizing higher schooling.<br />

Disc. Christian Ponce de Leon, University of Chicago<br />

Hiram J. Irizarry, Ohio State University<br />

4-12 CULTURE AND DEMOCRACY: NEW<br />

ARGUMENTS AND FINDINGS FROM SURVEY<br />

RESEARCH<br />

Room PDR 4, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />

Chair David Samuels, University of Minnesota<br />

Paper Building Social Capital: Civil Society and Context in Central<br />

America<br />

Patricia Bayer Richard, Ohio University<br />

John A. Booth, University of North Texas<br />

Overview: Using two waves of surveys from six Central American<br />

nations, we investigate changes in the relative contributions of<br />

civil society and socio-political context to the formation of social<br />

capital that promotes and sustains democracy.<br />

Paper The Meaning of Democracy in Emerging Democracies<br />

Doh C. Shin, University of Missouri<br />

Overview: This paper explores how the mass publics of Asian<br />

countries understand democracy. By analyzing the East Asia<br />

Barometers and surveys recently conducted by the Asia<br />

Foundation, the paper will compare its meaning across a broad set<br />

of Asian nations.<br />

Paper A More Acceptable Game? Changing Mass Attitudes and<br />

Deepening Democracy<br />

Matthew D. Fails, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />

Heather N. Pierce, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />

Overview: We empirically evaluate a central tenet of the political<br />

culture approach to democratic consolidation by testing how<br />

changes in mass commitment to democracy lead to a deepening of<br />

liberal democratic governance.<br />

Paper Does Support for Democracy Matter?<br />

Christopher Claassen, Washington University, St Louis<br />

Robert Mattes, University of Cape Town<br />

Overview: We use cross-national survey data to argue that public<br />

support for democracy, measured in relation to the current 'supply'<br />

of democracy, is a more powerful explanation of democratization<br />

than Inglehart and Welzel's 'self-expression values'.<br />

Disc. Chappell Lawson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />

5-7 COALITION BARGAINING AND POLITICAL<br />

POWER<br />

Room Salon 4, 3 rd Floor, Sat at 12:45 pm<br />

Chair Katri Sieberg, Binghamton University<br />

Paper Institutions and the Survival of Authoritarian Regimes<br />

Susanne D. Michalik, University of Konstanz<br />

Overview: This paper deals with the effect of ?democratic?<br />

political institutions in authoritarian regimes.<br />

Page | 223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!