ARGENTINA - Unido

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Quality Assessment of the Evaluation Report: All UNIDO evaluations are subject to quality assessments by UNIDO Evaluation Group. These apply evaluation quality assessment criteria and are used as a tool for providing structured feedback. The quality of the evaluation report will be assessed and rated against the criteria set forth in the Checklist on evaluation report quality (annex 2). Annex 1.1 Template of in-depth evaluation reports I. Executive summary Must be self-explanatory Not more than five pages focusing on the most important findings and recommendations Overview matrix showing strengths and weaknesses of the project II. Introduction Information on the evaluation: why, when, by whom, etc. Information sources and availability of information Methodological remarks and validity of the findings III. Project summary Fact sheet (project structure, objectives, donors, counterparts, timing, cost, etc) Brief description including history and previous cooperation Situation of the country; major changes in framework conditions IV. Project identification and formulation Identification Formulation Funds mobilization V. Project Implementation Relevance Ownership Reaching target groups Sustainability Management Outputs Outcome, impact VI. VII. VIII. Overview table showing performance by outcomes/outputs Issues with regard to a possible next phase Assessment of proposals put forth in view of the results achieved in Phase I Recommendations on how to proceed in Phase II, overall focus, outputs, activities, budgets, etc. Conclusions and Recommendations Recommendations must always be based on findings and conclusions Lessons learned Lessons learned must always be based on findings and conclusions and must be of wider applicability beyond the evaluated project. 74
Annex 1.2 Report quality criteria UNIDO Evaluation Group Assessment notes Rating A. Did the report present an assessment of relevant outcomes and achievement of project objectives? B. Were the report consistent and the evidence complete and convincing? C. Did the report present a sound assessment of sustainability of outcomes or did it explain why this is not (yet) possible? D. Did the evidence presented support the lessons and recommendations? E. Did the report include the actual project costs (total and per activity)? F. Quality of the lessons: Were lessons readily applicable in other contexts? Did they suggest prescriptive action? G. Quality of the recommendations: Did recommendations specify the actions necessary to correct existing conditions or improve operations (‘who?’ ‘what?’ ‘where?’ ‘when?)’. Can they be implemented? H. Was the report well written? (Clear language and correct grammar) I. Were all evaluation aspects specified in the TOR adequately addressed? J. Was the report delivered in a timely manner? Checklist on evaluation report quality Rating system for quality of evaluation reports A number rating 1-6 is used for each criterion: Highly Satisfactory = 6, Satisfactory = 5, Moderately Satisfactory = 4, Moderately Unsatisfactory = 3, Unsatisfactory = 2, Highly Unsatisfactory = 1, and unable to assess = 0. 75
Page 1:
Evaluación Independiente ARGENTINA
Page 4 and 5:
Dist. GENERAL OSL/EVA/R.9 29 Novemb
Page 6 and 7:
4.4 Proyectos transversales 43 4.4.
Page 8 and 9:
Abreviaturas APEA ACC ACDI AEBA AVS
Page 10 and 11:
Glosario de Términos de Evaluació
Page 13 and 14:
Resumen ejecutivo El Programa “Re
Page 15 and 16:
) Componente 2 y 3 “Promoción de
Page 17 and 18:
directos para el grupo meta (PYME).
Page 19 and 20:
g) Para programas en países con in
Page 21 and 22:
Executive Summary The Programme:
Page 23 and 24:
) Component 2 and 3 “Investment p
Page 25 and 26:
not used (especially the guarantee
Page 27:
have to be defined beforehand and t
Page 30 and 31:
1.3 Metodología seguida La evaluac
Page 32 and 33:
La Tabla 1 describe la situación f
Page 34 and 35:
externas del gobierno nacional y la
Page 36 and 37:
llamativo retroceso en este índice
Page 38 and 39:
disimilitud apuntada, vale realizar
Page 40 and 41:
d) La Agencia Córdoba Ciencia (ACC
Page 42 and 43:
Identificación de 100 oportunidade
Page 45 and 46:
4 Evaluación de los componentes y
Page 47 and 48:
La participacion de los consultores
Page 49 and 50:
depende principalmente del nivel de
Page 51 and 52: 18°C necesita mucha energía. Es n
Page 53 and 54: • CTU está capacitada y equipada
Page 55 and 56: BLs Actividades 2002-2003 11-50 Tab
Page 57 and 58: La adquisición y la instalación d
Page 59 and 60: El objetivo de exportación es cues
Page 61 and 62: Definición de bienestar en animale
Page 63 and 64: Apropiación local FABA ha particip
Page 65 and 66: Tabla nº 10 MAQUINARIA AGRICOLA -
Page 67 and 68: Con referencia al grupo meta de est
Page 69 and 70: Los viajes de estudio y participaci
Page 71 and 72: Tabla nº 6 Componente Fondo de Gar
Page 73 and 74: Implementación y Gestión El geren
Page 75 and 76: conocimientos específicos y costos
Page 77 and 78: Objetivos y pertinencia El sub-proy
Page 79: Cuadro 1: Resumen del desempeño de
Page 82 and 83: las contrapartes locales o por la c
Page 84 and 85: Cuadro 3 - Lógica interna del prog
Page 86 and 87: sectores porcino y avícola) y la u
Page 89 and 90: 6 Recomendaciones 6.1 Recomendacion
Page 91 and 92: departamentos técnicos especializa
Page 93 and 94: consorcios de exportación con efec
Page 95 and 96: 7 Enseñanzas aprendidas • La pro
Page 97 and 98: ANEXO I Términos de referencia de
Page 99 and 100: Project No. Total Allotment Total E
Page 101: (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) The UNIDO HQ ba
Page 105 and 106: INTI - Instituto Nacional de la Tec
Page 107 and 108: 3.Evolución del mercado laboral Oc
Page 109 and 110: 8. Evolución del total de depósit
show all

ARGENTINA - Unido

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?