2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
deliberation experiment. We argue that these respondents can lack<br />
the mental "schema" for absorbing new political information.<br />
Paper The Interplay between <strong>Political</strong> Discussion and Sense of<br />
Community<br />
Mary R. Anderson, University of Memphis<br />
Overview: This paper explores the interplay between sense of<br />
community and patterns of political discussion.<br />
Paper Is Deliberative Democracy Psychologically Plausible?<br />
Arthur Lupia, University of Michigan<br />
Yanna Krupnikov, University of Michigan<br />
Adam Seth Levine, University of Michigan<br />
Overview: In deliberation, participants take turns speaking. We<br />
examine communicative dynamics that are related to<br />
communicative sequences. We use these insights to build a new<br />
theory of deliberative effectiveness.<br />
Paper Strategic and Communicative Rationality in a Deliberative<br />
Field Experiment<br />
Peter J. Muhlberger, Texas Tech University<br />
Overview: Strategic participants may seek to manipulate<br />
democratic deliberation. This paper validates a measure of<br />
manipulation and finds that it occurs more in some online<br />
deliberations and is explained by political internalization and<br />
authority attitudes.<br />
Disc. Thomas E. Nelson, Ohio State University<br />
22-1 BALLOT ORDER EFFECTS<br />
Room Salon 8, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 8:00 am<br />
Chair Michael J. Hanmer, Georgetown University<br />
Paper Titling Effects on Passage of State Ballot Initiatives<br />
Chad Murphy, University of California, Riverside<br />
Jackie Filla, University of California, Riverside<br />
Overview: Does changing the titles of ballot initiatives change the<br />
level of support for the initiative?<br />
Paper The Causes and Consequence of Ballot Order-Effects<br />
Marc N. Meredith, Stanford University<br />
Yuval Salant, Stanford University<br />
Overview: We show that ballot order changes the outcomes of<br />
over five percent of California local elections. Focusing on multimember<br />
district elections allows us to isolate the mechanisms<br />
causing order-effects in a way unavailable in single-member<br />
districts.<br />
Paper Ballot Effects: Expanding External Validity Through Wider<br />
Experimentation<br />
Joseph Sempolinski, Yale University<br />
Overview: A replication of the ballot order experiment described<br />
in Koppell and Steen 2004. The method utilizes the rotation of<br />
ballot order in New York City for primaries. This is a replication<br />
in the same setting over a new, more varied and larger dataset.<br />
Disc. Michael J. Hanmer, Georgetown University<br />
23-1 THE IMPACT OF MONEY AND FINANCE<br />
REGULATIONS<br />
Room Salon 7, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 8:00 am<br />
Chair David Dulio, Oakland University<br />
Paper The FEC as Enforcer: Evaluating the ‘Toothless Anaconda’<br />
Michael M. Franz, Bowdoin College<br />
Overview: This paper evaluates the enforcement actions of the<br />
FEC by exploiting a unique database of 700 legal complaints<br />
moderated by the commission since 1995.<br />
Paper Spending Limits in Practice: The Case of Albuquerque<br />
Anthony G. Gierzynski, University of Vermont<br />
Donald Gross, University of Kentucky<br />
Overview: This paper reports on a time series analysis of the<br />
impact of mandatory campaign spending limits in Albuquerque,<br />
NM city elections on the costs of elections, voter turnout,<br />
competition, reelection rates of incumbents, and electoral success.<br />
Paper Public Money, Candidate Time, and Electoral Outcomes in<br />
State Legislative Elections<br />
Michael G. Miller, Cornell University<br />
Overview: Using survey data, I find that publicly-funded<br />
candidates spend less time raising money and more time actively<br />
seeking votes than traditionally funded candidates. Further, this<br />
extra time in the field translates to general election vote gains.<br />
Paper Money and Elections: The Iowa State Legislative Elections of<br />
2006<br />
Arthur Sanders, Drake University<br />
Overview: This study uses finance data and interviews with party<br />
and group leaders to explore the strategies, successes and failures<br />
in the 2006 Iowa State House and Senate elections with a focus on<br />
the impact of money on those races.<br />
Disc. David Dulio, Oakland University<br />
Kevin M. Wagner, Florida Atlantic University<br />
24-2 GENDER QUOTAS AND WOMEN'S<br />
REPRESENTATION<br />
Room Sandburg 1, 7 th Floor, Thur at 8:00 am<br />
Chair Miki Caul Kittilson, Arizona State University<br />
Paper Electoral Quotas: Frequency and Effectiveness<br />
Richard E. Matland, Loyola University, Chicago<br />
Overview: This paper proposes a model of gender quotas for<br />
elections to parliamentary positions, taking the legislative<br />
recruitment process as a starting point. It then analyzes the<br />
variables that influence which types of quotas are adopted.<br />
Paper Democratic Legitimacy or Electoral Gain? Why Countries<br />
Adopt Gender Quotas<br />
Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer, University of Mississippi<br />
Harvey Palmer, University of Mississippi<br />
Overview: We empirically test a theory of endogenous<br />
institutional change to determine whether states and parties adopt<br />
legislative gender quotas to achieve long-term goals of democratic<br />
legitimacy via more inclusive electoral participation or if they<br />
adopt quotas.<br />
Paper The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased<br />
Female Legislative Representation<br />
Aili Mari Tripp, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />
Alice Kang, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />
Overview: This crossnational study of 153 countries demonstrates<br />
that today the introduction of quotas offers the most explanatory<br />
power for women's representation in national legislatures together<br />
with party-list proportional representation electoral systems.<br />
Paper Theorizing the Implementation and Impact of Candidate<br />
Gender Quotas<br />
Mona Lena Krook, Washington University, St. Louis<br />
Overview: Gender quotas have now been adopted in more than<br />
one hundred countries around the world, but result in varying<br />
changes in the numbers of women elected to political office.<br />
Disc. Pamela Paxton, Ohio State University<br />
25-1 PARTISANSHIP AND PARTY CUES<br />
Room Salon 9, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 8:00 am<br />
Chair Paul R. Abramson, Michigan State University<br />
Paper Why Does Macropartisanship Vary Substantially from Cohort<br />
to Cohort?<br />
Matthew D. Atkinson, University of California, Los Angeles<br />
Overview: Macropartisanship varies substantially from cohort to<br />
cohort. The macropartisanship of each cohort is explained by the<br />
national policy mood during the cohort's early adolescence. The<br />
mechanism underlying this relationship is event-driven<br />
socialization.<br />
Paper Party Frames and Public Opinion<br />
Rune Slothuus, University of Aarhus<br />
Overview: The relative impact of party cues and issue frames on<br />
citizens' opinion formation and interactive effects of source,<br />
message, and receiver characteristics are investigated in a series of<br />
experiments embedded in a 2006 national representative survey.<br />
Paper Asymmetric Partisan Biases in Perceptions of <strong>Political</strong> Parties<br />
Jonathan Woon, Carnegie Mellon University<br />
Overview: I show that citizens’ perceptions of party positions on<br />
issues vary systematically as a function of partisanship, show that<br />
its effects are nonlinear and vary across issues, and investigate the<br />
role of affect, sophistication, and issue salience.<br />
Page | 71