Program Book - Master Brewers Association of the Americas
Program Book - Master Brewers Association of the Americas
Program Book - Master Brewers Association of the Americas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
O-46<br />
Rapid detection and identification <strong>of</strong> beer spoilage lactic acid<br />
bacteria by microcolony method<br />
SHIZUKA ASANO (1), Kazumaru Iijima (1), Koji Suzuki (1), Yasuo<br />
Motoyama (2), Tomoo Ogata (1), Yasushi Kitagawa (1)<br />
(1) Research Laboratories <strong>of</strong> Brewing Technology, Asahi breweries,<br />
Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan; (2) Department <strong>of</strong> Research & Development<br />
Strategy, Asahi Breweries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan<br />
In <strong>the</strong> brewing industry, microbiological quality <strong>of</strong> beer products has<br />
been traditionally ensured by culture methods, which detect colonies<br />
grown on selective media. Although regarded as a reliable approach<br />
for microbiological quality control (QC) in breweries, <strong>the</strong>se methods<br />
are time-consuming and require additional confirmatory tests<br />
before any corrective actions are taken. In order to reduce <strong>the</strong> time<br />
for microbiological QC tests, several rapid alternatives have been<br />
proposed, including <strong>the</strong> fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)<br />
technique. Since <strong>the</strong> FISH method directly detects beer-spoilage<br />
bacteria with a species-specific fluorescein-labeled probe targeted<br />
to rRNA, it enables us to identify contaminants in a speciesspecific<br />
manner without culturing. The FISH method also shows<br />
sensitivity sufficiently high to detect a single beer-spoilage bacterial<br />
cell. Never<strong>the</strong>less, due to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> false-positive noise<br />
signals, it may require fur<strong>the</strong>r confirmatory tests for <strong>the</strong> definitive<br />
interpretation <strong>of</strong> test results to be made. To solve this problem, we<br />
evaluated a microcolony method for <strong>the</strong> detection and identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> beer-spoilage lactic acid bacteria (LAB). In this approach,<br />
bacterial cells were trapped onto a polycarbonate membrane filter<br />
and <strong>the</strong>n cultured on ABD medium, a medium that allows highly<br />
specific detection <strong>of</strong> beer-spoilage LAB strains. After a short-time<br />
incubation, viable cells forming microcolonies were stained with<br />
CFDA and counted with <strong>the</strong> µFinder inspection system. As a result,<br />
all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beer-spoilage LAB strains examined in this study were able<br />
to be detected within three days <strong>of</strong> incubation. The specificity <strong>of</strong> this<br />
method was found to be exceptionally high and even discriminate<br />
intra-species differences in <strong>the</strong> beer-spoilage ability <strong>of</strong> LAB strains.<br />
These results indicate that our microcolony approach allows rapid<br />
and specific detection <strong>of</strong> beer-spoilage LAB strains with inexpensive<br />
CFDA staining. For fur<strong>the</strong>r confirmation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species status <strong>of</strong><br />
detected strains, subsequent treatment with species-specific FISH<br />
probes was also shown as effective for identifying CFDA-detected<br />
microcolonies. In addition, no false-positive results arising from<br />
noise signals were recognized for <strong>the</strong> CFDA-staining and FISH<br />
methods, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparatively much stronger signals<br />
obtained from microcolonies. Taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> developed<br />
microcolony method was demonstrated to be a rapid and highly<br />
specific countermeasure against beer-spoilage LAB and compared<br />
favorably with <strong>the</strong> conventional culture methods.<br />
Shizuka Asano received a M.S. degree in microbiology from Tokyo<br />
University, Japan, in 2004, where she majored in fungal genetics<br />
under Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Kitamoto’s guidance. She joined Asahi Breweries,<br />
Ltd. in April 2004. Since September 2005, she has been working<br />
on microbiological quality assurance in breweries and developing<br />
detection technology for beer-spoilage microorganisms.<br />
88<br />
