Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education
Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education
Commentary on Theories of Mathematics Education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
378 B. Sriraman et al.<br />
Duval, R. (2002). Pro<strong>of</strong> understanding in mathematics. In Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 2002 Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>ference<br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong>: Understanding Proving and Proving to Understand (pp. 23–44). Taiwan:<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Taiwan Normal University, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong>.<br />
Fawcett, H. P. (1938/1966). The Nature <strong>of</strong> Pro<strong>of</strong>: A Descripti<strong>on</strong> and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Certain Procedures<br />
Used in Senior High School to Develop an Understanding <strong>of</strong> the Nature <strong>of</strong> Pro<strong>of</strong>. New<br />
York, NY: AMS Reprint Company.<br />
Harel, G. (2006a). What is mathematics? A pedagogical answer to a philosophical questi<strong>on</strong>. In<br />
R. B. Gold & R. Sim<strong>on</strong>s (Eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> from the<br />
Perspective <strong>of</strong> Mathematicians. Mathematical Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> America. Pre-print accessed at<br />
http://math.ucsd.edu/~harel/downloadablepapers/Harel%27s%20WhatIs<strong>Mathematics</strong>.pdf.<br />
Harel, G. (2006b). <strong>Mathematics</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> research, its nature, and its purpose: A discussi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Lester’s paper. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 38(1), 58–62.<br />
Harel, G. (2008). DNR perspective <strong>on</strong> mathematics curriculum and instructi<strong>on</strong>, Part I: Focus <strong>on</strong><br />
proving. ZDM-The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <strong>on</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, 40(3), 487–500.<br />
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ pro<strong>of</strong> schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In<br />
A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
III (pp. 234–283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.<br />
Hersh, R. (2006). 18 Unc<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al Essays <strong>on</strong> the Nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong>. New York: Springer.<br />
Lakatos, I. (1976). Pro<strong>of</strong>s and Refutati<strong>on</strong>s: The Logic <strong>of</strong> Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge:<br />
Cambridge University Press.<br />
Lester, F. (2005). On the theoretical, c<strong>on</strong>ceptual, and philosophical foundati<strong>on</strong>s for research in<br />
mathematics educati<strong>on</strong>. ZDM-The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <strong>on</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, 37(6),<br />
457–467.<br />
Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Pro<strong>of</strong> frames <strong>of</strong> preservice elementary teachers. Journal for<br />
Research in <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, 20(1), 41–51.<br />
Mas<strong>on</strong>, J., Burt<strong>on</strong>, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking Mathematically. L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>: Addis<strong>on</strong>-Wesley<br />
Publishing Co.<br />
Mingus, T. T. Y., & Grassl, R. M. (1999). Preservice teacher beliefs about pro<strong>of</strong>s. School Science<br />
and <strong>Mathematics</strong>, 99(8), 438–444.<br />
Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transiti<strong>on</strong> to formal pro<strong>of</strong>. Educati<strong>on</strong>al Studies in <strong>Mathematics</strong>,<br />
27(3), 249–266.<br />
Moreno, L., & Sriraman, B. (2005). Structural stability and dynamic geometry: Some ideas <strong>on</strong><br />
situated pro<strong>of</strong>s. ZDM—The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <strong>on</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, 37(3), 130–139.<br />
Polya, G. (1954). Patterns <strong>of</strong> Plausible Inference. Princet<strong>on</strong>, NJ: Princet<strong>on</strong> University Press.<br />
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacogniti<strong>on</strong>, and<br />
sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook <strong>of</strong> Research <strong>of</strong> Teaching and<br />
Learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.<br />
Törner, G., & Sriraman, B. (2007). A c<strong>on</strong>temporary analysis <strong>of</strong> the six “<strong>Theories</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong><br />
Educati<strong>on</strong>” theses <strong>of</strong> Hans-Georg Steiner. ZDM—The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <strong>on</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong><br />
Educati<strong>on</strong>, 39(1&2), 155–163.<br />
Van Dormolen, J. (1977). Learning to understand what giving a pro<strong>of</strong> really means. Educati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Studies in <strong>Mathematics</strong>, 8, 27–34.<br />
VanSpr<strong>on</strong>sen, H. (2008). Pro<strong>of</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> novice mathematics pro<strong>of</strong> writers. Doctoral Dissertati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
The University <strong>of</strong> M<strong>on</strong>tana. Dissertati<strong>on</strong> Abstracts Internati<strong>on</strong>al, 69, 04A (UMI No.<br />
3307220).<br />
Weber, K. (2003). A procedural route toward understanding the c<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>. Paper presented<br />
at the 27th C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>of</strong> the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Group for the Psychology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
H<strong>on</strong>olulu, USA.<br />
Weber, K. (2004). A framework for describing the processes that undergraduates use to c<strong>on</strong>struct<br />
pro<strong>of</strong>s. In: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 28th C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>of</strong> the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Group for the Psychology<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong> (Vol. 4, pp. 425–432).<br />
Weyl, H. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie. Vorlesungen über allgemeine Relativitätstheorie. Berlin:<br />
Springer Verlag.<br />
Williams, E. (1980). An investigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> senior high school students’ understanding <strong>of</strong> the nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>. Journal for Research in <strong>Mathematics</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, 165–166.