2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
country’s history of past successful and failed coups, drawn from<br />
an original dataset of 500 post-WWII coup attempts worldwide.<br />
Paper State Capacity, Taxation and Civil Wars<br />
Zeynep Taydas, Clemson University<br />
Dursun Peksen, University of Missouri<br />
Overview: State capacity is an important determinant of civil<br />
wars. Our paper shows that weaker states are more likely to<br />
experience civil wars.<br />
Disc. Jessica A. Stanton, Columbia University<br />
18-5 PUBLIC OPINION, CONGRESS, AND FOREIGN<br />
POLICY<br />
Room Salon 7, 3 rd Floor, Fri at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair James M. McCormick, Iowa State University<br />
Paper Ideology, Economy, Policy Opposition, and the Strategic<br />
Targeting of the U.S.<br />
Dennis M. Foster, Virginia Military Institute<br />
Overview: Explores the intervening role of partisan ideology on<br />
the relationships amongst diversionary incentives, congressional<br />
foreign policy opposition, and the strategic targeting/avoidance of<br />
the United States.<br />
Paper Playing with AIPAC: The Growing Arab Lobby's Strength<br />
Khalil M. Marrar, DePaul University<br />
Overview: Scholarship on domestic actors shaping American<br />
policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has always<br />
concentrated on pro-Israel lobbying groups while ignoring the<br />
growing effectiveness of the pro-Arab lobby. This paper attempts<br />
to remedy that.<br />
Disc. Elizabeth A. Bloodgood, Concordia University<br />
19-6 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION AND<br />
VIOLENCE<br />
Room Clark 10, 7 th Floor, Fri at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Alexander Thompson, Ohio State University<br />
Paper Does Hierarchy Matter? International Hierarchy and the<br />
Final Solution<br />
Ethan J. Hollander, University of California, San Diego<br />
Overview: This paper demonstrates that the efficient<br />
implementation of the Final Solution depended upon the level of<br />
hierarchy between Germany and each occupied country. It thus<br />
elucidates the factors that contribute to the success of policy<br />
implementation.<br />
Paper Accounting for Endogeneity in the Success of UN<br />
Peacekeeping Missions<br />
Andrew G. Long, University of Mississippi<br />
Greg Day, University of Mississippi<br />
Harvey D. Palmer, University of Mississippi<br />
Overview: We evaluate a bivariate probit model that accounts for<br />
endogeneity in the decision-making calculus determining where<br />
the UN intervenes and the impact of UN intervention, as well as<br />
other factors, on the likelihood of conflict reoccurrence.<br />
Paper Time Out: Examining the Duration of Interventions<br />
Susan Hannah Allen, Texas Tech University<br />
Shelli Keck, Texas Tech University<br />
Overview: What determines when an international intervention<br />
effort will end? Higher casualties increase the likelihood of<br />
intervention (Gilligan and Stedman 2003), but do more intense<br />
conflicts lead to longer or shorter intervention efforts?<br />
Disc. Alexander Thompson, Ohio State University<br />
21-3 VOTER RESPONSE TO CANDIDATE STRATEGY<br />
AND INFORMATION (Co-sponsored with Voting<br />
Behavior, see 22-18)<br />
Room Salon 12, 3 rd Floor, Fri at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Dan Cassino, Fairleigh Dickinson University<br />
Paper Do Citizens Follow the Crowd at Election Time? How Polls<br />
Affect Decisions<br />
Cheryl Boudreau, University of California, San Diego<br />
Mathew D. McCubbins, University of California, San Diego<br />
Overview: We use experiments to assess whether and when polls<br />
help citizens to improve their decisions. Specifically, we examine<br />
whether polls help even unsophisticated citizens and whether<br />
opportunity costs prevent citizens from seeking polling<br />
information.<br />
Paper What to Attack? Candidate Strategy and Voter Response<br />
David A. M. Peterson, Texas A&M University<br />
Overview: This paper focuses on the content of attacks by<br />
candidates. I ask two questions: 1) do candidate chose to attack<br />
their opponents' perceived strengths or weaknesses? and 2) which<br />
attack is more effective at persuading voters?<br />
Paper Like leader, Like Party: Leadership Assessments and Party<br />
Images in NL<br />
Tereza Capelos, Leiden University<br />
Sabine van der Eijk, Leiden University<br />
Ron van den Akker, Leiden University<br />
Overview: This paper examines how trait perceptions of political<br />
leaders determine the image of political parties. This question is<br />
particularly timely in the context of more personalized and<br />
candidate centered politics in parliamentary European<br />
democracies.<br />
Paper Candidate Ambiguity and <strong>Political</strong> Competition<br />
Robert P. Van Houweling, University of California, Berkeley<br />
Michael Tomz, Stanford University<br />
Paul Sniderman, Stanford University<br />
Overview: We use survey experiments to assess the effects of<br />
candidate ambiguity on voter perceptions and choice. Our<br />
findings have important implications for politics, because they<br />
demonstrate a partisan bias citizens responses to ambiguous<br />
platforms.<br />
Disc. Cindy D. Kam, University of California, Davis<br />
21-101 ROUNDTABLE: 25 YEARS OF POLITICAL<br />
TOLERANCE<br />
Room Red Lacquer, 4 th Floor, Fri at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Stanley Feldman, Stony Brook University<br />
Panelist George Marcus, Williams College<br />
Dennis Chong, Northwestern University<br />
Darren Davis, Michigan State University<br />
James Gibson, Washington University, St. Louis<br />
Overview: Reflections on the past, present, and future of tolerance<br />
research.<br />
22-6 THE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF<br />
GEOGRAPHY<br />
Room Salon 8, 3 rd Floor, Fri at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Scott McClurg, Southern Illinois University<br />
Paper The <strong>Political</strong> Geography of the 2006 Election<br />
David A. Hopkins, University of California, Berkeley<br />
Overview: Voting patterns have become more geographically<br />
distinct in recent U.S. elections. This paper investigates the extent<br />
to which this trend continued in 2006.<br />
Paper The Effects of Racial Segregation on <strong>Political</strong> Participation<br />
Ryan D. Enos, University of California, Los Angeles<br />
Overview: This paper shows that racial homogeneity at the<br />
neighborhood level increases individual political participation<br />
among African Americans; while segregating these neighborhoods<br />
within cities also increases participation.<br />
Paper There Goes the Neighborhood: The Impact of Population<br />
Growth on Turnout<br />
Joseph D. Giammo, University of Arkansas, Little Rock<br />
Overview: In this paper I examine the impact of population<br />
growth on the rate of turnout in a community, focusing on a<br />
random sample of counties across the country over the past eight<br />
presidential elections.<br />
Paper Voters Like Me: Domestic Migration and Proximity to Shared<br />
Ideology<br />
Ian R. McDonald, Duke University<br />
Overview: Does migration within the United States lead to<br />
geographic sorting of political preferences? This paper considers<br />
the claim that individuals tend to migrate towards other residents<br />
who share their political ideology.<br />
Page | 161