Muslim Saints of South Asia: The eleventh to ... - blog blog blog
Muslim Saints of South Asia: The eleventh to ... - blog blog blog
Muslim Saints of South Asia: The eleventh to ... - blog blog blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE MENDICANT SAINTS<br />
However, with the ascension <strong>of</strong> the Afghan clan <strong>of</strong> Lodi <strong>to</strong> the throne<br />
<strong>of</strong> Delhi in 1451 fortune once again smiled upon qalandars, and they<br />
became welcome guests at the court. This is accounted for by the true<br />
prediction <strong>of</strong> an unknown qalandar who presented himself in<br />
Sikandar Lodi’s camp and fore<strong>to</strong>ld that he would gain vic<strong>to</strong>ry over<br />
the Sultan <strong>of</strong> Jaunpur. Since then many rulers <strong>of</strong> India have been<br />
favourably disposed <strong>to</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> qalandars in their vicinity. 9<br />
Even the ‘settled’ muqīmān Sufis, in spite <strong>of</strong> their strained relations<br />
with qalandars, sided with them when they faced danger from the<br />
authorities. Thus in the beginning <strong>of</strong> the fifteenth century the wellknown<br />
Chishti mystic from Rudauli, Shaikh Ahmad ‘Abdul Haqq<br />
(died 1434), s<strong>to</strong>od up for the reputation <strong>of</strong> qalandars and other<br />
wandering dervishes, whom the Sultan <strong>of</strong> Bengal Ghiyathuddin<br />
A‘zam Shah had decided <strong>to</strong> banish from his capital, Pandua. This<br />
action also had the purpose <strong>of</strong> getting rid <strong>of</strong> an excess <strong>of</strong> ‘religious<br />
migrants’. Since 1398–9, when Timur’s troops had devastated Punjab<br />
and the region <strong>of</strong> Delhi, thousands <strong>of</strong> wandering ascetics and mystics<br />
had moved over <strong>to</strong> Bengal. In order <strong>to</strong> evict ‘God’s own people’,<br />
however, some pretext had <strong>to</strong> be found, and the Shah found it,<br />
accusing qalandars <strong>of</strong> unseemly behaviour and comparing them with<br />
Hindu jogis:<br />
One night the king visited a camp <strong>of</strong> qalandars disguised as<br />
a beggar. <strong>The</strong>y were just about <strong>to</strong> start eating and rudely<br />
ordered him <strong>to</strong> leave. <strong>The</strong>n the king visited the camp <strong>of</strong> yogis.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y were also taking food <strong>to</strong>gether and gave him an equal<br />
share. To his question why had they fed a mere stranger they<br />
replied that this was in accordance with their cus<strong>to</strong>m <strong>of</strong><br />
sharing all food equally, even with dogs. Next morning the<br />
king ordered the <strong>Muslim</strong> mystics <strong>to</strong> leave Pandua. All were<br />
arrested and escorted <strong>to</strong> boats, which <strong>to</strong>ok them <strong>to</strong> exile.<br />
This action led <strong>to</strong> great unrest in the <strong>to</strong>wn. So Shaikh Ahmad<br />
‘Abdu’l-Haqq, accompanied by a dervish (majdhūb) friend<br />
went <strong>to</strong> the palace <strong>to</strong> test the king’s reaction <strong>to</strong> their presence.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y remained unnoticed for quite some time, then left,<br />
returning <strong>to</strong> the house <strong>of</strong> their host. <strong>The</strong> Shaikh declared<br />
that the king did not expel dervishes and qalandars, only<br />
ignorant mystics.<br />
(Rizvi 1986: 270–1)<br />
Although the version set forth by ‘Abdul Quddus Gangohi in his<br />
Anwār al-‘Uyūn is quite improbable because it is doubtful whether<br />
192