09.03.2013 Views

Munich Re Group Annual Report 2006 (PDF, 1.8

Munich Re Group Annual Report 2006 (PDF, 1.8

Munich Re Group Annual Report 2006 (PDF, 1.8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Munich</strong> <strong>Re</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Re</strong>port <strong>2006</strong> Management report_<strong>Re</strong>insurance<br />

Premium<br />

Premium income remained steady in <strong>2006</strong> at €22.2bn<br />

(22.3bn). With the euro rising on average against the most<br />

important foreign currencies for our business, we also<br />

recorded a decline in premium income due to changes in<br />

exchange rates (without these currency translation effects,<br />

our premium income would have been 0.1% higher).<br />

Approximately €16bn or 71.9% of premium was written in<br />

foreign currency, of which 48.9% was in US dollars and<br />

15.3% in pounds sterling. 28.1% of our premium volume<br />

was transacted in euros.<br />

The main reason for the decline in premium income<br />

was the continuation of our strictly risk-adequate underwriting<br />

policy. Where prices or conditions were not commensurate<br />

with the risks, we refrained from renewing<br />

treaties or writing new business.<br />

In addition, as part of our portfolio management, we<br />

converted our reinsurance treaties in certain market segments<br />

and for specific clients to non-proportional covers<br />

Gross premiums by segment<br />

if this allowed us to create higher added value. We are<br />

prepared to accept that the premium volume generated in<br />

these cases is lower than under proportional treaty forms<br />

of cover. Nevertheless, we largely offset the lower volume<br />

with the substantial rate increases we achieved in the last<br />

renewals for property and offshore energy risks with natural<br />

catastrophe exposure in the USA and Latin America<br />

(especially oil platforms).<br />

In life and health reinsurance, the unrelenting demand<br />

worldwide for privately financed provision products<br />

largely made up for premium reductions from individual<br />

high-volume treaties. This kept our premium income<br />

stable, despite our selective underwriting policy and our<br />

stringent profitability requirements. About 34.5% of our<br />

total premium income was attributable to life and health<br />

reinsurance and 65.5% to the property-casualty segment.<br />

All figures in €m <strong>2006</strong> 2005 2004 2003 2002<br />

Life and health 7,665 7,811 7,540 6,876 6,561<br />

Property-casualty 14,551 14,547 14,857 17,919 18,884<br />

Total 22,216 22,358 22,397 24,795 25,445<br />

Life and Health<br />

Life – Slight decline in premium income with stable<br />

operating result<br />

Health – Premiums at previous year’s level with good<br />

growth opportunities<br />

Favourable result of €561m<br />

<strong>Re</strong>sponsible for<br />

Life and health reinsurance worldwide<br />

Life<br />

<strong>2006</strong> 2005 2004 2003 2002<br />

Gross premiums written<br />

Health<br />

€m 6,356 6,491 6,119 5,461 5,277<br />

Gross premiums written €m 1,309 1,320 1,421 1,415 1,284<br />

Combined ratio * % 96.3 93.0 96.5 96.2 102.8<br />

* Excluding health insurance conducted like life insurance;<br />

previous years’ figures adjusted.<br />

At €7.7bn (7.8bn), gross premiums written in life and health<br />

reinsurance were just below the previous year’s level. Currency<br />

translation had a positive impact on our premium<br />

income in <strong>2006</strong>. Adjusted to eliminate effects from changes<br />

in exchange rates, premium declined by 2.8%. The operating<br />

result of €922m (1,105m) and the consolidated result of<br />

€561m (977m) showed a marked decrease, largely owing<br />

to lower income from investments. Expenditure for taxes<br />

on income in the financial year rose to €265m (48m). In the<br />

previous year, tax expenditure had been exceptionally low,<br />

owing to the impact of loss carry-forwards within the<br />

<strong>Group</strong>.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!