09.03.2013 Views

Munich Re Group Annual Report 2006 (PDF, 1.8

Munich Re Group Annual Report 2006 (PDF, 1.8

Munich Re Group Annual Report 2006 (PDF, 1.8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Munich</strong> <strong>Re</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Re</strong>port <strong>2006</strong> Management report_<strong>Re</strong>insurance<br />

In facultative business, pressure on original rates is<br />

reflected in all lines of business. Given our traditionally<br />

high market penetration, opportunities for new shares in<br />

business are limited.<br />

We therefore anticipate that premium income will<br />

inevitably be lower in 2007, a decrease which we will only<br />

be able to partially offset with new growth. We see the<br />

prospect of medium-term business opportunities from<br />

innovative solutions (e.g. capital market securitisation or<br />

transactions resulting from the implementation of Solvency<br />

II).<br />

Austria, which accounts for 9% of overall business, is<br />

the division’s second-largest market. Apart from a one-off<br />

effect, premiums remained generally stable. The major<br />

Austrian primary insurance groups were very active and<br />

successful in central and eastern Europe, and we benefited<br />

from this business as reinsurers. Although heavy winter<br />

snows in 2005/<strong>2006</strong> gave rise to substantial claims costs<br />

for snow-pressure damage, the result of our Austrian<br />

business was satisfactory overall.<br />

Our premium volume in Switzerland reduced to €86m<br />

(96m) because market consolidation continued and primary<br />

insurers raised their retentions.<br />

Owing to the absence of major losses, our result was<br />

clearly positive and well above the previous year’s figure,<br />

which had been burdened by natural catastrophes.<br />

More than 85% of natural hazards business in Switzerland<br />

is handled in insurance pools. Given the very high<br />

Europe 2 and Latin America<br />

Premium growth of 8.5%<br />

Good result achieved<br />

<strong>Re</strong>sponsible for<br />

loss expenditure in 2005, we were able to considerably<br />

increase our prices for catastrophe covers.<br />

In the acceding EU member states, insurance penetration<br />

increased further in <strong>2006</strong>, and we were able to profit<br />

from the markets’ growth. Our business experience in the<br />

individual countries and regions of eastern Europe varied.<br />

Especially in the countries joining the EU, there was an<br />

upward trend in mergers among primary insurers, consequently<br />

reducing reinsurance cessions. By contrast, our<br />

business developed positively in the Russian Federation,<br />

where insurance penetration is steadily increasing, infrastructure<br />

measures are being intensified and industrial<br />

firms are being expanded and overhauled. We again recorded<br />

the highest premium income in the Czech <strong>Re</strong>public,<br />

a total of €43m (34m), followed by Russia with €33m (24m)<br />

and Poland with €19m (22m).<br />

We continue to see good growth opportunities in<br />

eastern Europe, but also growing competition, which we<br />

expect to exert increasing pressure on margins in reinsurance<br />

as well.<br />

In Greece and Turkey, after several years of higher<br />

growth, we recorded a moderate fall in premium to €106m<br />

(131m), with another positive result. Prices in property<br />

business fell in individual cases.<br />

Northern, western and southern Europe; Latin America <strong>2006</strong> 2005 2004 2003 2002<br />

Gross premiums written €m 3,003 2,769 2,873 3,193 2,952<br />

Combined ratio % 97.2 100.1 98.5 96.6 96.4<br />

In the year under review, our premium income was up by<br />

8.5% to €3.0bn. This pleasing growth was partly due to an<br />

appreciable increase in rate levels in those markets that<br />

had been hit by natural catastrophes in the previous year.<br />

Prices in the other markets remained generally stable. In<br />

some segments, we were able to acquire promising new<br />

business. Changes in exchange rates had only a small<br />

effect on our business result. The combined ratio improved<br />

to 97.2%, as our basic business performed positively overall<br />

thanks to our profit-based underwriting approach, and<br />

natural catastrophes affected us to a below-average<br />

extent.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!