o_19po8js951tvs1r0t1r8s4bb1vpla.pdf

Recommendations

Info

Future, well-being, interdependence: key-words for contemporaneous design satisfaction of a few people, and for a short period of time, is not sustainable in a system in which the economical globalization and the internationalization of the cultures offers us, every moment, day after day, the scientific and real demonstration of the deep and indispensable close relation between all the factors of the biosphere and of the technosphere through the sociosphere (MALDONADO, 1970). The challenge of the contemporaneous designer is connected, in our opinion, to how to materialize objects and services inside of this paradigm that links our projectual action in relation to the FUTURE, WELL-BEING, INTERDEPENDENCE. We think that the knot of the problem is related to the nature of the projects elaboration processes that, with the technique, must transform themselves into culture, or better, into cultures. The paradigm FUTURE-WELL-BEING-INTERCONNECTION does not represent, in its individually defined pillars, a new to which dedicating, only now, a particular attention as designers. Since always the designer acts in the future, that is the only dimension given to us to act (JOUVENEL, 1967). What is curious is that only in the four last decades, the sociology opened a field of studies intentionally acceptable about the future (future studies) and that the attention of the designers for this humanistic knowledge had been deviated for so long. Actually, we may certainly affirm that the word FUTURE is not present in the design scientific debate and in the design up to now, if we make an exception to the response-book that Tomás Maldonado wrote in 1987, “The future of modernity”, to go against the hypothesis and paradigms that the philosopher Gianni Vattimo (2011), Italian theoretician of the fragile thought, introduced in his “The end of modernity”. But Maldonado does not enter in the debate of the Future Studies, he, instead, stays firmly connected to the concept of future like the epistemology of modernity made use of it, in sense, in an optimistic and progressive way. In March of 2013, in the Polytechnic of Milan, happened the first seminar about Anticipation 3 , which had as its main and declared objective the attempt of understanding the Future Studies as instrumentation for the design use. The future is the only possible dimension for design, but it has passed almost half-century since 3 “Anticipation”: seminar about Design and Humanism, research FARB, Department INDACO 2012, Resp. Cient. Salvatore Zingale, with trusteeship of F. Celaschi and guests Roberto Poli and Simone Arnaldi. Cadernos de Estudos Avançados em Design - design e humanismo - 2013 - p. 105-130 115
Flaviano Celaschi, Dijon De Moraes the moment that the design explicitly perceived the Future Studies to try to explore the huge potential of methodologies and humanist-scientific knowledge around it. The WELL-BEING is an aspect that is in the center of the attentions of design for a long time, mainly through two concepts: the concept of ergonomics and of the necessity of referring to the human dimension, before physical and each time more perceptive, the projectual acting; the design for all, that identifies, nowadays, the conjunct of projectual types of knowledge that are made available for the “people with temporary or definitive disability”. A holistic vision of the well-being takes a while to call the designers’ attention, because it is hard for it to become measurable and for determined emotive aspects of the subject to be acceptable by science, the same way it takes long for the issue of the creativity and the individual and personal contribution of the designer to the project to be recognized as soundable. Nowadays, the well-being is something that identifies a psycho-socio-neuro-bioanthropo-cultural conjunct, infinitely more sophisticated, complex and interactive, over which the design exerts influence. The INTERDEPENDENCE is in the base of the systemic vision of the biological processes, consciousness that, in the studies of the natural, is very old, but that starts very late to be part of the critical consciousness of the operators of the artificial. The limitation of the traditional resources, the consciousness of the limit to the development, the exigency of making the accountancy with the balance of the vital factors that characterize the artificial impact in the natural, are all aspects that enter in the debate of design from the half of the 1990s on. But it is the consciousness of globalization that allowed us, almost in the year 2000, to have the direct experience about the consequences of the systemic interaction of the factors: on one side, the acceleration of the financial and economical crisis, and, on the other side, the rising of the local ideological, religious, ethnic conflicts, that makes us understand the weakness of each part of the system and the very strong relation of interdependence between them. The design, once more, uses late this consciousness. The School of Turin, among the first ones, maybe for a long time, was the only one to evolve in the direction of the System design. It explores many of the possibilities of the systemic management of the processes and of the systems-product. The greater part of the debates limit 116 Cadernos de Estudos Avançados em Design - design e humanismo - 2013 - p. 105-130
Page 3 and 4:
EdUEMG - Editora da Universidade do
Page 5 and 6:
Cadernos de Estudos Avançados em D
Page 7 and 8:
A Coleção Os Cadernos de Estudos
Page 9 and 10:
The Collection The Collection of Ad
Page 12 and 13:
Apresentação É com grande satisf
Page 14 and 15:
de design e de projeto, gerados no
Page 16:
gain more space and support the fut
Page 19 and 20:
Deborah Philips processo que data d
Page 21 and 22:
Deborah Philips que estas apareciam
Page 23 and 24:
Deborah Philips barata e popular ge
Page 25 and 26:
Deborah Philips ideias populares de
Page 27 and 28:
Deborah Philips para as vendas inic
Page 29 and 30:
Deborah Philips circulação mais a
Page 31 and 32:
Deborah Philips de produção e era
Page 33 and 34:
Deborah Philips Referências ALTICK
Page 36 and 37:
Futuro, bem-estar, interdependênci
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Tendências e antitendências no de
Page 64 and 65:
Tendências e antitendências no de
Page 66 and 67: Tendências e antitendências no de
Page 68 and 69: Tendências e antitendências no de
Page 70: Tendências e antitendências no de
Page 73 and 74: Lucy Niemeyer produtivas e de consu
Page 75 and 76: Lucy Niemeyer desenvolvimento de pr
Page 77 and 78: Lucy Niemeyer antropofágico, podem
Page 79 and 80: Lucy Niemeyer Referência HOUAISS,
Page 81 and 82: Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos
Page 90 and 91: Illustrations and innovations - the
Page 106 and 107: Future, well-being, interdependence
Page 132 and 133: Trends and anti-trends in industria
Page 142 and 143: Design and humanism: for a new mode
Page 150 and 151: Reflections about design and humani
Page 158 and 159: 157
Page 160 and 161: 159
show all

o_19po8js951tvs1r0t1r8s4bb1vpla.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?