References Estimat<strong>in</strong>g targeted mobile tuberculosis screen<strong>in</strong>g coverage 1. Fujiwara PI, Frieden TR. Tuberculosis epidemiology and control <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner city. In: Rom W, Garay S, eds. Tuberculosis. New York: Little, Brown & Co, 1996: pp 99-112. 2. Moore-Gillon JC. Tuberculosis and poverty <strong>in</strong> the developed world. In: Davis PD, ed. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical tuberculosis. London: Chapman and Hall, 1998: pp 383-396. 3. Hayward AC, Darton T, Van-Tam JN, Watson JM, Coker R, Schwoebel V. Epidemiology and control of tuberculosis <strong>in</strong> Western European cities. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003; 7: 751-7. 4. Val<strong>in</strong> N, Antoun F, Chouaid C, Renard M, Dautzenberg B, Lalande V, Avache B, Mor<strong>in</strong> P, Sougakoff W, Thiolet JM, Truffot-Pernot C, Jarlier V, Decludt B. Outbreak of tuberculosis <strong>in</strong> a migrants' shelter, Paris, France, 2002. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 528-33. 5. De Vries G, Van <strong>Hest</strong> R. From contact <strong>in</strong>vestigation to tuberculosis screen<strong>in</strong>g of drug addicts and homeless persons <strong>in</strong> Rotterdam. Eur J Public Health 2006; 16: 133-6 6. Story A, Van <strong>Hest</strong> R, Hayward A. Tuberculosis and social exclusion. BMJ 2006; 333: 57-8. 7. Barnes PF, Yang Z, Preston-Mart<strong>in</strong> S, Pogoda JM, Jones BE, Otaya M, Eisenach KD, Knowles L, Harvey S, Cave MD. Patterns of tuberculosis transmission <strong>in</strong> Central Los Angeles. JAMA 1997; 278: 1159-63. 8. Bock NN, Metzger BS, Tapia JR, Blumberg HM. A tubercul<strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g programme and isoniazid preventive therapy programme <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ner-city population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 295-300. 9. Kumar D, Citron KM, Leese J, Watson JM. Tuberculosis among the homeless at a temporary shelter <strong>in</strong> London: report of a chest x ray screen<strong>in</strong>g programme. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995; 49: 629-33. 10. Southern A, Premaratne N, English M, Balazs J, O'Sulli<strong>van</strong> D. Tuberculosis among homeless people <strong>in</strong> London: an effective model of screen<strong>in</strong>g and treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999; 3: 1001-8. 11. Solsona J, Cayla JA, Nadal J, Bedia M, Mata C, Brau J, Maldonado J, Mila C, Alcaide J, Altet N, Galdos- Tanguis H. Screen<strong>in</strong>g for tuberculosis upon admission to shelters and free-meal services. Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17: 123-8. 12. De Vries G, Van <strong>Hest</strong> NA, Šebek MM. Active tuberculosis screen<strong>in</strong>g with mobile digital X-ray units among drug addicts and homeless people <strong>in</strong> Rotterdam. In: Abstracts of the 3rd Congress of European Region International Union aga<strong>in</strong>st Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Moscow, Russia; 2004 June 22-26; Abstract 15. Moscow, Russia: Russian Respiratory Society, 2004. 13. De Vries G, Van <strong>Hest</strong> R, Richardus JH. Impact of mobile radiographic screen<strong>in</strong>g on tuberculosis among drug users and homeless persons. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; Published on-l<strong>in</strong>e 5 April 2007: doi:10.1164/ rccm.200612-1877OC 14. Smit F, Re<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g D, Reijerse M. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the number of people eligible for health service use. Eval Prog Plan 2002; 25: 101-5. 15. International Work<strong>in</strong>g Group for Disease Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Forecast<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> and multiplerecord estimation I: History and theoretical development. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 1047-58. 16. International Work<strong>in</strong>g Group for Disease Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Forecast<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> and multiplerecord estimation II: Applications <strong>in</strong> human diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 1059-68. 17. Hook EB, Regal RR. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> methods <strong>in</strong> epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev 1995; 17: 243-63. 18. Hay G, McKeganey N. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the prevalence of drug misuse <strong>in</strong> Dundee, Scotland: an application of capture-<strong>recapture</strong> methods. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 469-72. 19. Buster MC, Van Brussel GH, Van den Br<strong>in</strong>k W. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the number of opiate users <strong>in</strong> Amsterdam by capture-<strong>recapture</strong>: the importance of case def<strong>in</strong>ition. Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17: 935-42. 20. Fisher N, Turner SE, Pugh R, Taylor C. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g numbers of homeless and homeless mentally ill people <strong>in</strong> north east Westm<strong>in</strong>ster by us<strong>in</strong>g capture-<strong>recapture</strong> analysis. BMJ 1994; 308: 27-30. 