26.02.2013 Views

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Surveying <strong>Theories</strong> and Philosophies<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong><br />

Bharath Sriraman and Lyn English<br />

Preliminary Remarks<br />

Any theory <strong>of</strong> thinking or teaching or learning rests <strong>on</strong> an underlying philosophy <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge. <strong>Mathematics</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> is situated at the nexus <strong>of</strong> two fields <strong>of</strong> inquiry,<br />

namely mathematics and educati<strong>on</strong>. However, numerous other disciplines interact<br />

with these two fields, which compound the complexity <strong>of</strong> developing theories that<br />

define mathematics educati<strong>on</strong> (Sriraman 2009a). We first address the issue <strong>of</strong> clarifying<br />

a philosophy <strong>of</strong> mathematics educati<strong>on</strong> before attempting to answer whether<br />

theories <strong>of</strong> mathematics educati<strong>on</strong> are c<strong>on</strong>structible. In doing so we draw <strong>on</strong> the<br />

foundati<strong>on</strong>al writings <strong>of</strong> Lincoln and Guba (1994), in which they clearly posit that<br />

any discipline within educati<strong>on</strong>, in our case mathematics educati<strong>on</strong>, needs to clarify<br />

for itself the following questi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

(1) What is reality? Or what is the nature <strong>of</strong> the world around us?<br />

This questi<strong>on</strong> is linked to the general <strong>on</strong>tological questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> distinguishing objects<br />

(real versus imagined, c<strong>on</strong>crete versus abstract, existent versus n<strong>on</strong>-existent,<br />

independent versus dependent and so forth) (Sriraman 2009b).<br />

(2) How do we go about knowing the world around us? [the methodological questi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

which presents possibilities to various disciplines to develop methodological<br />

paradigms] and,<br />

(3) How can we be certain in the “truth” <strong>of</strong> what we know? [the epistemological<br />

questi<strong>on</strong>].<br />

Even though the aforementi<strong>on</strong>ed criteria have been labelled by educati<strong>on</strong>al theorists<br />

as the building blocks <strong>of</strong> a paradigm (Ernest 1991; Lincoln and Guba 1994;<br />

Sriraman 2009a), others have argued that these could very well c<strong>on</strong>stitute the foundati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> a philosophy for mathematics educati<strong>on</strong> (Sriraman 2008, 2009a).<br />

B. Sriraman ()<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Mathematical Sciences, The University <strong>of</strong> M<strong>on</strong>tana, Missoula, USA<br />

e-mail: sriramanb@mso.umt.edu<br />

L. English<br />

School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong>, Science, and Technology Educati<strong>on</strong>, Queensland University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Technology, Brisbane, Australia<br />

e-mail: l.english@qut.edu.au<br />

B. Sriraman, L. English (eds.), <strong>Theories</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Advances in <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_2, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!