2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2007 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
23-3 INTERNET AND NEW CAMPAIGNING<br />
TECHNOLOGIES<br />
Room Salon 7, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Margaret Carne, Rhodes College<br />
Paper Campaigning on the Internet<br />
Joe L. Gaziano, Lewis University<br />
Laurette Liesen, Lewis University<br />
Overview: This paper examines how statewide campaigns are<br />
conducted over the Internet. It analyzes how this form of<br />
campaigning is similar to and different from the traditional model<br />
of campaigning.<br />
Paper Financing Primaries 1980-2008: Hosting Fundraisers, Web-<br />
Hosted Fundraising<br />
Christopher C. Hull, Georgetown University<br />
Overview: Have new money-gathering tools transformed, or just<br />
improved, presidential primary campaign fundraising? This paper<br />
analyzes dollar flows from Bush vs. Reagan in 1980 bout through<br />
Dean vs. Kerry in 2004, with a peek into 2008 fundraising as well.<br />
Paper The Rise of Consumer-Based Campaigns<br />
Richard J. Semiatin, American University<br />
Overview: Campaigns are changing from being candidate-driven<br />
races to being consumer-driven races. Technology is permanently<br />
changing campaigns.<br />
Paper Electronic Grassroots: Measuring the Impact of the Internet<br />
on the Campaign<br />
Kevin M. Wagner, Florida Atlantic University<br />
Jason Gainous, University of Louisville<br />
Overview: Using a sample of U.S. Congressional districts, we<br />
estimate both the quality and quantity of the campaign’s Internet<br />
presence for the incumbent and challenger and correlate those<br />
measures with electoral success.<br />
Disc. Donald A. Zinman, Grand Valley State University<br />
24-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: ELECTORAL<br />
SYSTEMS AND REPRESENTATION<br />
Room State, 4 th Floor, Table 1, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Presenter The Green Machine: Environmental Constituents and<br />
Congressional Voting<br />
Sarah E. Anderson, Stanford University<br />
Overview: This paper finds that Members of Congress respond to<br />
district membership in environmental groups by voting more proenvironmental.<br />
It assesses whether polarization has had an impact<br />
on how moderates respond to their constituency.<br />
Presenter Descriptive Representation in Congressional Offices<br />
Curt Ziniel, University of California, Riverside<br />
Overview: Racial demographics of the district are a better<br />
indicator of Congressional staff racial demographics than<br />
Members’ of Congress own race, party, or ideology. This has<br />
important implications for the measurement of representation in<br />
Congress.<br />
24-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: REPRESENTATION<br />
IN U.S. STATES<br />
Room State, 4 th Floor, Table 2, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Presenter Who Leads, Who Follows? The Nature of Representation in<br />
California, 1996-2006<br />
Delia Bailey, California Institute of Technology<br />
Betsy Sinclair, California Institute of Technology<br />
Overview: We examine roll call data from the California state<br />
assembly and election returns on state ballot propositions to<br />
explore the relationship between constituency preferences and<br />
legislative behavior and to test hypotheses about the nature of<br />
representation.<br />
Presenter Who State Legislators Represent: Lessons From Three States<br />
Justin T. Gollob, Temple University<br />
Overview: Evidence from a three state mail survey of state<br />
legislators shows that representation is not as confined to district<br />
boundaries as once thought, and that previous explanations of<br />
extra-district areal orientations (geo-political foci) are incomplete.<br />
25-5 THE POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF INCOME<br />
INEQUALITY<br />
Room Salon 9, 3 rd Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Joe Soss, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />
Paper On the Determinants of Social Trust in the United States<br />
Christian Bjornskov, University of Aarhus<br />
Overview: This paper explores the determinants of trust in 48 U.S.<br />
states across three periods. The results show support for the<br />
detrimental effects of income inequality but no or little support for<br />
alternative theories.<br />
Paper The Effect of Income Inequality on <strong>Political</strong> Attitudes and<br />
Behavior<br />
James C. Garand, Louisiana State University<br />
Kim Nguyen, Louisiana State University<br />
Overview: We explore how income inequality affects turnout,<br />
political efficacy, and political trust. We consider direct and<br />
interaction effects of income inequality using data from the 2000<br />
American National Election and state estimates of income<br />
inequality.<br />
Paper Perceiving Inequality: Examining Contextual Influences on<br />
Public Opinion<br />
Amber M. Wichowsky, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />
Overview: Linking data from the 2002 ANES and the U.S.<br />
Census, this paper examines community-level contextual<br />
influences, including racial and class composition, economic<br />
heterogeneity and religious diversity, on public opinion towards<br />
income inequality.<br />
Disc. Joe Soss, University of Wisconsin, Madison<br />
David C. Wilson, University of Delaware<br />
26-5 POLITICAL HABIT AND POLITICAL<br />
PSYCHOLOGY: WHY CITIZENS PARTICIPATE<br />
Room Clark 9, 7 th Floor, Thur at 4:25 pm<br />
Chair Christopher F. Karpowitz, Brigham Young University<br />
Paper Persistence in <strong>Political</strong> Participation<br />
Marc N. Meredith, Stanford University<br />
Overview: Discontinuities imposed by voting age restrictions are<br />
used to identify the effects of past turnout on individuals’<br />
participation decisions. The analysis reveals the effects of voting<br />
age restrictions persist when they are no longer binding.<br />
Paper Repeated Turnout as a Habit<br />
Jacob M. Montgomery, Duke University<br />
John H. Aldrich, Duke University<br />
Wendy Wood, Duke University<br />
Ashley Taylor, Duke University<br />
Overview: Why are some people repeat voters? Using data from<br />
the 1972-1976 ANES panel study, we demonstrated that the<br />
strength of voting habits—established through frequent past<br />
voting in a stable context—can account for some instances of<br />
repeated voting.<br />
Paper The Nexus of <strong>Political</strong> Efficacy and <strong>Political</strong> Learning: An<br />
HLM Analysis of the Development of <strong>Political</strong> Engagement<br />
Elizabeth Beaumont, University of Minnesota<br />
Jeff Greene, University of Maryland<br />
Judith Torney-Purta, University of Maryland<br />
Overview: Explores relative influence of SES, civic background,<br />
and other individual characteristics vis-à-vis contextual peer<br />
effects and political learning experiences on development of<br />
internal efficacy, then examines how these factors predict<br />
participation.<br />
Paper Do Happier People Participate More? Life Satisfaction and<br />
Civic Engagement<br />
Michael J. Keane, University of Notre Dame<br />
Patrick J. Flavin, University of Notre Dame<br />
Overview: Are citizens who are happier with their lives more<br />
involved in politics and community affairs? We examine the<br />
relationship between subjective life satisfaction and civic<br />
engagement as mediated through traditional predictors of<br />
participation.<br />
Disc. Casey A. Klofstad, University of Miami<br />
Evan Parker-Stephen, University of North Carolina<br />
Page | 123