24.01.2013 Views

German Catalog 2006 USE THIS ONE.qxp - Michael Skurnik Wines

German Catalog 2006 USE THIS ONE.qxp - Michael Skurnik Wines

German Catalog 2006 USE THIS ONE.qxp - Michael Skurnik Wines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

Principles of Selection in this Portfolio<br />

Visit everyone, taste everything, select what I liked<br />

the best, and then tell why. Nothing new or revolutionary.<br />

The old broker-system is as good as dead now, and<br />

most of you don’t remember it anyway. The marketing of<br />

<strong>German</strong> estate wines has at last aligned with their smallbatch<br />

production structure.<br />

My own portfolio is slowly changing to reflect<br />

changes on the “scene” and amongst the growers.<br />

Generations change, a few people coast on auto-pilot as<br />

they get older, new ones come along. I want to be loyal to<br />

my growers, and I’m fond of many of them and friends<br />

with quite a few. It always hurts to cut an estate, but the<br />

person most deserving of my loyalty is you, dear reader<br />

and customer.<br />

At first I was deliberately ecumenical. I wanted to<br />

show you many facets of <strong>German</strong> wine and many differ-<br />

ent ways for it to be good. I still do. I am fond of the quirky.<br />

But I’m also realistic about how the wines are sold.<br />

You can’t visit each estate one-at-a-time like I do.<br />

Such visits have advantages and disadvantages. You see<br />

the wines in context, as they should be seen. But you<br />

don’t see them in what Bob Parker likes to call “peergroup”<br />

conditions; i.e., with a bunch of similar wines<br />

from other growers. We show the wines in portfolio tastings<br />

wherein a big ol’ slew of wines are lined up to be<br />

tasted alongside one another, exactly contrary to how<br />

they should be tasted or to any aims their makers had for<br />

them. But what choice do we have?<br />

The results are predictable. Some wines “show” better<br />

than others. Fragrant wines with lots of primary fruit.<br />

Spritzy wines. Even (ulp) sweeter wines. If your wine<br />

has quirks or tics, if it’s asymmetrical, earthy and ornery,<br />

it will be laid to waste in “peer-group” tastings. (What<br />

actual consumer ever says “Let’s see, tonight we’re having<br />

a big greasy pizza: let’s line up sixty-two Chianti<br />

Classicos and see how they ‘show’!”)<br />

From a zenith of over SIXTY growers this little family<br />

has been reduced to barely under forty, and it might have<br />

gone down as far as it should go. Demand is rising and one<br />

remains alert to the eventual demise of estates with no visible<br />

heirs. Plus I’m a curious cuss and don’t want to sit in<br />

my house with the windows closed. It may look quixotic to<br />

add agencies to a portfolio already numbering more than<br />

forty, but I suspect many of us in the fine wine biz have to<br />

struggle to reconcile our aesthetics with what passes for<br />

“common sense” as, ahem, businesspersons. For me, unless<br />

the businessman’s point is beyond argument, the aesthete<br />

usually prevails. Somebody has to hurl beauty in the wan<br />

face of common sense, and it might as well be me!<br />

Selecting was easier in the old days. <strong>German</strong> wine was<br />

unpopular and therefore inconspicuous, and it was a<br />

buyer’s market. I was at liberty to take only what I wanted.<br />

These days, we’re selling more and are therefore more consequential<br />

to the grower; if I pass on a certain wine it can<br />

play havoc with his plans. And bruise his ego. It’s all very<br />

Realpolitik, I suppose, and I sometimes wonder why I care<br />

so much about my precious “standards,” but always I<br />

come to the same answer. It’s because I want to keep faith<br />

with you. We may disagree, you and I, we may not like the<br />

same wines, but you deserve to know that I like what I say<br />

I like, and I won’t ask you to buy a wine I don’t endorse.<br />

But how do I reconcile this with the political need to<br />

placate a grower?<br />

There are certain wines with what I’d call iconic<br />

status. These wines belong in the market so you can<br />

make up your own mind about them. There are other<br />

wines with which I have some small aesthetic cavil or<br />

other, some minor but discernible imperfection which<br />

might bother me more than it would you. If the wine is<br />

otherwise worthy, you should see it.<br />

Thus I will make certain wines available which I do<br />

not in fact select. These wines will not have my name on<br />

the label, and will be clearly identified within this text.<br />

Bear in mind I’m not trying to create a lower-class of<br />

Theise-rejects. Yucky wine is simply yucky wine and<br />

you’ll never be offered it from me in any form. I am<br />

merely allowing you access to important wines with<br />

either iconic status or with minor imperfections, and<br />

identifying these wines for you.<br />

A CAUTIONARY NOTE: one thing I will not do is<br />

to try and seduce agencies from competing portfolios. It<br />

isn’t right and it isn’t even necessary. This year’s Gault<br />

Millau guide—a kind of classification of estates updated<br />

annually—shows nearly 150 estates of “classifiable”<br />

quality in the most important six regions AL<strong>ONE</strong> who<br />

have no American importer. Most of my competitors are<br />

honorable people. One dude has been paying heavy<br />

court to a number of estates in my portfolio. When he<br />

can’t get the wines he sometimes gray-markets them. I’m<br />

tempted to call such behavior evil, but it isn’t. It’s just<br />

pathetic. Still, the man has taste!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!