2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Paper Constitutional Theory of Legislative Organization:<br />
Directionality of Institutional Changes in the House<br />
Gisela Sin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign<br />
Overview: I show that changes in the President and Senate’s<br />
preferences alter the bargaining power of House members and that<br />
their new relative position with respect to those of House members<br />
determines the directionality of the institutional changes that<br />
occur.<br />
Disc. Glen S. Krutz, University of Oklahoma<br />
C. Lawrence Evans, College of William and Mary<br />
39-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: A PROPERTY<br />
RIGHTS APPROACH TO LEGISLATIVE<br />
ORGANIZATION<br />
Room State, 4 th Floor, Table 3, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Presenter A Property Rights Approach to Legislative Organization<br />
Blair Williams, United States Military Academy<br />
Overview: This paper presents a unified framework, combining<br />
elements of transaction-cost economics and contract theory, to<br />
explain the organizational structure of the U.S. House of<br />
Representatives.<br />
41-4 THE JUDICIAL POWER: INSULATION,<br />
INTERACTION, AND INSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY<br />
Room LaSalle 3, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Lee D. Walker, University of South Carolina<br />
Paper Strategic Anticipation in a Judicial Hierarchy<br />
Kirk A. Randazzo, University of Kentucky<br />
Overview: I examine whether appellate judges strategically<br />
anticipate actions taken later by the Supreme Court when they<br />
decide current cases.<br />
Paper The Determinants of Judicial Independence: A Study of Latin<br />
America, 1950-2002<br />
Julio Rios-Figueroa, CIDE, Mexico<br />
Overview: I analyze the conditions under which and the reasons<br />
why politicians delegate authority to judges and/or the judiciary in<br />
Latin American countries from 1950 to 2002.<br />
Paper Gender, Ideology and Corruption: Explaining Attitudes<br />
Toward Judicial Separation in Latin America<br />
Lee D. Walker, University of South Carolina<br />
Overview: I develop and explain an attitudinal measure of judicial<br />
separation across 17 Latin American countries. Gender, political<br />
ideology and corruption attitudes are factors in citizen’s decision<br />
to separate the judiciary from political society.<br />
Disc. Jeffrey Staton, Florida State University<br />
Lee D. Walker, University of South Carolina<br />
41-22 JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING DURING TIMES<br />
OF WAR<br />
Room Burnham 1, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Cynthia L. Ostberg, University of the Pacific<br />
Paper The Dynamic Effects of War on Supreme Court Liberalism<br />
Naser L. Javaid, Stony Brook University<br />
Overview: This paper seeks to examine the effects of war on<br />
Supreme Court liberalism in cases involving civil rights or<br />
liberties claims.<br />
Paper The Tension Between Politics and Justice: German Courts<br />
and the 9/11 Suspect Trials<br />
Shawn M. Boyne, University of Wisconsin<br />
Overview: This paper examines how politics shaped the 9/11<br />
suspect trials in Germany and led to charges that German courts<br />
chose to protect the defendant's rights at the expense of America's<br />
security concerns.<br />
Paper Courts and the Rights of Terrorists<br />
Michael R. Reinhard, Millsaps College<br />
Amber Davids, Millsaps College<br />
Overview: Drawing on field work in Afghanistan and a range of<br />
historical examples, we argue that the expansion of courts and<br />
legal decision making at the expense of executive and military<br />
decison makers will result in less justice rather than more.<br />
Disc. Brett Curry, Georgia Southern University<br />
Tobias T. Gibson, Monmouth College<br />
Page | 128<br />
42-3 REASONING, DECISION-MAKING, AND<br />
PRECEDENT<br />
Room Clark 5, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Trenton Davis, Northern Illinois University<br />
Paper Modes of Legal Reasoning and Justifying Legal Outcomes<br />
Anna O. Law, DePaul University<br />
Overview: In a legal opinion, judges need to justify their<br />
decisions. How do they do this? Do they cite legal doctrine or a<br />
legal principle like due process? Do they rubber stamp the<br />
decisions of Congress and the Executive?<br />
Paper The Federal Judicial Hierarchy and<br />
Reapportionment/Redistricting Cases<br />
John F. Ryan, Bates College<br />
Overview: This project investigates the federal judicial hierarchy<br />
(and competing explanations) by analyzing the uses of Supreme<br />
Court precedent by federal lower-court judges, in<br />
reapportionment/redistricting cases (1965-1993).<br />
Paper Rethinking Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability<br />
Alan Tarr, Rutgers University<br />
Overview: This paper analyzes and critiques prevailing<br />
understandings of judicial independence and judicial<br />
accountability and offers a more defensible version of these aims<br />
and of how they might be achieved.<br />
Paper Assessing the "Rehnquist Revolution": Examining Lower<br />
Court Compliance with Lopez, Printz and Morrison<br />
Alan M. Tauber, University of South Carolina<br />
Overview: This paper examines whether the so-called "Rehnquist<br />
Revolution" in federalism was carried out in the Courts of Appeal.<br />
Disc. Carl M. Dibble, University of Michigan<br />
44-5 TOPICS IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS<br />
Room Parlor E, 6 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Min-hyung Kim, University of Washington<br />
Paper Indian Gaming and State-Level Constraints on Tribal <strong>Political</strong><br />
Influence<br />
Steven A. Light, University of North Dakota<br />
Overview: Using a case study of recent events in Minnesota, this<br />
paper asks and answers two key questions concerning tribal-state<br />
intergovernmental relations today: How do tribes use gaming<br />
revenue to interact with state legal and political systems?<br />
Paper Provisional Liberty: The Evolution of Libertas in State<br />
Constitutions<br />
Sean R. Boutin, Cornell University<br />
Overview: This paper introduces a new method for cataloguing<br />
civil liberty provisions within state constitutions. It traces the<br />
temporal development for all 50 states from 1789-2006 and<br />
analyzes the categorical variance in visions of civil liberty.<br />
Paper The Land of Whose Father? The Politics of American Indian<br />
Land Settlements<br />
Anne F. B. Flaherty, Duke University<br />
Overview: How can small and institutionally powerless groups<br />
win concessions from the powerful? This paper explores this<br />
question in the context of American Indian land claims and<br />
explains why different tribal claims have had such varied<br />
settlement outcomes.<br />
Paper Strange Bedfellows: Interstate Cooperation, 1960-2000<br />
Neal D. Woods, University of South Carolina<br />
Ann O. M. Bowman, University of South Carolina<br />
Overview: Using an original dataset, we test theories of interstate<br />
cooperation through pooled event count models of dyadic state<br />
participation in interstate compacts.<br />
Disc. Neal D. Woods, University of South Carolina<br />
Juliet F. Gainsborough, Bentley College