Rob van Hest Capture-recapture Methods in Surveillance - RePub ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 8.2 Number, proportion and distribution of tuberculosis cases between the data sources after record-linkage in England between 1999 and 2002 and correction for estimated and projected proportions of false-positive records. N total NOT + LAB + HOSP N (%) HOSP + NOT N (%) LAB + HOSP N (%) NOT + LAB N (%) HOSP ‡ N (%) LAB † N (%) Year/Data source NOT* N (%) 1999 Record linkage results § 1764 (21.8%) 678 (8.4%) 1649 (20.4%) 1575 (19.4%) 111 (1.4%) 903 (11.1%) 1417 (17.5%) 8097 Correction for TOM 1692 (21.2%) 678 (8.5%) 1649 (20.6%) 1575 (19.7%) 111 (1.4%) 866 (10.8%) 1417 (17.7%) 7988 Correction for MOTT and falsepositive Hospital records # 1692 (25.0%) 678 (10.0%) 444 (6.5%) 1575 (23.2%) 111 (1.6%) 866 (12.8%) 1417 (20.9%) 6783 2000 Record linkage results § 2205 (26.8%) 795 (9.6%) 1313 (16.0%) 1324 (16.1%) 148 (1.8%) 1037 (12.6%) 1409 (17.1%) 8231 Correction for TOM 2115 (26.1%) 795 (9.8%) 1313 (16.2%) 1324 (16.3%) 148 (1.8%) 994 (12.3%) 1409 (17.4%) 8098 Correction for MOTT and falsepositive Hospital records # 2115 (29.6%) 795 (11.1%) 354 (5.0%) 1324 (18.6%) 148 (2.1%) 994 (13.9%) 1409 (19.7%) 7139 2001 Record linkage results § 2148 (25.2%) 527 (6.2%) 1411 (16.6%) 1790 (21.0%) 109 (1.3%) 996 (11.7%) 1534 (18.0%) 8515 Correction for TOM 2060 (24.6%) 527 (6.3%) 1411 (16.8%) 1790 (21.3%) 109 (1.3%) 955 (11.4%) 1534 (18.3%) 8386 Correction for MOTT and falsepositive Hospital records # 2060 (28.0%) 527 (7.2%) 380 (5.2%) 1790 (24.3%) 109 (1.5%) 955 (13.0%) 1534 (20.9%) 7355 2002 Record linkage results § 1992 (23.4%) 478 (5.6%) 1360 (16.0%) 1814 (21.3%) 144 (1.7%) 1016 (11.9%) 1715 (20.1%) 8519 Correction for TOM 1910 (22.8%) 478 (5.7%) 1360 (16.2%) 1814 (21.6%) 144 (1.7%) 974 (11.6%) 1715 (20.4%) 8395 1910 (25.8%) 478 (6.5%) 366 (4.9%) 1814 (24.5%) 144 (1.9%) 974 (13.2%) 1715 (23.2%) 7401 Correction for MOTT and falsepositive Hospital records # * NOT: Notification data source; † LAB: Laboratory data source; ‡ HOSP: Hospital data source; § after correction for multiple links and exclusion of patient records with insufficient identifiers; after correction for estimated proportion of cases with diagnosis other than tuberculosis identified in the Treatment Outcome Monitoring (TOM) dataset; # after correction for estimated proportion of unlinked Hospital cases with diagnosis of Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT) infection and false-positive Hospital records
Table 8.3 Annual and overall observed number of tuberculosis cases after record-linkage and correction for false-positive records and annual and total observed source-specific coverage rates of notified, culture-confirmed and hospitalised tuberculosis cases in England between 1999 and 2002. Observed tuberculosis cases* Notification Laboratory Hospital Year Number (UI †) Number Percentage (UI) Number Percentage (UI) Number Percentage (UI) 1999 6783 (6640-7132) 5550 81.8 (77.8-83.6) 3781 55.7 (53.0-56.9) 2838 41.8 (40.6-44.7) 2000 7139 (7025-7417) 5842 81.8 (78.8-83.2) 3676 51.5 (49.6-52.3) 2905 40.7 (39.7-42.9) 2001 7355 (7233-7654) 6339 86.2 (82.8-87.6) 3960 53.8 (51.7-54.7) 2978 40.5 (39.5-42.8) 2002 7401 (7284-7689) 6413 86.7 (83.4-88.0) 4151 56.1 (54.0-57.0) 3199 43.2 (42.3-45.4) All 28 678 (28 182-29 892) 24 144 84.1 (80.7-85.6) 15 568 54.3 (52.1-55.3) 11 920 41.6 (40.5-43.9) * Case-ascertaiment; † UI: uncertainty interval
Page 1 and 2:
Capture-recapture Methods in Survei
Page 3 and 4:
Colofon Capture-recapture methods i
Page 5 and 6:
Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof.dr
Page 8:
Contents Page 1 Introduction 9 2 Me
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 1.1 Assessing completenes
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 94% among AIDS patients w
Page 15 and 16:
Table 1.1 Objectives, methods, data
Page 17 and 18:
Researchers Objective Method Data-s
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 source capture-recapture
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 32. Bradley BL, Kerr KM,
Page 24 and 25:
2 Methodology of capture-recapture
Page 26 and 27:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36:
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 3.1 Application of captur
Page 41 and 42:
Table 3.1 Published capture-recaptu
Page 43 and 44:
Disease Authors Objective Method Da
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 3 3.3 References 1. Hook EB
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 3 52. Reintjes R, Termorshu
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 4 Abstract The aim of this
Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 4 Methods Nearly all Dutch
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 4 Table 4.2 The number of m
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 4 diagnosis. Other patients
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 4 stratify the population i
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 4 25. Lambeth, Southwark an
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 5 Abstract To estimate inci
Page 67 and 68: Chapter 5 patients. Capture-recaptu
Page 69 and 70: Chapter 5 Figure 5.1 Four regions o
Page 71 and 72: Chapter 5 Hospital records From 385
Page 73 and 74: Chapter 5 Table 5.1 Epidemiological
Page 75 and 76: Table 5.2 Number and proportion of
Page 77 and 78: Chapter 5 cautious about the associ
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 5 Incidence of community-ac
Page 81 and 82: Chapter 6 Abstract The aim of this
Page 83 and 84: Chapter 6 3. Hospitalised patients
Page 85 and 86: Chapter 6 Record-linkage of all 537
Page 87 and 88: Chapter 6 Figure 6.1 Schematic view
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 6 Table 6.2 Total and strat
Page 91 and 92: Chapter 6 administrative discrepanc
Page 93 and 94: Chapter 6 the patients, and complet
Page 96 and 97: 7 Undetected burden of tuberculosis
Page 98 and 99: Introduction Underreporting of tube
Page 100 and 101: Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
Page 102 and 103: Table 7.1 Total and subset numbers
Page 104 and 105: Table 7.2 Capture-recapture estimat
Page 106 and 107: Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
Page 108: Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 8 Abstract In 1999 the Enha
Page 113 and 114: Chapter 8 bacteriological confirmat
Page 115: Chapter 8 Results Table 8.1 shows t
Page 119 and 120: Table 8.4 Annual and overall estima
Page 121 and 122: Chapter 8 interaction however, i.e.
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 8 shows that observed under
Page 126 and 127: 9 Estimating the coverage of tuberc
Page 128 and 129: Introduction Estimating targeted mo
Page 130 and 131: Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
Page 136 and 137: References Estimating targeted mobi
Page 138 and 139: 10 Estimating infectious diseases i
Page 140 and 141: Introduction Estimating infectious
Page 142 and 143: Estimating infectious disease incid
Page 144 and 145: Study Disease and number of patient
Page 146 and 147: 4. Gallay A, Vaillant V, Bouvet P,
Page 148 and 149: Table 10.3 Comparison of the variou
Page 150 and 151: Discussion Estimating infectious di
Page 156: Estimating infectious disease incid
Page 159 and 160: Chapter 11 The aim of this thesis i
Page 161 and 162: Chapter 11 overestimation of the nu
Page 163 and 164: Chapter 11 clinicians to the Public
Page 165 and 166: Chapter 11 operation with the chest
Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 11 of the proportion of fal
Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 11 Question 3: What is the
Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 11 11.2 Some findings of th
Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 11 • To improve timelines
Page 176 and 177:
Summary Summary Surveillance is an
Page 178 and 179:
Summary linkage of notification and
Page 180 and 181:
Samenvatting Samenvatting Surveilla
Page 182 and 183:
Samenvatting subgroepen binnen de b
Page 184 and 185:
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements W
Page 186 and 187:
Curriculum vitae Rob van Hest was b
Page 188 and 189:
Publications This thesis Van Hest N
show all

Rob van Hest Capture-recapture Methods in Surveillance - RePub ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?