Infectious disease capture-<strong>recapture</strong> studies 25. Dechant EJ, Rigau-Perez JG. Hospitalizations for suspected dengue <strong>in</strong> Puerto Rico, 1991-1995: estimation by capture-<strong>recapture</strong> methods. The Puerto Rico Association of Epidemiologists. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 61: 574-8. 26. Hoque ME, Hope VT, Scragg R, Graham J. Under-notification of giardiasis <strong>in</strong> Auckland, New Zealand: a capture-<strong>recapture</strong> estimation. Epidemiol Infect 2005; 133: 71-9. 27. Christensen PB, Krarup HB, Niesters HG, Norder H, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Jeune B, Georgsen J. Outbreak of Hepatitis B among <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g drug users <strong>in</strong> Denmark. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Virol 2001; 22: 133-41. 28. Wu C, Chang HG, McNutt LA, Smith PF. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the mortality rate of hepatitis C us<strong>in</strong>g multiple data sources. Epidemiol Infect 2005; 133: 121-5. 29. Grijalva CG, Craig AS, Dupont WD, Bridges CB, Schrag SJ, Iwane MK, Schaffner W, Edwards KM, Griff<strong>in</strong> MR. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluenza hospitalizations among children. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12: 103-9. 30. Van den Broek J, Van Jaarsveld T, de Rijk A, Samson K, Patrobas P. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> method to assess the prevalence of disabled leprosy patients. Lepr Rev 2001; 72: 292-301. 31. Infuso A, Hubert B, Etienne J. Underreport<strong>in</strong>g of Legionnaires‘ disease <strong>in</strong> France: the case for more active surveillance. Euro Surveill 1998; 3: 48-50. 32. Nardone A, Decludt B, Jarraud S, Etienne J, Hubert B, Infuso A, Gallay A, Desenclos JC. Repeat capture<strong>recapture</strong> studies as part of the evaluation of the surveillance of Legionnaires' disease <strong>in</strong> France. Epidemiol Infect 2003; 131: 647-54. 33. Yadon ZE, Quigley MA, Davies CR, Rodrigues LC, Segura EL. Assessment of Leishmaniasis notification system <strong>in</strong> Santiago del Estero, Argent<strong>in</strong>a, 1990-1993. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001; 65: 27-30. 34. Brum L, Kupek E. Record l<strong>in</strong>kage and capture-<strong>recapture</strong> estimates for underreport<strong>in</strong>g of human leptospirosis <strong>in</strong> a Brazilian health district. Braz J Infect Dis 2005; 9: 515-20. 35. Deparis X, Pascal B, Baudon D. [Evaluation of the completeness of the epidemiological surveillance systems for malaria by the capture-<strong>recapture</strong> system <strong>in</strong> the French armies <strong>in</strong> l994]. Trop Med Int Health 1997; 2: 433-9. 36. Barat LM, Barnett BJ, Smol<strong>in</strong>ski MS, Espey DK, Levy CE, Zucker JE. Evaluation of malaria surveillance us<strong>in</strong>g retrospective, laboratory-based active case detection <strong>in</strong> four southwestern states, 1995. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 60: 910-4. 37. Wang WM, Gao Q, He HZ. [Application of capture-<strong>recapture</strong> method to adjust the number of malaria cases from report<strong>in</strong>g data]. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong B<strong>in</strong>g Za Zhi 2000; 18: 376. 38. Van <strong>Hest</strong> NA, Smit F, Verhave JP. Improv<strong>in</strong>g malaria notification <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands: results from a capture<strong>recapture</strong> study. Epidemiol Infect 2002; 129: 371-77. 39. Kle<strong>in</strong> S, Bosman A. Completeness of malaria notification <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands 1995-2003 assessed by capture<strong>recapture</strong> method. Euro Surveill 2005; 10: 244-6. 40. Van den Hof S, Smit C, Van Steenbergen JE, De Melker HE. Hospitalizations dur<strong>in</strong>g a measles epidemic <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands, 1999 to 2000. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21: 1146-50. 41. G<strong>in</strong>dler J, T<strong>in</strong>ker S, Markowitz L, Atk<strong>in</strong>son W, Dales L, Papania MJ. Acute measles mortality <strong>in</strong> the United States, 1987-2002. J Infect Dis 2004; 189: S69-77. 42. Faust<strong>in</strong>i A, Fano V, Sangalli M, Ferro S, Celesti L, Contegiacomo P, Renz<strong>in</strong>i V, Perucci CA. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidence of bacterial men<strong>in</strong>gitis with capture-<strong>recapture</strong> method, Lazio Region, Italy. Eur J Epidemiol 2000; 16: 843-8. 43. Izquierdo Carreno A, Matute Cruz P, Mart<strong>in</strong>ez Navarro F. [The use of the capture- <strong>recapture</strong> method <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the epidemiological men<strong>in</strong>gococcal disease monitor<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> Tenerife, Spa<strong>in</strong> (1999-2000)]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2003; 77: 701-11. 