ARGENTINA - Unido

(iv)
A logically valid means-end relationship has been established between the project
objective(s) and outcomes and the higher-level programme-wide or country level
objectives.
Funds mobilization
The extent to which:
(i) The national management and counterparts were able and willing, to contribute
(in kind and/or cash) to project implementation and in taking an active part in
funds mobilization.
(ii) UNIDO HQs and the Field representation paid adequate attention to and was
effective in funds mobilization.
Ownership and relevance
The extent to which:
(i) The project was formulated with participation of the national counterpart and/or
target beneficiaries.
(ii) The counterpart(s) has (have) been appropriately involved and were
participating in the identification of their critical problem areas and in the
development of technical cooperation strategies and are actively supporting the
implementation of the project approach.
(iii) The outputs as formulated in the project document are still necessary and
sufficient to achieve the expected outcomes objectives.
Efficiency of implementation
The extent to which:
(i)
(ii)
UNIDO and Government/counterpart inputs have been provided as planned and
were adequate to meet requirements.
The quality of UNIDO services (expertise, training, equipment, methodologies,
etc.) was as planned and led to the production of outputs.
Effectiveness
Assessment of:
(i) The relevance of the outputs produced and how the target beneficiaries use the
outputs.
(ii) The outcomes, which have been or are likely to be realized through utilization of
outputs.
Impact and sustainability
(i)
Identify what long term developmental changes (economic, environmental,
social) have occurred or are likely to occur as a result of the intervention and how
far they are sustainable.
Project coordination and management
The extent to which:
(i) The national management and overall field coordination mechanisms of the
project have been efficient and effective.
72