23.01.2013 Views

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thursday, April 12 – 4:25 pm – 6:00 pm<br />

1-114 ROUNDTABLE: THE POLITICS OF THE JOB<br />

MARKET<br />

Room Red Lacquer, 4 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Julie Novkov, SUNY, Albany<br />

Panelist Larry Bartels, Princeton University<br />

Paul A. Beck, Ohio State University<br />

Susan Burgess, Ohio University<br />

John Huber, Columbia University<br />

Paula McClain, Duke University<br />

Kay L. Scholzman, Boston College<br />

Overview: Panelists will provide professional advice about the job<br />

market.<br />

1-117 AUTHOR MEETS CRITICS: POLITICS IN THE<br />

LABORATORY<br />

Room Monroe, 6 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Panelist Gary M. Segura, University of Washington, Seattle<br />

Ira H. Carmen, University of Illinois<br />

J. David Singer, University of Michigan<br />

John Hibbing, University of Nebraska<br />

Dianne Pinderhughes, University of Notre Dame<br />

Overview: Author Meets Critics: "Politics in the Laboratory: The<br />

Constitution of Human Genomics" by Ira Carmen.<br />

2-6 SUBCONSTITUENCY REPRESENTATION:<br />

EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES<br />

Room Salon 1, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Martin Gilens, Princeton University<br />

Paper Dynamic Representation in European Democracies: Who do<br />

<strong>Political</strong> Parties Represent?<br />

James Adams, University of California, Davis<br />

Lawrence Ezrow, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam<br />

Overview: TBA<br />

Paper The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation<br />

Benjamin Bishin, University of California, Riverside<br />

Overview: TBA<br />

Paper Dynamic Correspondence versus Dynamic Representation: Do<br />

Parties Respond to their Supporters or to the Median Voter?<br />

Erica Edwards, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill<br />

Marco Steenbergen, University of North Carolina<br />

Catherine E. De Vries, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam<br />

Overview: TBA<br />

Paper Party Polarization and Representation<br />

John Griffin, University of Notre Dame<br />

Overview: TBA<br />

Paper Electoral Politics and Poverty Relief: How Changing Electoral<br />

Incentives Can Help the Poor<br />

Karen Long Jusko, University of Michigan<br />

Overview: TBA<br />

Disc. Martin Gilens, Princeton University<br />

3-21 REGIME STABILITY<br />

Room Salon 2, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Gilles Serra, Harvard University<br />

Paper Democracy and Quality of Government in Latin America: An<br />

Empirical Analysis<br />

Guillermo M. Cejudo, Centro de Investigación y Docencia<br />

Económicas<br />

Overview: I argue that the quality of government in Latin America<br />

is improved by the introduction of political constraints on the<br />

Executive and a free press, which have a greater impact than other<br />

components of democracy such as competition and participation.<br />

Paper Thailand Institutions and the 2006 Coup: Decentralization<br />

and Empowerment<br />

Jeanne-Marie Col, City University of New York<br />

Overview: The 2006 politico-military coup in Thailand, unlike<br />

past coups, confronted newly empowered citizens as a result of<br />

recent governance programs, such as decentralization, people<br />

participation, and performance management.<br />

Paper Democratic Stability in Divided Societies: An Empirical<br />

Examination<br />

Cengiz Erisen, SUNY, Stony Brook<br />

Overview: This study elaborates on the question of why divided<br />

societies face particular obstacles in maintaining democracy<br />

through an empirical examination of political institutional settings<br />

in 142 countries.<br />

Paper One Man, One Vote, One Party: The Democratic Dominance<br />

of the BDP and ANC<br />

John M. French, University of Illinois, Chicago<br />

Overview: Using institutional analysis of government performance<br />

as well as survey data, this paper argues that the lack of political<br />

turnover in Botswana and South Africa does not indicate that their<br />

democracies are either unstable or unconsolidated.<br />

Paper Transitional Conflicts in South Africa and South Korea<br />

G. Jiyun Kim, University of Michigan<br />

Overview: I analyze the nature and the timing of political<br />

stabilization in five episodes of transitional conflicts in South<br />

Africa and South Korea.<br />

Disc. Gilles Serra, Harvard University<br />

3-301 POSTER SESSION: COMPARATIVE POLITICS:<br />

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES<br />

Room Exhibit Hall, 4 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Presenter Who Needs DINGOS: Developmental INGOs and Economic<br />

and Human Development<br />

(Board 1)<br />

Amanda M. Murdie, Emory University<br />

Jakub Kakietek, Emory University<br />

Overview: We examine the impact of International Developmental<br />

NGOs on different economic and human development indicators.<br />

Presenter From "Mass Campaign" to "Fire-Alarm": Explaining the<br />

Emergence of Administrative Litigation in China<br />

(Board 2)<br />

Yi Zhao, Grand Valley State University<br />

Overview: The paper argues that the administrative litigation was<br />

initiated in China as part of the effort to introduce what Mathew<br />

McCubbins and Thomas Schwartz call “fire-alarm” mechanism to<br />

supervise bureaucracy.<br />

Presenter The Exaggeration of Muslim Clerical Leadership<br />

(Board 3)<br />

Julie E. Taylor, Princeton University<br />

Overview: I argue that clerical leadership has been exaggerated<br />

due to poor case selection, inaccurate motive imputation, and the<br />

tendency for clerics to trigger bandwagoning.<br />

Presenter Coercion, Capital and Insurgency<br />

(Board 4)<br />

Derek M. Glanz, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill<br />

Overview: Insurgencies and states are often compared, but few<br />

systematic studies of their likeness exist. This paper examines the<br />

benefits and limitations of the conceptualization of insurgencies as<br />

æstates' using small-N data.<br />

4-3 PERSPECTIVES ON MEXICO'S TRANSITION TO<br />

DEMOCRACY II<br />

Room PDR 4, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Jonathan T. Hiskey, Vanderbilt University<br />

Paper Elections, Social Public Spending and Institutions in Mexico<br />

2000-2006<br />

Gabriela Perez-Yarahuán, Universidad Iberoamericana<br />

Overview: This paper explores the evolution of social public<br />

spending in Mexico in a time of democratic transition and high<br />

electoral competition. The data base used is annual municipal<br />

level data for a variety of social programs.<br />

Paper Diffuse Violent Crime and Democracy: Mexico in<br />

Comparative Perspective<br />

John J. Bailey, Georgetown University<br />

Gustavo A. Flores, Georgetown University<br />

Overview: Democratic transitions in Latin America and elsewhere<br />

coincided with sharp increases in violent crime. Fragile<br />

democracies were poorly prepared to cope with criminal violence,<br />

which—in many cases—contributed to an erosion of popular<br />

support for regime.<br />

Page | 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!