21. Gurgel RQ, Da Fonseca JD, Neyra-Castaneda D, Gill GV, Cuevas LE. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> to estimate the number of street children <strong>in</strong> a city <strong>in</strong> Brazil. Arch Dis Child 2004; 89: 222-4. 22. Wilson RM, Coll<strong>in</strong>s MF. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> estimation with samples of size one us<strong>in</strong>g frequency data. Biometrika 1992; 79: 543-53. 23. Van <strong>Hest</strong> NA, Grant AD, Smit F, Story A, Richardus JH.. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fectious disease <strong>in</strong>cidence: validity of capture-<strong>recapture</strong> analysis and truncated models for <strong>in</strong>complete count data. Epidemiol Infect 2007; Published on-l<strong>in</strong>e: 11 March 2007; doi:10.1017/S0950268807008254. 24. Rossmo DK, Routledge R. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the size of crim<strong>in</strong>al populations. J Quant Crim<strong>in</strong>ol 1990; 6: 293-314. 25. Van der Heijden PG, Cruyff MJ, Van Houwel<strong>in</strong>gen, H. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the size of a crim<strong>in</strong>al population from police registrations us<strong>in</strong>g the truncated Poisson regression model. Stat Modell<strong>in</strong>g 2003; 3: 305-22. 26. Van der Heijden PG, Bustami R, Cruyff MJ, Engbersen G, Van Houwel<strong>in</strong>gen HC Po<strong>in</strong>t and <strong>in</strong>terval estimation of the truncated Poisson regression model. Stat Modell<strong>in</strong>g 2003; 3: 305-22. 27. Hser YI. Population estimation of illicit drug users <strong>in</strong> Los Angeles County. J Drug Issues 1993; 23: 323-34. 135
Chapter 9 28. Smit F, Toet J, Van der Heijden PJ. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the number of opiate users <strong>in</strong> Rotterdam us<strong>in</strong>g statistical models for <strong>in</strong>complete count data. In: Hay G, McKeganey N, Birks E, eds. F<strong>in</strong>al report EMCDDA project Methodological Pilot Study of Local Level Prevalence Estimates. Lisbon: EMCDDA, 1997: pp 47-66. 29. Bohn<strong>in</strong>g D, Suppawattanabodee B, Kusolvitkul, W, Viwatwongkasem C. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the number of drug users <strong>in</strong> Bangkok 2001: a capture-<strong>recapture</strong> approach us<strong>in</strong>g repeated entries <strong>in</strong> one list. Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 1075-83. 30. Hay G, Smit F. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the number of hard drug users from needle-exchange data. Addiction Res Theory 2003; 11: 235-43. 31. Chao A. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the population size for capture-<strong>recapture</strong> data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 1987; 43: 783-91. 32. Zelterman D. <strong>Rob</strong>ust estimation <strong>in</strong> truncated discrete distributions with application to capture-<strong>recapture</strong> experiments. J Statistic Plan Inf 1988; 18: 225-37. 33. Chao A. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g animal abundance with capture frequency data. J Wildl Manage 1988; 52: 295-300. 34. Chao A. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g population size for sparse data <strong>in</strong> capture-<strong>recapture</strong> experiments. Biometrics 1989; 45: 427-38. 35. Hook EB, Regal RR. Validity of Bernouilli census, log-l<strong>in</strong>ear and truncated b<strong>in</strong>omial models for correct<strong>in</strong>g for underestimates <strong>in</strong> prevalence studies. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 168-76. 36. Chao A, Tsay PK, L<strong>in</strong> S-H, Shau W-Y, Chao D-Y. The applications of capture-<strong>recapture</strong> models to epidemiological data. Statist Med 2001; 20: 3123-57. 37. Hook EB, Regal RR. <strong>Capture</strong>-<strong>recapture</strong> methods. Lancet 1992; 339: 742. 38. Hook EB, Regal RR. The value of capture-<strong>recapture</strong> methods even for apparent exhaustive surveys. The need for adjustment for source of ascerta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>in</strong>tersection <strong>in</strong> attempted complete prevalence studies. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 1060-7. 39. Biesma S, Snippe J, Bieleman B. [Illicit drug users registered. Characteristics, population size and mobility of problematic illicit drug users <strong>in</strong> Rotterdam]. Gron<strong>in</strong>gen: Intraval, 2004. 136
- Page 1 and 2:
Capture-recapture Methods in Survei
- Page 3 and 4:
Colofon Capture-recapture methods i
- Page 5 and 6:
Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof.dr
- Page 8:
Contents Page 1 Introduction 9 2 Me
- Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 1.1 Assessing completenes
- Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 94% among AIDS patients w
- Page 15 and 16:
Table 1.1 Objectives, methods, data
- Page 17 and 18:
Researchers Objective Method Data-s
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 source capture-recapture
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 32. Bradley BL, Kerr KM,
- Page 24 and 25:
2 Methodology of capture-recapture
