23.03.2013 Views

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Balloch Field Development <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

Section 6 Accidental Spills<br />

6.4.4. CONCLUSIONS OF MODELLING<br />

Uncontrolled blowout scenario 1: Subsea release<br />

The probability of a surface spill crossing into the European countries waters are as follows:<br />

Norwegian (100 %), Danish (50 %), German (1 ‐ 10 %) and Dutch (1 ‐ 10%).<br />

The probabilities of oil reaching the following shorelines are as follows: Shetland (1 ‐ 10 %),<br />

Orkney (1 – 10 %), UK mainland (1 ‐ 10 %) and Norway (30 ‐ 40 %).<br />

Minimum time to beach 20.7 days.<br />

Maximum mass of oil beached 1,986 tonnes.<br />

Maximum emulsion beached 9,930 tonnes.<br />

Sediment concentration average 200 mg/kg.<br />

In an offshore wind the surface slick could cross the UK ‐ Norwegian median line in 3.5 days,<br />

but 6.5 days in an offshore wind.<br />

Uncontrolled blowout scenario 2: Surface release followed by subsea release<br />

The probability of a surface spill crossing into the European countries waters are as follows:<br />

Norwegian (100 %), Danish (60 ‐ 70 %), German (1 ‐ 10 %) and Dutch (1 ‐ 10%).<br />

The probabilities of oil reaching the following shorelines are as follows: Shetland (1 ‐ 10 %),<br />

Orkney (1 ‐ 10 %), UK mainland (1 ‐ 10 %), Norway (100 %) and Denmark (30 ‐ 40 %).<br />

Minimum time to beach 11.8 days.<br />

Maximum mass of oil beached 3,285 tonnes.<br />

Maximum emulsion beached 16,425 tonnes.<br />

Sediment concentration average 30 mg/kg.<br />

In an offshore wind the surface slick could cross the UK‐Norwegian median line in 1.1 days,<br />

but 9 days in an offshore wind.<br />

Summary of blowout scenarios<br />

In the event of a blowout it is likely that oil will cross into Norwegian waters, with a moderate/high<br />

probability of oil entering into Danish waters and a low probability of oil entering into German and<br />

Dutch waters. There is a marginally greater probability of oil entering into Danish waters in the<br />

surface blowout scenario. In both scenarios there is a low probability of oil beaching anywhere in the<br />

UK, although there appears to be a greater probability of oil beaching in Norway and Denmark for the<br />

surface release scenario.<br />

The surface blowout scenario would result in a shorter duration for an oil spill to reach the shore<br />

(11.8 days) compared to the 20.7 days for the subsurface release. The surface blowout is expected to<br />

result in a greater maximum mass of oil beached (3,385 tonnes), in comparison to the subsurface<br />

blowout (1,986 tonnes).<br />

A subsea blowout could cause elevated hydrocarbon levels in the sediments with typical<br />

concentrations of 200 mg/kg; this is far greater than the 30mg/kg that is expected for the surface<br />

blowout. The time taken to cross the UK‐Norway median line is shorter for the surface blowout spill.<br />

Instantaneous Release of the Diesel Inventory from the Drill Rig.<br />

The loss of the diesel inventory does not result in a large or significant impact:<br />

The probability of a surface spill crossing into Norwegian waters is low (1 ‐ 10 %);<br />

Diesel will not reach any European coastline;<br />

The typical sediment would be 2 mg/kg;<br />

In an offshore and onshore wind the surface slick is not expected to cross the UK‐Norwegian<br />

median line.<br />

6 ‐ 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!