09.03.2013 Views

3 The New York Years (1931–1953)

3 The New York Years (1931–1953)

3 The New York Years (1931–1953)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

322 10 Systematics and Classification<br />

Part 1 (60 pages) of the first edition of this textbook includes brief discussions<br />

of “new systematics,” of taxonomic categories and concepts, species and lower<br />

categories, classification and the higher categories. While it is the function of the<br />

species to denote distinction, it is the function of the genus to denote association.<br />

<strong>The</strong> (subjective) genus is a systematic category including one species or a group<br />

of species of presumably common phylogenetic origin, separated by a decided<br />

gap from other similar groups. Part 2 (140 pages), the largest portion of the<br />

book, introduces the reader into various taxonomic procedures (techniques of<br />

collecting, identification and discrimination, quantitative methods of analysis, and<br />

presentation of the results). Part 3 (80 pages) comprises treatments of zoological<br />

nomenclature, its historical and philosophical basis, the principle of priority, the<br />

type method and the names of systematic categories.<br />

<strong>The</strong> text of the second version (1969b) by Mayr alone is thoroughly reworked<br />

and represents virtually a new book. It includes discussions of the species category,<br />

polytypic species taxa, the higher categories, and theories of biological classification,<br />

methods of zoological classification (identification, analysis of variation,<br />

procedures of classifying and taxonomic publications). Part 3 of the book presents<br />

the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Its entire revised edition of<br />

1964 is accompanied by much more detailed interpretations of the Rules than in<br />

the Code itself. Most of the text is updated, incorporating a large part of recent literature.<br />

Problems at the species level are treated with frequent references to Mayr’s<br />

Animal Species and Evolution (1963b). <strong>The</strong> sections on quantitative procedures and<br />

methods of illustration as well as the section on zoological nomenclature are more<br />

condensed than in the first edition. <strong>New</strong> material includes recent developments in<br />

taxonomic theories of classification on which Mayr (1965b,k, 1968j) had published<br />

before: (1) Phenetics or numerical taxonomy is dismissed because important and<br />

unimportant characters are not distinguished and because of the arbitrary levels<br />

of phenetic distance on which phenetic categories and the delimitation of taxa are<br />

based. (2) Cladistics: <strong>The</strong> grouping of taxa is based on the inferred branching pattern<br />

of phylogeny determined through the distribution of derived (apomorphous)<br />

and primitive (plesiomorphous) characters. <strong>The</strong> interpretation of character polarityiscriticalinthisanalysiswhichMayrpraisedasasoundwayofestablishing<br />

the phylogenetic (branching) pattern of groups of related species. He criticized,<br />

however, cladistic classifications based exclusively on branching or splitting events<br />

without taking into consideration different rates of phyletic evolution after splitting<br />

of the daughter species (autapomorphies). This is simply not part of the concept<br />

of cladistic classification and thus ignored. (3) Evolutionary classification: Taxa are<br />

delimited according to common ancestry and subsequent divergence, classification<br />

is based on the dual results of speciation (cladogenesis) and phyletic evolution<br />

(anagenesis) of organisms. It represents a synthesis or compromise of the best of<br />

the two more extremist schools of thought (Fig. 10.1). Established groups should be<br />

monophyletic (following the definition of Simpson, i.e., derived from the nearest<br />

common ancestor); their rank in classification (genus, subfamily, family) is then<br />

assigned on the basis of overall similarity or total information content of weighted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!