09.03.2013 Views

3 The New York Years (1931–1953)

3 The New York Years (1931–1953)

3 The New York Years (1931–1953)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

372 11 History and Philosophy of Biology—Mayr’s Third Synthesis<br />

birth-control appears to be not enough and Mayr recommended a set of incentives<br />

to be built into the tax system, pension system, and welfare system in the hope that<br />

this will lead to zero population growth in the United States (and elsewhere).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Biological Future of Mankind<br />

Ever since his days as a student did Mayr favor positive eugenics, although he<br />

realized that it is difficult to achieve. In view of the growing overpopulation of the<br />

world “the time will come, and perhaps sooner than we think, when parents will<br />

have to take out a license to produce a child” and “positive eugenics is of great<br />

importance for the future of mankind and all roadblocks must be removed that<br />

stand in the way of intensifying research in this area” (in a letter dated April 14,<br />

1971).<br />

In his comments on J. B. S. Haldane’s essay on “Daedalus or Science and the<br />

Future” of 1925 Mayr (1995d) pointed out that eugenics was universally popular<br />

during the early 20th century, from far-right to far-left writers. Enough was<br />

known about inheritance that in theory a genetic improvement of mankind seemed<br />

possible and Haldane speculated about the production of “ectogenic” test-tube babies<br />

(!) causing a scandal. His friend Aldous Huxley was inspired by Haldane’s<br />

scheme of eugenics to elaborate this scenario in his book, Brave <strong>New</strong> World (1932).<br />

In a lecture which Mayr gave at the Jungius Society of Hamburg on the biological<br />

future of man (1974f), he made clear that any truly biological improvement of man<br />

was only possible through eugenics, but left it open whether this was feasible or<br />

not. He emphasized that ethical values are nothing absolute but conditioned by<br />

circumstances.<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re were a lot of students in the audience, and in particular a strong delegation<br />

of the Spartakus Bund, a communist organization. <strong>The</strong>y tried to refute me by<br />

invoking the communist paradise in Russia, but in answering them, pointing out<br />

that I had been in Russia and none of them had, and also refuting in detail every<br />

single other one of their arguments. With much applause from the other audience,<br />

I silenced them so completely that they decided it was better strategy not to answer<br />

me again. It simply would have given me more opportunity to describe the futility<br />

of Soviet communism.”<br />

(<strong>The</strong> “Biology Section” of the Spartakus Bund in Hamburg commented on<br />

Mayr’s lecture in their pamphlet “<strong>The</strong> Red Handlense” (Die rote Lupe), Nr. 6,<br />

October 1973).<br />

Realism and Liberal Education<br />

Most people adopt commonsense realism because it works (Mayr 1997i). <strong>The</strong>y<br />

accept that there is an outside world and that it is more or less as our sense organs<br />

tell us: This is the middle world (mesocosmos) which extends from the atom<br />

to the solar system. <strong>The</strong> microcosmos is the world of the atom and elementary<br />

particles and the macrocosmos is the world outside the solar system. <strong>The</strong> micro-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!