O-47<br />
Agar gradient-plate technique for determining beer-spoilage<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> Lactobacillus and Pediococcus isolates<br />
MONIQUE HAAKENSEN (1), Alison Schubert (1), Barry Ziola (1)<br />
(1) University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada<br />
To date, identification <strong>of</strong> beer-spoilage bacteria has largely taken two<br />
approaches: identification <strong>of</strong> specific species <strong>of</strong> bacteria regardless<br />
<strong>of</strong> ability to grow in beer or <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> spoilage-associated<br />
genes. The dilemma with <strong>the</strong>se methods is that <strong>the</strong>y are ei<strong>the</strong>r overly<br />
inclusive (i.e., detect all bacteria <strong>of</strong> a given species regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
spoilage potential) or overly selective (i.e., rely upon individual,<br />
putative spoilage-associated genes). As such, our goal was to<br />
design a method to assess <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> bacteria to spoil beer that<br />
is independent <strong>of</strong> speciation or genetic background. Our solution<br />
to this problem is an agar gradient-plate technique. A gradient<br />
is created by pouring a base layer <strong>of</strong> MRS agar containing hopcompounds<br />
on a slant in a square Petri plate. Once solidified, <strong>the</strong><br />
Petri plate is laid flat, and MRS agar is poured on top to create a layer<br />
through which <strong>the</strong> hop-compounds must diffuse. Bacterial isolates<br />
are stamped onto <strong>the</strong> plate using <strong>the</strong> side <strong>of</strong> a glass microscope<br />
slide and growth <strong>of</strong> isolates along <strong>the</strong> gradient <strong>of</strong> hop-compounds<br />
is measured to determine resistance. Through <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />
this assay, we have made <strong>the</strong> additional finding that <strong>the</strong> basis for<br />
<strong>the</strong> ability to grow in beer differs for Lactobacillus and Pediococcus<br />
isolates. In contrast to Pediococcus isolates, hop-resistance alone<br />
is not optimal for identification <strong>of</strong> Lactobacillus beer-spoilage<br />
ability (76–82% accuracy in isolates tested). Instead, <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />
ethanol (added to a concentration <strong>of</strong> 5% to both layers <strong>of</strong> MRS agar),<br />
in addition to hop-compounds, is necessary for accurate prediction<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> Lactobacillus isolates to grow in beer (100% accuracy<br />
in isolates tested). In several instances, addition <strong>of</strong> ethanol to <strong>the</strong><br />
agar gradient plates produced an enhanced resistance <strong>of</strong> beerspoilage<br />
Lactobacillus isolates to hop-compounds, possibly due to<br />
an induced change in membrane permeability. The opposite effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> ethanol was also observed, but only for bacteria unable to grow in<br />
beer. Testing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gradient plate technique was performed on 85<br />
Lactobacillus and 50 Pediococcus isolates and was highly accurate<br />
in differentiating between isolates capable <strong>of</strong> growing in beer and<br />
benign bacteria (chi-square P < 0.0005) in only 36 hours. Our agar<br />
gradient-plate technique provides a rapid and simple solution to <strong>the</strong><br />
dilemma <strong>of</strong> assessing <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> Lactobacillus and Pediococcus<br />
isolates to grow in beer and provides new insights into <strong>the</strong> different<br />
strategies used by <strong>the</strong>se bacteria to survive under <strong>the</strong> stringent<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> beer.<br />
Monique Haakensen received a B.S. (Hon.) degree in microbiology<br />
and immunology from <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan, Canada,<br />
in 2004. In 2006, she completed <strong>the</strong> Certification <strong>Program</strong> in<br />
Bioinformatics hosted by <strong>the</strong> Canadian Genetic Diseases Network.<br />
Monique is currently at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan pursuing a<br />
Ph.D. degree in health sciences, with a focus on <strong>the</strong> various aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> lactic acid bacteria to grow in beer.