44. Breen E, Ghebrehewet S, Regan M, Thomson AP. How complete and accurate is men<strong>in</strong>gococcal disease notification? Commun Dis Public Health 2004; 7: 334-8. 45. Berghold C, Berghold A, Fulop G, Heuberger S, Strauss R, Zenz W. Invasive men<strong>in</strong>gococcal disease <strong>in</strong> Austria 2002: assessment of completeness of notification by comparison of two <strong>in</strong>dependent data sources. Wien Kl<strong>in</strong> Wochenschr 2006; 118: 31-5. 46. De Greeff SC, Spanjaard L, Dankert J, Hoebe CJ, Nagelkerke N, De Melker HE. Underreport<strong>in</strong>g of men<strong>in</strong>gococcal disease <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands: Results from a capture-<strong>recapture</strong> analysis based on three registration sources with correction for false-positive diagnoses. Eur J Epidemiol 2006; 21: 315-21. 47. Gj<strong>in</strong>i A, Stuart JM, George RC,Nichols T, Heyderman RS. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> analysis and pneumococcal men<strong>in</strong>gitis estimates <strong>in</strong> England. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10: 87-93. 48. Dev<strong>in</strong>e MJ, Bellis MA, Tocque K, Syed Q. Whoop<strong>in</strong>g cough surveillance <strong>in</strong> the north west of England. Commun Dis Public Health 1998; 1: 121-5. 49. Crowcroft NS, Andrews N, Rooney C, Brisson M, Miller E. Deaths from pertussis are underestimated <strong>in</strong> England. Arch Dis Child 2002; 86: 336-38. 50. Vitek CR, Pascual FB, Baughman AL, Murphy TV. Increase <strong>in</strong> deaths from pertussis among young <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> the United States <strong>in</strong> the 1990s. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22: 628-34. 51. Paddock CD, Holman RC, Krebs JW, Childs JE. Assess<strong>in</strong>g the magnitude of fatal Rocky Mounta<strong>in</strong> spotted fever <strong>in</strong> the United States: comparison of two national data sources. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2002; 67: 349-54. 49
Chapter 3 52. Re<strong>in</strong>tjes R, Termorshuizen F, <strong>van</strong> de Laar MJ. Assess<strong>in</strong>g the sensitivity of STD surveillance <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands: an application of the capture-<strong>recapture</strong> method. Epidemiol Infect 1999; 122: 97-102. 53. Trijbels-Smeulders M, Gerards LJ, M PC, de Jong P, <strong>van</strong> L<strong>in</strong>gen RA, Adriaanse AH, de Jonge GA, Kollee LA. Epidemiology of neonatal group B streptococcal disease <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands 1997-98. Paediatr Per<strong>in</strong>at Epidemiol 2002; 16: 334-41. 54. Gallay A, Vaillant V, Bouvet P, Grimont P, Desenclos JC. How many foodborne outbreaks of Salmonella <strong>in</strong>fection occurred <strong>in</strong> France <strong>in</strong> 1995? Application of the capture-<strong>recapture</strong> method to three surveillance systems. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 171-7. 55. Perez-Ciordia I, Ferrero M, Sanchez E, Abadias M, Mart<strong>in</strong>ez-Navarro F, Herrera D. [Salmonella enteritis <strong>in</strong> Huesca. 1996-1999]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Cl<strong>in</strong> 2002; 20: 16-21. 56. Goldman GS. Us<strong>in</strong>g capture-<strong>recapture</strong> methods to assess varicella <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong> a community under active surveillance. Vacc<strong>in</strong>e 2003; 21: 4250-5. 57. Bonhoeffer J, Baer G, Muehleisen B, Aebi C, Nadal D, Schaad UB, He<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ger U. Prospective surveillance of hospitalisations associated with varicella-zoster virus <strong>in</strong>fections <strong>in</strong> children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2005; 164: 366-70. 58. Jansson A, Arneborn M, Ekdahl K. Sensitivity of the Swedish statutory surveillance system for communicable diseases 1998-2002, assessed by the capture-<strong>recapture</strong> method. Epidemiol Infect 2005; 133: 401-7. 50
- Page 1 and 2: Capture-recapture Methods in Survei
- Page 3 and 4: Colofon Capture-recapture methods i
- Page 5 and 6: Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof.dr
- Page 8: Contents Page 1 Introduction 9 2 Me
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1 1.1 Assessing completenes
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 94% among AIDS patients w
- Page 15 and 16: Table 1.1 Objectives, methods, data
- Page 17 and 18: Researchers Objective Method Data-s
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1 source capture-recapture
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1 32. Bradley BL, Kerr KM,
- Page 24 and 25: 2 Methodology of capture-recapture
- Page 26 and 27: Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 28 and 29: Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 30 and 31: Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 32 and 33: Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 34 and 35: Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 36: Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 3.1 Application of captur
