23.01.2013 Views

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Paper Gender Bending: Strategies in Candidate Direct Mail<br />

Monica C. Schneider, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities<br />

Overview: Under what conditions do male and female candidates<br />

use rhetoric that is consistent or inconsistent with gender<br />

stereotypes? I examine candidate use of gender-based strategies<br />

using a unique set of data: direct mail pieces from House and<br />

Senate candidates.<br />

Disc. Joseph Giammo, University of Arkansas, Little Rock<br />

24-5 ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND POLICY<br />

Room Suite 9-128, 9 th Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />

Chair Matthew Wall, Trinity College, Dublin<br />

Paper Much Ado About Nothing: Congruence, Choice, and Two<br />

Visions of Democracy<br />

Matthew R. Golder, Florida State University<br />

Jacek Stramski, Florida State University<br />

Overview: When are the policies of a government likely to be<br />

congruent with the preferences of its people? When are voters<br />

likely to have a meaningful choice at election time?<br />

Paper Expressive Motives, Third-Party Candidates, and Voter<br />

Welfare<br />

Indridi H. Indridason, University of Iceland<br />

Overview: We consider a model of electoral competition where a<br />

subset of voters cast expressive or sincere votes. We characterize<br />

the equilibria of the game showing that, given certain conditions,<br />

third party candidates leave their constituency worse off.<br />

Paper Heterogeneity and Representation Reconsidered<br />

Benjamin G. Bishin, University of California, Riverside<br />

Overview: Research holds legislators from diverse constituencies<br />

are less responsive to citizens and more responsive to party and<br />

other influences. Once subconstituencies are considered, the<br />

differences observed according to state diversity disappear.<br />

Paper Intraparty Institutions and Representation<br />

Georgia C. Kernell, Columbia University<br />

Overview: This paper examines how intraparty institutions shape<br />

representation of voters, partisans and activists.<br />

Disc. Matthew Wall, Trinity College, Dublin<br />

25-8 PUBLIC OPINION, FOREIGN POLICY, AND THE<br />

IRAQ WAR<br />

Room Salon 9, 3 rd Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />

Chair William J. Josiger, Georgetown University<br />

Paper Media Coverage of Casualties and American Perceptions of<br />

Casualties in Iraq<br />

Michael Cobb, North Carolina State University<br />

Overview: This study collects and analyzes news coverage of war<br />

casualties in Iraq since the invasion to the present, and compares<br />

media coverage to actual casualty rates and Americans' estimates<br />

of cumulative casualties.<br />

Paper Impact of Presidential Religious Rhetoric on Public Opinion<br />

of the Iraq War<br />

Shannon M. Scotece, SUNY, Albany<br />

Overview: This paper will examine whether religious rhetoric has<br />

been used effectively by President Bush to influence religious<br />

citizens' public opinion on the Iraq War.<br />

Paper Foreign Trade Policy and Public Opinion, 1978-2004<br />

Julia Rabinovich, Northwestern University<br />

Overview: This paper examines government officials’<br />

responsiveness to the public’s foreign policy preferences using<br />

data from the 1978-2004 quadrennial elite and public opinion<br />

surveys sponsored by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations<br />

(CCFR).<br />

Paper U.S. Foreign Policy and Multilateralism: A Comparison of<br />

American Leaders and Mass Opinion<br />

Gregory G. Holyk, University of Illinois, Chicago<br />

Overview: The general public has been quite supportive of<br />

multilateralism while policy leaders have not. This study analyses<br />

a core group of questions relating to multilateralism and overall<br />

values in 10 CCFR polls (1974 to 2006) to explain this disconnect.<br />

Paper The American Public’s Ambivalent Attitude in Foreign Policy<br />

Young Hwan Park, University of Alabama<br />

Overview: Under incomplete information and confined cognitive<br />

resources, individuals tend to use theory-driven information<br />

processing in forming political judgements across a range of<br />

policy domains.<br />

Disc. Richard Sobel, Harvard Medical School<br />

25-301 POSTER SESSION: PUBLIC OPINION<br />

Room Exhibit Hall, 4 th Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />

Presenter 2008 and Beyond: Unraveling the Dean Vote in the 2004<br />

Democratic Presidential Primaries<br />

(Board 1)<br />

Gabriella Paar-Jakli, Kent State University<br />

Caroline Tolbert, University of Iowa<br />

Overview: 2008 and Beyond: Unraveling the Dean Vote in the<br />

2004 Democratic Presidential Primaries<br />

Presenter Muslim American Politics in the Post-9/11 Era<br />

(Board 2)<br />

Geoffrey Peterson, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire<br />

David Jacobs, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire<br />

Overview: Using recent national survey data, this paper seeks to<br />

examine how Muslim-Americans think and act politically since<br />

the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001.<br />

Presenter An Attitudinal Explanation of the Increasing Use of Initiatives<br />

(Board 3)<br />

Hoi-ok Jeong, University of Iowa<br />

Overview: My paper explains what causes the increasing use of<br />

initiative process. I argue that the increase in direct democracy<br />

results largely from two basic attitudinal trends: the weakening of<br />

political efficacy and the declining trust in government.<br />

Presenter African American Affect Towards Chisholm in the 1972<br />

Presidential Election<br />

(Board 4)<br />

Christopher J. Clark, University of Iowa<br />

Overview: I aim to explore who better explains affect of African<br />

Americans toward Shirley Chisholm: Chisholm or scholars. This<br />

paper is important because it may provide proof that candidates<br />

better understand their bases of support than scholars think.<br />

Presenter The Responsive Electorate<br />

(Board 5)<br />

Peter K. Enns, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill<br />

Overview: I construct a theory of message reception that predicts<br />

the most and least informed segments of society update their<br />

attitudes in response to elite discourse. Analysis of attitudes<br />

toward welfare, defense, and policy mood support this hypothesis.<br />

Presenter Protecting the Flag: Public Opinion on a Constitutional<br />

Amendment to Prohibit Flag Burning from 1989 to 2006<br />

(Board 6)<br />

Peter C. Hanson, University of California, Berkeley<br />

Iris Hui, University of California, Berkeley<br />

Overview: The paper examines changes in the nature of public<br />

opinion on a constitutional amendment to prohibit flag burning.<br />

The roles played by variables such as patriotism, support for<br />

limited government, partisanship, education, love of the flag and<br />

ideology.<br />

26-6 POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND POLITICAL<br />

PARTICIPATION<br />

Room Clark 9, 7 th Floor, Fri at 9:50 am<br />

Chair Jan E. Leighley, University of Arizona<br />

Paper Information and Voter Turnout<br />

Tetsuya Matsubayashi, Texas A&M University<br />

Overview: This project will reconsider the role of information as a<br />

determinant of voter turnout. I will extend Downs' model by<br />

focusing on the concept of opinion ambivalence and test a<br />

hypothesis that citizens are less likely to go to the polls as<br />

additional information becomes available.<br />

Paper <strong>Political</strong> Expertise, Shared Biases, and Patterns of <strong>Political</strong><br />

Communication<br />

T. K. Ahn, Florida State University<br />

Robert Huckfeldt, University of California, Davis<br />

John B. Ryan, University of California, Davis<br />

Overview: One way to minimize political information costs is to<br />

obtain guidance from other individuals, and the primary purpose<br />

of this paper is to evaluate the relative importance of expertise and<br />

shared biases in the resulting patterns of communication.<br />

Page | 149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!