23.01.2013 Views

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Paper Accountability at Risk: The Ability to Sanction Bureaucratic<br />

Agencies<br />

Alejandra Rios-Cazares, University of California, San Diego<br />

Overview: <strong>Political</strong> competition shapes legislators’ incentives to<br />

control bureaucratic agencies and affects the organization and<br />

resources of auditing institutions. Problems legislators face to<br />

enforce sanctions are explained.<br />

Paper The Long Road to Democracy: The <strong>Political</strong> Logic of<br />

Bureaucratic Reform in Mexico<br />

Jeeyang R. Baum, University of California, San Diego<br />

Alejandra Rios-Cazares, University of California, San Diego<br />

Overview: Why do dominant presidents cede power by opening<br />

up their bureaucracies? Using Mexico as a case study, we argue<br />

that they do so to enhance their control over recalcitrant<br />

bureaucrats.<br />

Paper The Party’s Over: Citizen Disenchantment in Mexico’s<br />

Emerging Democracy<br />

David Crow, University of Texas, Austin<br />

Overview: Some five years after the watershed 2000 Mexican<br />

elections, the "democratic fiesta" has fizzled out. Based on an<br />

original, NSF-funded survey from June, 2006, this paper explores<br />

the causes and consequences of Mexican disenchantment with<br />

democracy.<br />

Disc. Jonathan T. Hiskey, Vanderbilt University<br />

7-7 COMMITTEES AND COUNCILS: POLICYMAKING<br />

IN THE EU<br />

Room Sandburg 7, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Andreas K. Warntjen, London School of Economics<br />

Paper The EU Comitology System: Intergovernmental Bargaining or<br />

Deliberation?<br />

Jens Blom-Hansen, University of Aarhus<br />

Overview: In the 2-300 comitology committees the EU member<br />

states monitor the EU Commission. Are the committees<br />

characterized by intergovernmental bargaining or supranational<br />

deliberation? Data from a survey of all comitology committees<br />

provides an answer.<br />

Paper Committee Governance in EU Information Society Policy<br />

Alison J. Harcourt, University of Exeter<br />

Overview: The academic debate on EU committee governance is<br />

investigated with specific case study: the EU’s information society<br />

policy. The paper investigates the legitimacy and effectiveness of<br />

committee governance as a "soft" form of regulation.<br />

Paper The Impact of Potential Ratification Failure on<br />

Intergovernmental Negotiation Processes<br />

Hartmut Lenz, Oxford University<br />

Overview: The article analyzes the impact of possible ratification<br />

failure on the intergovernmental negotiation process. I develop a<br />

formal model based on a “Nash variable threat model”, which<br />

allows to account for the consequences of a ratification failure.<br />

Paper The Practice of Consensus in the EU Council of Ministers<br />

Stephanie J. Novak, Harvard University<br />

Overview: In the Council of the EU, most of the decisions which<br />

should be made by qualified majority voting are actually made by<br />

consensus. I will attempt to explain this phenomenon and to show<br />

how consensus differs from unanimity decision.<br />

Paper Divesting Power - EC Comitology and GMO Approvals<br />

Marko Papic, University of Texas, Austin<br />

Overview: This paper seeks to explain why Member States of the<br />

EU abdicate their "control" over the Commission when making<br />

regulatory decisions regarding the approval of Genetically<br />

Modified Organisms.<br />

Disc. Tobias Schulz, University of Zurich<br />

Daniel Finke, German University of Administrative <strong>Science</strong><br />

8-5 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN LATIN AMERICA<br />

Room Sandburg 6, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair David H. Richards, Texas Lutheran University<br />

Paper The Cutting Edge of Civility: Civil Society and Rule of Law in<br />

Rural Peru<br />

Luis F. Mantilla, Georgetown University<br />

Overview: This paper uses data regarding social conflicts in rural<br />

Peru to analyze the role played by local, voluntary associations in<br />

Page | 120<br />

checking governmental authority in an environment characterized<br />

by weak rule of law.<br />

Paper Decentralization, Citizenship and Democracy: The Ley de<br />

Participacion Popular in Bolivia<br />

Françoise Montambeault, McGill University<br />

Overview: The paper develops a theoretical framework for<br />

analyzing the social construction of citizenship at the local level in<br />

Latin America. It argues that decentralization at the city level<br />

provides new formal spaces for the development of civil society.<br />

Paper Countering Hegemony: The Salvadoran Popular Movements’<br />

Resistance Strategies<br />

Hector Perla, Ohio University<br />

Overview: Countering Hegemony: U.S. Foreign Policy & the<br />

Salvadoran Popular Movements’ Contentious Resistance<br />

Strategies.<br />

Paper Cuba in the Post-Soviet Era: Policy Decentralization and<br />

Social Networks<br />

Melissa Scheier, Georgetown College<br />

Overview: This paper explores agricultural policy decentralization<br />

in Cuba as a possible avenue to economic liberalization. Special<br />

focus is placed on the effect of policy decentralization on the<br />

formation of economic (social) networks.<br />

Disc. Eduardo Frajman, Saint Xavier University<br />

9-3 EXPLORATIONS INTO THE ASIAN<br />

DEVELOPMENTAL STATE<br />

Room Sandburg 5, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Lichao He, University of Georgia<br />

Paper Legacy of Developmental States: Institution, Interests, and<br />

Ideas<br />

Haeran Lim, Seoul National University<br />

Overview: This study is designed to explore the transformative<br />

process of developmental states, by comparing various<br />

transformation processes and explaining causes of path-dependent<br />

characteristics of industrial policy in Korea and Taiwan, even in<br />

IT period.<br />

Paper Chinese Techno-Nationalism and the Three-Note Chord<br />

Evan C. McKay, DePaul University<br />

Overview: This paper examines Chinese techno-nationalism<br />

within three components of the national innovation system:<br />

research and development, technology diffusion, and standards<br />

setting.<br />

Paper Determinants of Policy Perception: The Case of Regulatory<br />

Reform of South Korea<br />

Jin-Wook Choi, Korea University<br />

Jun Koo, Korea University<br />

Tae-eun Kim, Korea University<br />

Overview: Applying the rational choice theory to the regulatory<br />

policymaking and implementation processes, this paper examines<br />

what determines the level of policy perception centering on the<br />

regulatory reform process in Korea since the 1990s.<br />

Disc. Alexander C. Tan, University of Canterbury<br />

10-2 TRUST AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN AFRICA<br />

Room Sandburg 4, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />

Chair Carolyn Logan, Michigan State University, East Lansing<br />

Paper A Vicious Circle of Corruption and Trust in State in sub-<br />

Saharan Africa: A Micro-level Analysis<br />

Wonbin Cho, Michigan State University<br />

Matthew F. Kirwin, Michigan State University<br />

Overview: Using Afrobarometer survey data, this study<br />

investigates how corruption and trust in state are related to each<br />

other. It argues that corruption and mistrust feed each other,<br />

producing vicious circles.<br />

Paper The Trust Gap: Attitudes Toward Ruling and Opposition<br />

Parties in Africa<br />

Carolyn Logan, Michigan State University<br />

Robert Mattes, University of Cape Town<br />

Overview: Using public opinion data collected by the<br />

Afrobarometer in 18 African countries, this papers seeks to<br />

explain variations in the aggregate, country-level “gaps” between<br />

positive attitudes toward ruling and opposition parties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!