- Page 41 and 42: Table 3.1 Published capture-recaptu
- Page 43 and 44: Disease Authors Objective Method Da
- Page 45 and 46: Disease Authors Objective Method Da
- Page 47 and 48: Disease Authors Objective Method Da
- Page 49: Chapter 3 3.3 References 1. Hook EB
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 4 Abstract The aim of this
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 4 Methods Nearly all Dutch
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 4 Table 4.2 The number of m
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 4 diagnosis. Other patients
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 4 stratify the population i
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 4 25. Lambeth, Southwark an
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 5 Abstract To estimate inci
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 5 patients. Capture-recaptu
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 5 Figure 5.1 Four regions o
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 5 Hospital records From 385
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 5 Table 5.1 Epidemiological
- Page 75 and 76: Table 5.2 Number and proportion of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 5 cautious about the associ
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 5 Incidence of community-ac
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 6 Abstract The aim of this
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 6 3. Hospitalised patients
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 6 Record-linkage of all 537
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 6 Figure 6.1 Schematic view
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 6 Table 6.2 Total and strat
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 6 administrative discrepanc
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 6 the patients, and complet
- Page 96 and 97: 7 Undetected burden of tuberculosis
- Page 98 and 99: Introduction Underreporting of tube
- Page 100 and 101:
Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 7.1 Total and subset numbers
- Page 104 and 105:
Table 7.2 Capture-recapture estimat
- Page 106 and 107:
Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
- Page 108:
Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
- Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 8 Abstract In 1999 the Enha
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 8 bacteriological confirmat
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 8 Results Table 8.1 shows t
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 8.3 Annual and overall observ
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 8.4 Annual and overall estima
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 8 interaction however, i.e.
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 8 shows that observed under
- Page 126 and 127:
9 Estimating the coverage of tuberc
- Page 128 and 129:
Introduction Estimating targeted mo
- Page 130 and 131:
Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
- Page 132 and 133:
Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
- Page 134 and 135:
Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
- Page 136 and 137:
References Estimating targeted mobi
- Page 138 and 139:
10 Estimating infectious diseases i
- Page 140 and 141:
Introduction Estimating infectious
- Page 142 and 143:
Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 144 and 145:
Study Disease and number of patient
- Page 146 and 147:
4. Gallay A, Vaillant V, Bouvet P,
- Page 148 and 149:
Table 10.3 Comparison of the variou
- Page 150 and 151:
Discussion Estimating infectious di
- Page 152 and 153:
Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 154 and 155:
Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 156:
Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 11 The aim of this thesis i
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 11 overestimation of the nu
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 11 clinicians to the Public
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 11 operation with the chest
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 11 of the proportion of fal
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 11 Question 3: What is the
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 11 11.2 Some findings of th
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 11 • To improve timelines
- Page 176 and 177:
Summary Summary Surveillance is an
- Page 178 and 179:
Summary linkage of notification and
- Page 180 and 181:
Samenvatting Samenvatting Surveilla
- Page 182 and 183:
Samenvatting subgroepen binnen de b
- Page 184 and 185:
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements W
- Page 186 and 187:
Curriculum vitae Rob van Hest was b
- Page 188 and 189:
Publications This thesis Van Hest N