2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Paper Gender Bending: Strategies in Candidate Direct Mail<br />
Monica C. Schneider, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities<br />
Overview: Under what conditions do male and female candidates<br />
use rhetoric that is consistent or inconsistent with gender<br />
stereotypes? I examine candidate use of gender-based strategies<br />
using a unique set of data: direct mail pieces from House and<br />
Senate candidates.<br />
Disc. Joseph Giammo, University of Arkansas, Little Rock<br />
24-5 ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND POLICY<br />
Room Suite 9-128, 9 th Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />
Chair Matthew Wall, Trinity College, Dublin<br />
Paper Much Ado About Nothing: Congruence, Choice, and Two<br />
Visions of Democracy<br />
Matthew R. Golder, Florida State University<br />
Jacek Stramski, Florida State University<br />
Overview: When are the policies of a government likely to be<br />
congruent with the preferences of its people? When are voters<br />
likely to have a meaningful choice at election time?<br />
Paper Expressive Motives, Third-Party Candidates, and Voter<br />
Welfare<br />
Indridi H. Indridason, University of Iceland<br />
Overview: We consider a model of electoral competition where a<br />
subset of voters cast expressive or sincere votes. We characterize<br />
the equilibria of the game showing that, given certain conditions,<br />
third party candidates leave their constituency worse off.<br />
Paper Heterogeneity and Representation Reconsidered<br />
Benjamin G. Bishin, University of California, Riverside<br />
Overview: Research holds legislators from diverse constituencies<br />
are less responsive to citizens and more responsive to party and<br />
other influences. Once subconstituencies are considered, the<br />
differences observed according to state diversity disappear.<br />
Paper Intraparty Institutions and Representation<br />
Georgia C. Kernell, Columbia University<br />
Overview: This paper examines how intraparty institutions shape<br />
representation of voters, partisans and activists.<br />
Disc. Matthew Wall, Trinity College, Dublin<br />
25-8 PUBLIC OPINION, FOREIGN POLICY, AND THE<br />
IRAQ WAR<br />
Room Salon 9, 3 rd Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />
Chair William J. Josiger, Georgetown University<br />
Paper Media Coverage of Casualties and American Perceptions of<br />
Casualties in Iraq<br />
Michael Cobb, North Carolina State University<br />
Overview: This study collects and analyzes news coverage of war<br />
casualties in Iraq since the invasion to the present, and compares<br />
media coverage to actual casualty rates and Americans' estimates<br />
of cumulative casualties.<br />
Paper Impact of Presidential Religious Rhetoric on Public Opinion<br />
of the Iraq War<br />
Shannon M. Scotece, SUNY, Albany<br />
Overview: This paper will examine whether religious rhetoric has<br />
been used effectively by President Bush to influence religious<br />
citizens' public opinion on the Iraq War.<br />
Paper Foreign Trade Policy and Public Opinion, 1978-2004<br />
Julia Rabinovich, Northwestern University<br />
Overview: This paper examines government officials’<br />
responsiveness to the public’s foreign policy preferences using<br />
data from the 1978-2004 quadrennial elite and public opinion<br />
surveys sponsored by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations<br />
(CCFR).<br />
Paper U.S. Foreign Policy and Multilateralism: A Comparison of<br />
American Leaders and Mass Opinion<br />
Gregory G. Holyk, University of Illinois, Chicago<br />
Overview: The general public has been quite supportive of<br />
multilateralism while policy leaders have not. This study analyses<br />
a core group of questions relating to multilateralism and overall<br />
values in 10 CCFR polls (1974 to 2006) to explain this disconnect.<br />
Paper The American Public’s Ambivalent Attitude in Foreign Policy<br />
Young Hwan Park, University of Alabama<br />
Overview: Under incomplete information and confined cognitive<br />
resources, individuals tend to use theory-driven information<br />
processing in forming political judgements across a range of<br />
policy domains.<br />
Disc. Richard Sobel, Harvard Medical School<br />
25-301 POSTER SESSION: PUBLIC OPINION<br />
Room Exhibit Hall, 4 th Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />
Presenter 2008 and Beyond: Unraveling the Dean Vote in the 2004<br />
Democratic Presidential Primaries<br />
(Board 1)<br />
Gabriella Paar-Jakli, Kent State University<br />
Caroline Tolbert, University of Iowa<br />
Overview: 2008 and Beyond: Unraveling the Dean Vote in the<br />
2004 Democratic Presidential Primaries<br />
Presenter Muslim American Politics in the Post-9/11 Era<br />
(Board 2)<br />
Geoffrey Peterson, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire<br />
David Jacobs, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire<br />
Overview: Using recent national survey data, this paper seeks to<br />
examine how Muslim-Americans think and act politically since<br />
the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001.<br />
Presenter An Attitudinal Explanation of the Increasing Use of Initiatives<br />
(Board 3)<br />
Hoi-ok Jeong, University of Iowa<br />
Overview: My paper explains what causes the increasing use of<br />
initiative process. I argue that the increase in direct democracy<br />
results largely from two basic attitudinal trends: the weakening of<br />
political efficacy and the declining trust in government.<br />
Presenter African American Affect Towards Chisholm in the 1972<br />
Presidential Election<br />
(Board 4)<br />
Christopher J. Clark, University of Iowa<br />
Overview: I aim to explore who better explains affect of African<br />
Americans toward Shirley Chisholm: Chisholm or scholars. This<br />
paper is important because it may provide proof that candidates<br />
better understand their bases of support than scholars think.<br />
Presenter The Responsive Electorate<br />
(Board 5)<br />
Peter K. Enns, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill<br />
Overview: I construct a theory of message reception that predicts<br />
the most and least informed segments of society update their<br />
attitudes in response to elite discourse. Analysis of attitudes<br />
toward welfare, defense, and policy mood support this hypothesis.<br />
Presenter Protecting the Flag: Public Opinion on a Constitutional<br />
Amendment to Prohibit Flag Burning from 1989 to 2006<br />
(Board 6)<br />
Peter C. Hanson, University of California, Berkeley<br />
Iris Hui, University of California, Berkeley<br />
Overview: The paper examines changes in the nature of public<br />
opinion on a constitutional amendment to prohibit flag burning.<br />
The roles played by variables such as patriotism, support for<br />
limited government, partisanship, education, love of the flag and<br />
ideology.<br />
26-6 POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND POLITICAL<br />
PARTICIPATION<br />
Room Clark 9, 7 th Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />
Chair Jan E. Leighley, University of Arizona<br />
Paper Information and Voter Turnout<br />
Tetsuya Matsubayashi, Texas A&M University<br />
Overview: This project will reconsider the role of information as a<br />
determinant of voter turnout. I will extend Downs' model by<br />
focusing on the concept of opinion ambivalence and test a<br />
hypothesis that citizens are less likely to go to the polls as<br />
additional information becomes available.<br />
Paper <strong>Political</strong> Expertise, Shared Biases, and Patterns of <strong>Political</strong><br />
Communication<br />
T. K. Ahn, Florida State University<br />
Robert Huckfeldt, University of California, Davis<br />
John B. Ryan, University of California, Davis<br />
Overview: One way to minimize political information costs is to<br />
obtain guidance from other individuals, and the primary purpose<br />
of this paper is to evaluate the relative importance of expertise and<br />
shared biases in the resulting patterns of communication.<br />
Page | 149