23.01.2013 Views

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Paper Presentation Style and <strong>Political</strong> Attitudes: The Daily Show vs.<br />

Network News<br />

Glory E. Koloen, Indiana University<br />

Overview: A comparative analysis of the impact of mediated<br />

political information presentation style on political attitudes;<br />

particularly internal and external efficacy and cynicism.<br />

Disc. Jocelyn D. Shadforth, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse<br />

28-9 WOMEN AND PUBLIC POLICY IN<br />

COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE<br />

Room Clark 7, 7 th Floor, Thur at 9:50 am<br />

Chair Mona Lena Krook, Washington University<br />

Paper Gender Gap, Welfare Spending and Democracy<br />

Eunju Kang, Claremont Graduate University<br />

Overview: This paper explains the size of welfare spending in<br />

democracies.<br />

Paper Democracy and Household Organization: Single Mothers,<br />

Economic Decisions and <strong>Political</strong> Values<br />

Tassili M. Pender, Claremont Graduate University<br />

Overview: The size and organization of the average family is<br />

changing dramatically in developed democracies. This research<br />

investigates the relationship between domestic market forces and<br />

recent changes in household organization.<br />

Paper States and Sex Equality: Why do Governments Promote<br />

Women's Rights?<br />

S. Laurel Weldon, Purdue University<br />

Mala N. Htun, New School University<br />

Overview: This paper offers a new theoretical explanation for<br />

when and why governments adopt women’s rights policies in<br />

thirteen specific policy issue-areas. The paper applies this<br />

approach in an analysis of an original dataset covering 70<br />

countries.<br />

Paper The European Union and Gender Advocacy in the Accession<br />

Process<br />

Celeste M. Montoya, Southern Illinois University<br />

Overview: This paper explores the Europeanization of gender<br />

equality policy through the accession process by focusing on<br />

membership requirements as well as local and transnational<br />

advocacy efforts.<br />

Paper Gender Dimension of EU-Turkey Relations<br />

Zeynep Sahin, University of Southern California<br />

Overview: Turkey`s aspiration for EU has forced Turkish state to<br />

introduce gender equality related legislative and institutional<br />

changes with the contributions of the women`s organizations.<br />

Disc. Adriana M. Crocker, University of Illinois, Springfield<br />

Mona Lena Krook, Washington University<br />

28-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: GENDER AND<br />

PUBLIC POLICY IN KOREA AND TAIWAN<br />

Room State, 4 th Floor, Table 5, Thur at 9:50 am<br />

Presenter Empowering Women: The Use of Quotas<br />

Jeeseon Jeon, Seoul National University<br />

Overview: This paper examines the impact of gender quotas in<br />

non-western context, focusing on South Korea's local elections. I<br />

will show that gender quotas enhance women's political<br />

participation, contrary to doubts about its impact in developing<br />

countries.<br />

28-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: COMPARATIVE<br />

ANALYSIS OF GENDER AND HUMAN RIGHTS<br />

Room State, 4 th Floor, Table 6, Thur at 9:50 am<br />

Presenter Comparative Analysis of Gender and Human Rights<br />

Myra Y. Irizarry, University of Texas, Dallas<br />

Overview: Human rights indicators are not universal and in some<br />

cases may not include gender or women’s rights. This paper will<br />

discuss the most common human rights indicators applied today,<br />

databases and data collection, and the absence of gender and<br />

women’s rights.<br />

30-1 TOPICS IN ANCIENT POLITICAL THOUGHT<br />

Room Dearborn 1, 7 th Floor, Thur at 9:50 am<br />

Chair Stephen Lange, Morehead State University<br />

Paper Eros and Freedom; Thucydides on the Fatal Contradiction of<br />

Politics<br />

Borden Flanagan, American University<br />

Overview: For Thucydides, it is through political life that we seek<br />

to protect our material interests, yet it is also through political life<br />

that we seek to transcend and achieve freedom from those<br />

interests.<br />

Pper Friendship, Temporality and Identity: Corinth and Corcyra in<br />

Thucydides I<br />

Rachel M. Templer, Georgetown University<br />

Overview: The debate between Corinth and Corcyra in<br />

Thucydides discussed as a debate between ascribed and achieved<br />

friendships as models of political identity. This points to problems<br />

of solidarity and temporal depth in liberal models of citizenship.<br />

Paper Ages and Straw Dogs: A Study of <strong>Political</strong> Violence in the<br />

Laozi<br />

Rick Parrish, West Texas A&M University<br />

Overview: A reinterpretation of the Laozi's Daoist sage ruler<br />

through Isaiah Berlin's typology of liberty, Nietzsche's master and<br />

slave moralities, and Derrida's economy of violence.<br />

Paper To The Memory Of Socrates: Moral Philosophy In Plato’s<br />

Laws<br />

Kyong Min Son, Cornell University<br />

Overview: This paper argues that Plato’s Laws, often regarded as<br />

his departure from philosophy towards institutional design and<br />

theology, is actually a refined defense of Socratic moral<br />

philosophy.<br />

Paper Thucydidean Answers to Nietzschean Questions: Das Religiose<br />

Wesen<br />

Benjamin P. Newton, University of Maryland, College Park<br />

Overview: Questions of nature’s role in politics--what constitutes<br />

a people, justice, necessity--thread together into a singular<br />

significant problem: what is religious? Within the framework of<br />

religiosity we can better understand nature’s place in politics.<br />

Disc. James T. Fetter, University of Notre Dame<br />

James M. Colman, Ashland University<br />

32-13 DELIBERATION, COMMUNICATION, AND<br />

REPRESENTATION<br />

Room LaSalle 1, 7 th Floor, Thur at 9:50 am<br />

Chair Stephen P. Chilton, University of Minnesota, Duluth<br />

Paper Communicative Rationality Revisited: Creative Imagination<br />

and the Politics of Intercultural Understanding<br />

Mihaela Czobor-Lupp, Georgetown University<br />

Overview: In the Liberating Power of Symbols, Habermas<br />

correctly points out that political conflicts are nowadays<br />

“increasingly defined from a cultural standpoint” and thus<br />

“intercultural understanding” becomes a task to be achieved.<br />

Paper What Makes Representation Democratic?<br />

Joseph P. Lampert, Yale University<br />

Overview: This paper develops a normative framework for<br />

democratic representation that improves upon prevalent<br />

contemporary perspectives, and which recasts the practices and<br />

institutions of democratic representation beyond the conventional<br />

legislative arena.<br />

Paper Beyond Facts and Norms: How Greater Transparency<br />

Improves Deliberative Democracy<br />

Arthur Lupia, University of Michigan<br />

Overview: I dissect the logic of Habermas’ “Between Facts and<br />

Norms” to clarify when deliberation can generate beneficial<br />

outcomes. My findings critique and extend his classic work by<br />

incorporating key attributes of participants’ perceptions and<br />

expectations.<br />

Disc. Danny Postel, Open Democracy Magazine<br />

Page | 85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!