29.06.2013 Views

Télécharger la revue en format "pdf". - UQAM

Télécharger la revue en format "pdf". - UQAM

Télécharger la revue en format "pdf". - UQAM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Drg Use<br />

Sexual Panner Choice in Injecting Drug Users<br />

Most respond<strong>en</strong>ts were curr<strong>en</strong>tly injecting with the majority having<br />

injected within hours (17.2% of males, 20.3% of females) or days<br />

(33.9% of males, 30.9% of females) of the interview: only 6.7% of<br />

males and 2.7% of females had not injected within the year. Mean age<br />

of first injection of a drug was 18.6 ± 4.4 years for males, 18.1 ± 3.8 for<br />

females, and mean age of injecting a drug once a month or more was<br />

20.0 ± 4.6 (19.0 ± 4.4) years. Average frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of injecting (or for those<br />

not curr<strong>en</strong>tly injecting, wh<strong>en</strong> they were <strong>la</strong>st injecting) per typical<br />

month was 49 ± 66 times for males, 53 ± 66 times for females. The<br />

drugs most commonly injected in the <strong>la</strong>st typical using month (more<br />

than one could be nominated) were heroin (67.1% of males, 70.1% of<br />

females), amphetamines (34.6% of males, 32.2% of females) and<br />

cocaine (13.2% of the male and 15.1% of the female sample).<br />

Sexual Parners<br />

For male respond<strong>en</strong>ts, partner numbers for the past year were,<br />

female partners mean 6.1 ± 11.1,median 3.0 (n : 846,0: 6.6%, missing<br />

data: 6.8%), male partners mean 5.4 ± 18.0, median 0.0 (n : 421,<br />

0: 64.4%, missing data: 53.6%). For female respond<strong>en</strong>ts, male<br />

partners for the past year were mean 13.5 ± 28.3,median 2 (n : 313,<br />

0: 3.5%, missing data: 5.4%),and female partners for the past year<br />

were mean 1.9 ± 6.1, median 0, (n: 200, 0: 58.5%, missing<br />

data: 39.6%). Perc<strong>en</strong>tages giv<strong>en</strong> here and in the tables are based on<br />

excluded missing data and thus wh<strong>en</strong> missing data perc<strong>en</strong>tages are<br />

ad de d, will sum to >100%. For self-id<strong>en</strong>tified sexual ori<strong>en</strong>tation, group<br />

sizes for males were homosexual 50,bisexual 117, heterosexual 719,<br />

and for females, lesbian 10, bisexual 95, and heterosexual 220.<br />

Differ<strong>en</strong>ces for sexual ori<strong>en</strong>tation have be<strong>en</strong> described elsewhere<br />

(Ross, Wodak, Gold & Miller, 1992),as has sexual behaviour of the<br />

sample (Ross, Wodak & Gold, 1992).<br />

The results of the nature of the <strong>la</strong>st sexual contact are described in<br />

Table 1. It is appar<strong>en</strong>t that for male respond<strong>en</strong>ts, the proportional<br />

perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the <strong>la</strong>st sexual contact was heterosexual female nonprostitute<br />

for nearly three-quarters (74.1%). Nearly one-third (31.5%)<br />

were wom<strong>en</strong> who did not inject drugs, 11.2% were female prostitutes,<br />

and a further 13.3% of <strong>la</strong>st contacts were with male partners. For<br />

female respond<strong>en</strong>ts, the proportional perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the <strong>la</strong>st sexual<br />

contact followed a simi<strong>la</strong>r distribution, with a greater proportion<br />

(85.3%) of <strong>la</strong>st sexual partners being heterosexual non-prostitute m<strong>en</strong>.<br />

However, a greater proportion of partners of wom<strong>en</strong> were IDUs<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!