26.02.2013 Views

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appreciating Scientificity in Qualitative<br />

Research<br />

Stephen J. Hegedus<br />

I wish to situate this essay in an educati<strong>on</strong>al paradigm that is c<strong>on</strong>cerned with the educati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> itself, its peers and its students. From here, we acknowledge the necessity<br />

for knowledge and that in learning we discover knowledge either through ourselves,<br />

through our peers or through synthesizing a dialectic between the governing bodies<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge and an educati<strong>on</strong>al system. We might understand that we discover<br />

knowledge in an educati<strong>on</strong>al setting by processes that are akin to scientific discovery.<br />

I propose that we establish knowledge in this very way and in reflecting <strong>on</strong> our<br />

c<strong>on</strong>structing-knowledge enterprise, we endeavor to adhere to a meta-c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>ist<br />

phenomenology, which draws up<strong>on</strong> the learning theory <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>ism (Papert<br />

and Harel 1991) whereby we establish a c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> built <strong>on</strong> a faithful establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> and assess the mechanics <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>structed phenomen<strong>on</strong> through<br />

reflexivity and interactivity with the field.<br />

The Process <strong>of</strong> Scientific Discovery<br />

In some realm, there exists an establishment <strong>of</strong> knowledge, which is deemed necessary<br />

to distribute am<strong>on</strong>gst students. Pedagogues agree to understand the necessity<br />

to distribute certain knowledge, and in doing so acknowledge an underlying indifference<br />

in the student’s mind to establish a cognitive appreciati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the knowledge<br />

that is disseminated.<br />

In a program <strong>of</strong> understanding, it is deemed necessary to establish what is evident<br />

in the structures <strong>of</strong> scientific discovery—that being the recogniti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />

deliverance, and re-c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> knowledge—that give way to<br />

questi<strong>on</strong>ing about their very existence and deliverance.<br />

It is this parallel between critically observing and understanding the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

our scientific work in educati<strong>on</strong>al research and the process <strong>of</strong> its originati<strong>on</strong> with<br />

which I begin. As my work focuses <strong>on</strong> theoretical c<strong>on</strong>structs and interpretati<strong>on</strong>s, if<br />

<strong>on</strong>e adheres to the above assumpti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> teaching and learning, <strong>on</strong>e might observe<br />

S.J. Hegedus ()<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, Public Policy and Civic Engagement, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts<br />

Dartmouth, Dartmouth, USA<br />

e-mail: shegedus@umassd.edu<br />

B. Sriraman, L. English (eds.), <strong>Theories</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Advances in <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_36, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010<br />

381

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!