- Page 26 and 27:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 28 and 29:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 30 and 31:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 32 and 33:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 34 and 35:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 36:
Methodology of capture-recapture an
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 3.1 Application of captur
- Page 41 and 42:
Table 3.1 Published capture-recaptu
- Page 43 and 44:
Disease Authors Objective Method Da
- Page 45 and 46:
Disease Authors Objective Method Da
- Page 47 and 48:
Disease Authors Objective Method Da
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 3 3.3 References 1. Hook EB
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 3 52. Reintjes R, Termorshu
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 4 Abstract The aim of this
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 4 Methods Nearly all Dutch
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 4 Table 4.2 The number of m
- Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 4 diagnosis. Other patients
- Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 4 stratify the population i
- Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 4 25. Lambeth, Southwark an
- Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 5 Abstract To estimate inci
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 5 patients. Capture-recaptu
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 5 Figure 5.1 Four regions o
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 5 Hospital records From 385
- Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 5 Table 5.1 Epidemiological
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 5.2 Number and proportion of
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 5 cautious about the associ
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 5 Incidence of community-ac
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 6 Abstract The aim of this
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 6 3. Hospitalised patients
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 6 Record-linkage of all 537
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 6 Figure 6.1 Schematic view
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 6 Table 6.2 Total and strat
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 6 administrative discrepanc
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 6 the patients, and complet
- Page 96 and 97: 7 Undetected burden of tuberculosis
- Page 98 and 99: Introduction Underreporting of tube
- Page 100 and 101: Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
- Page 102 and 103: Table 7.1 Total and subset numbers
- Page 104 and 105: Table 7.2 Capture-recapture estimat
- Page 106 and 107: Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
- Page 108: Underreporting of tuberculosis in t
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 8 Abstract In 1999 the Enha
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 8 bacteriological confirmat
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 8 Results Table 8.1 shows t
- Page 117 and 118: Table 8.3 Annual and overall observ
- Page 119 and 120: Table 8.4 Annual and overall estima
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 8 interaction however, i.e.
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 8 shows that observed under
- Page 126 and 127: 9 Estimating the coverage of tuberc
- Page 128 and 129: Introduction Estimating targeted mo
- Page 130 and 131: Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
- Page 132 and 133: Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
- Page 134 and 135: Estimating targeted mobile tubercul
- Page 138 and 139: 10 Estimating infectious diseases i
- Page 140 and 141: Introduction Estimating infectious
- Page 142 and 143: Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 144 and 145: Study Disease and number of patient
- Page 146 and 147: 4. Gallay A, Vaillant V, Bouvet P,
- Page 148 and 149: Table 10.3 Comparison of the variou
- Page 150 and 151: Discussion Estimating infectious di
- Page 152 and 153: Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 154 and 155: Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 156: Estimating infectious disease incid
- Page 159 and 160: Chapter 11 The aim of this thesis i
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 11 overestimation of the nu
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 11 clinicians to the Public
- Page 165 and 166: Chapter 11 operation with the chest
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 11 of the proportion of fal
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 11 Question 3: What is the
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 11 11.2 Some findings of th
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 11 • To improve timelines
- Page 176 and 177: Summary Summary Surveillance is an
- Page 178 and 179: Summary linkage of notification and
- Page 180 and 181: Samenvatting Samenvatting Surveilla
- Page 182 and 183: Samenvatting subgroepen binnen de b
- Page 184 and 185: Acknowledgements Acknowledgements W
- Page 186 and 187:
Curriculum vitae Rob van Hest was b
- Page 188 and 189:
Publications This thesis Van Hest N