31.05.2013 Views

Numero 1 2007 - IIS

Numero 1 2007 - IIS

Numero 1 2007 - IIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E. Seib e M. Koçak - Fracture analysis of strength undermatched welds of thin-walled aluminium structures using FITNET procedure<br />

LBW and FSW of aerospace grade Alalloy<br />

6013 in thin-walled condition has<br />

been demonstrated. It has been shown<br />

that special care should be exercised in<br />

selecting the material input parameters<br />

and the assumption on the stress state of<br />

the panels.<br />

6. Conclusions<br />

The application of the mismatch option<br />

of the Fracture Module of the FITNET<br />

FFS Procedure to LBW and FSW panels<br />

has yielded conservative estimations of<br />

the maximum load carrying capacity.<br />

This analysis option allows for the<br />

account of weld specific features like the<br />

local tensile properties of the weld material<br />

as well as the weld geometry by<br />

including the weld width, 2H, in the<br />

yield load solution of the strength<br />

mismatched configuration.<br />

The verification of the FITNET FFS<br />

Procedure for highly strength undermatched<br />

Al-alloy welds in thin-walled<br />

structures under tension yielded the<br />

following results:<br />

• The variation of selected input<br />

parameters has shown that the<br />

residual strength predictions are less<br />

sensitive to the weld width, 2H, and<br />

the weld metal strain hardening exponent,<br />

N W.<br />

• The variation of the weld metal yield<br />

strength, σ YW, however, has significantly<br />

affected the residual strength<br />

predictions of the welded panels. It is<br />

therefore recommended to determine<br />

and use local tensile properties of the<br />

weld material with micro-flat tensile<br />

specimens.<br />

• This technique provides intrinsic<br />

(local) stress-strain curves of the<br />

material region of interest. Global<br />

tensile properties of the weld joints,<br />

as they are obtained from standard<br />

transverse flat tensile specimens, may<br />

over-estimate the weld metal yield<br />

strength, which in turn may lead to<br />

non-conservative residual strength<br />

predictions of structural components<br />

containing cracks in such strength<br />

undermatched welds.<br />

• The variation of the constraint parameter<br />

m has shown that the value of<br />

m = 2.0 is suitable for highly undermatched<br />

LBW and FSW panels to<br />

predict the maximum load and<br />

References<br />

[1] Rendings K.H.: «Aluminium structures used in aerospace - Status and<br />

Prospects», Materials Science Forum, 1997, 242, pp. 11-24.<br />

[2] Irving B.: «Why aren’t airplanes welded», Welding Journal, 1997, 76, (1),<br />

pp. 31-42.<br />

[3] FITNET, European Fitness-for-Service (FFS) Network. GIRT-CT-2001-<br />

05071, http://www.eurofitnet.org.<br />

[4] ARAMIS: «Optical deformation analysis», http://www.gom.com.<br />

[5] Miller A.G.: «Review of limit loads of structures containing defects», International<br />

Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1988, 32, pp. 197-327.<br />

[6] Schwalbe K.H., Kim Y.J., Hao S., Cornec A., Koçak M.: «EFAM ETM-MM<br />

96: The ETM method for assessing the significance of crack-like defects in<br />

joints with mechanical heterogeneity (strength mismatch)», GKSS Report<br />

97/E/9, GKSS Forschungszentrum, 1997.<br />

[7] Koçak M.: «Fitness for service analysis of structures using FITNET procedure:<br />

an overview». In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on<br />

Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE)», Halkidiki, Greece,<br />

12-17 June, 2005.<br />

[8] SINTAP: Structural INTegrity Assessment Procedure, final revision.<br />

EU-Project BE 95-1462 Brite Euram Programme, 1999.<br />

[9] Seib E.: «Residual strength analysis of laser beam and friction stir welded<br />

aluminium panels for aerospace applications», PhD thesis (2005), TU<br />

Hamburg-Hamburg. To be published.<br />

➠ segue<br />

Sommario<br />

Analisi della frattura di saldature di componenti sottili in alluminio<br />

significativamente undermatched utilizzando la procedura FITNET<br />

L’articolo presenta una metodologia per la predizione della resistenza residua<br />

in componenti sottili soggetti a carichi con saldature significativamente undermatched<br />

contenenti difetti bidimensionali.<br />

L’analisi è basata sulla Mismatch Option (in termini di resistenza meccanica)<br />

del Modulo Fracture, inserito nella recente procedura FITNET per il Fitness<br />

for Service (FFS) . La Mismatch Option permette di considerare, nell’analisi di<br />

meccanica della frattura di componenti saldati contenenti difetti, caratteristiche<br />

della saldatura, come la resistenza meccanica e la configurazione<br />

geometrica.<br />

La metodologia descritta è stata verificata con i dati sperimentali risultanti da<br />

questo studio.<br />

Il materiale utilizzato è la lega di alluminio 6013 T6 indurita mediante invecchiamento<br />

ultilizzata recentemente in componenti di strutture areonautiche.<br />

Le saldature, testa a testa, sono state eseguite mediante saldatura laser CO 2 e<br />

FSW.<br />

Sono stati analizzati il comportamento della deformazione e della frattura così<br />

come ulteriori particolari caratteristiche secondo i criteri della procedura FFS<br />

FITNET.<br />

I risultati hanno mostrato che usando la metodologia presentata, seguendo le<br />

recenti raccomandazioni proposte per la selezione dei dati d’ingresso, può<br />

essere ottenuta una previsione conservativa della massima capacità di sopportare<br />

il carico di grandi panelli saldati sottoposti a carico di trazione contenenti<br />

lunghe cricche nella saldatura.<br />

Riv. Ital. Saldatura - n. 1 - Gennaio / Febbraio <strong>2007</strong><br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!