26.02.2013 Views

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Theories</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>: Is Plurality<br />

a Problem?<br />

Stephen Lerman<br />

Prelude In this chapter I examine empirically the diversity <strong>of</strong> theories in our field,<br />

based <strong>on</strong> a detailed study carried out recently, and I draw <strong>on</strong> the sociological theories<br />

<strong>of</strong> Basil Bernstein to relate the developments to the nature <strong>of</strong> intellectual communities<br />

and their producti<strong>on</strong>s. In particular, I suggest that the multiplicity and divergence<br />

are not surprising nor are they necessarily damaging to the field. I end by discussing<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerns about accountability in relati<strong>on</strong> to research in educati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

Today, in many countries around the world, c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong> the funding <strong>of</strong> Universities<br />

together with demands for accountability are leading to restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

research. In some countries nati<strong>on</strong>al policy is placing c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong> the kinds<br />

<strong>of</strong> research that will be funded (e.g. the effects <strong>of</strong> No Child Left Behind policy in the<br />

USA), in the name <strong>of</strong> accountability. On the other hand we can observe that, at the<br />

same time, research in mathematics educati<strong>on</strong> is proliferating, not just in quantity, as<br />

is borne out by the expansi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the numbers <strong>of</strong> mathematics educati<strong>on</strong> journals and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>ferences but also in the range <strong>of</strong> theories that are drawn up<strong>on</strong> in our research.<br />

In this chapter I want to ask: is this surprising, or unusual, and is it necessarily a<br />

hindrance to the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>al research in mathematics?<br />

In discussing these questi<strong>on</strong>s I would argue that we need a specific language that<br />

enables an analysis <strong>of</strong> intellectual fields and their growth, a language that will not<br />

be provided by mathematics or by psychology. I will draw <strong>on</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the later<br />

work <strong>of</strong> the sociologist <strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>, Basil Bernstein, in particular his 1999 paper<br />

<strong>on</strong> research discourses (reprinted also as Chap. 9 in Bernstein 2000), and the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> a recent research study (e.g. Tsatsar<strong>on</strong>i et al. 2003). Following that, I will make<br />

some remarks about the use <strong>of</strong> theory.<br />

S. Lerman ()<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> South Bank University, L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>, UK<br />

e-mail: lermans@lsbu.ac.uk<br />

B. Sriraman, L. English (eds.), <strong>Theories</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Advances in <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_11, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!