24.01.2013 Views

German Catalog 2006 USE THIS ONE.qxp - Michael Skurnik Wines

German Catalog 2006 USE THIS ONE.qxp - Michael Skurnik Wines

German Catalog 2006 USE THIS ONE.qxp - Michael Skurnik Wines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2003<br />

I doubt if I tasted more than a few the past several<br />

weeks. In a sense growers didn’t need to show them — 2005<br />

has most of the same virtues but with more grip and typicity<br />

— and in another sense those estates with still-unsold<br />

`03 Auslesen have given up the fight, at least for now. The<br />

really smart ones will hold wine back and re-release them<br />

as “library wines” in 2014, at which time we’ll suddenly<br />

realize how we underrated this amazing vintage.<br />

I paid a visit to a producer I hadn’t seen for years,<br />

whom I used to represent but no longer do. It was a<br />

catch-up-with-old-friends sort of visit but of course there<br />

were a bunch of wines lined up to taste. Among them<br />

2003s.<br />

Tasting several typically outstanding wines of this<br />

most remarkable vintage of my adult life, I mused “You<br />

know, at least in my country this vintage was almost universally<br />

misunderstood.” I was taken aback when my<br />

friend stopped dead still, affixed me with a powerful<br />

stare and declaimed “Thank you! Yes, it does my heart<br />

good to hear those words . . . .”<br />

OK, here’s the scoop. I have very few 2003s left to<br />

sell, and thus no mercantile reason to make this claim. I<br />

happen to believe it. 2003 is at its best a great vintage, a<br />

monument of the <strong>German</strong> wine culture, and will in the<br />

fullness of time become the stuff of legend. Of course<br />

there are plain dull wines from ‘03. But think about it: if<br />

you’ve ever been there and visited growers, and if you’re<br />

lucky enough to be given a bottle from the sanctorum to<br />

taste, what vintage is it? Very likely a ‘76, and if you’re<br />

really inner-circle material, a ‘59.<br />

Thirty years from now your kids will be given 2003s<br />

to accord them just the same honor. Those who poohpoohed<br />

this vintage, affected to despise it, or simply<br />

ignored it are guilty of a supreme piece of short-sighted<br />

foolishness.<br />

I have a share of blame as well. For twenty years I<br />

have inculcated a clientele who prize the ordinary<br />

virtues of <strong>German</strong> Riesling; its lightness, brilliance, minerality<br />

and subtlety. Then 2003 comes thumping down<br />

the path and I want you guys to like it too, though it sort<br />

of flies in the face of everything I’ve been telling you. But<br />

the thing is, it really doesn’t. The many great `03s are<br />

more explicit than usual, and certainly fuller-bodied, but<br />

neither of these facets precludes greatness unless our definition<br />

of greatness is very fussy indeed.<br />

<strong>German</strong> Riesling is always musical. Often (perhaps<br />

usually) it’s like chamber music, pensive, intricate, manylayered<br />

and compelling of attention. In 2003 it was music<br />

of the very same composer, only this time symphonic,<br />

even anthemic. Look, I’m a baseball purist; I like a pitcher’s<br />

duel and I don’t require a lot of “action” to stay into<br />

the game. But I also love a slugfest. Provided the thing is<br />

essentially fine, I get to choose which way it’s fine. And I<br />

think 2003 was a beneficence the likes of which we are<br />

seldom given. I am quite sure that some of you weren’t<br />

yet born in 1976. We ignore these monument-vintages at<br />

our peril.<br />

The only “problem” with 2003 (the good ones, I<br />

mean) is it produced a plethora of the kind of wines we<br />

don’t drink much of—Auslese and TBAs.<br />

This is a modern “problem” brought on as an ironic<br />

unplanned consequence of a huge improvement in<br />

overall quality. And perhaps climate-change as well.<br />

Think back to the ‘70s and ‘80s: three Auslese-vintages<br />

in the ‘70s (‘71,’75,’76), four in the ‘80s (‘83, ‘88, ‘89,<br />

and maybe ‘85), but in the ‘90s? ALL of them. And in<br />

the new century? ALL of them. The new generation of<br />

growers are picking better grapes and riper grapes<br />

than ever before, and this is, we all agree, a good thing.<br />

Except we don’t want to drink the results!<br />

2002<br />

It took awhile, but this vintage has started evolving<br />

its true fruit, and it now breathes a soul-satisfying lyric<br />

fragrance; it is more than “dear and winsome” as I wrote<br />

last year. It has certain things in common with 2004,<br />

though even now some ‘02s still show rather spiky acids<br />

while the ‘04s are more balanced and juicy. Still, good<br />

2002s are extremely attractive now; I found myself<br />

yearning to be British, since that market tends to appreciate<br />

bottle-aged wines more than ours does. Much as I<br />

always liked ‘02, I suspect I may have underrated it.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!