Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Balloch Field Development <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />
Section 6 Accidental Spills<br />
6.4.4. CONCLUSIONS OF MODELLING<br />
Uncontrolled blowout scenario 1: Subsea release<br />
The probability of a surface spill crossing into the European countries waters are as follows:<br />
Norwegian (100 %), Danish (50 %), German (1 ‐ 10 %) and Dutch (1 ‐ 10%).<br />
The probabilities of oil reaching the following shorelines are as follows: Shetland (1 ‐ 10 %),<br />
Orkney (1 – 10 %), UK mainland (1 ‐ 10 %) and Norway (30 ‐ 40 %).<br />
Minimum time to beach 20.7 days.<br />
Maximum mass of oil beached 1,986 tonnes.<br />
Maximum emulsion beached 9,930 tonnes.<br />
Sediment concentration average 200 mg/kg.<br />
In an offshore wind the surface slick could cross the UK ‐ Norwegian median line in 3.5 days,<br />
but 6.5 days in an offshore wind.<br />
Uncontrolled blowout scenario 2: Surface release followed by subsea release<br />
The probability of a surface spill crossing into the European countries waters are as follows:<br />
Norwegian (100 %), Danish (60 ‐ 70 %), German (1 ‐ 10 %) and Dutch (1 ‐ 10%).<br />
The probabilities of oil reaching the following shorelines are as follows: Shetland (1 ‐ 10 %),<br />
Orkney (1 ‐ 10 %), UK mainland (1 ‐ 10 %), Norway (100 %) and Denmark (30 ‐ 40 %).<br />
Minimum time to beach 11.8 days.<br />
Maximum mass of oil beached 3,285 tonnes.<br />
Maximum emulsion beached 16,425 tonnes.<br />
Sediment concentration average 30 mg/kg.<br />
In an offshore wind the surface slick could cross the UK‐Norwegian median line in 1.1 days,<br />
but 9 days in an offshore wind.<br />
Summary of blowout scenarios<br />
In the event of a blowout it is likely that oil will cross into Norwegian waters, with a moderate/high<br />
probability of oil entering into Danish waters and a low probability of oil entering into German and<br />
Dutch waters. There is a marginally greater probability of oil entering into Danish waters in the<br />
surface blowout scenario. In both scenarios there is a low probability of oil beaching anywhere in the<br />
UK, although there appears to be a greater probability of oil beaching in Norway and Denmark for the<br />
surface release scenario.<br />
The surface blowout scenario would result in a shorter duration for an oil spill to reach the shore<br />
(11.8 days) compared to the 20.7 days for the subsurface release. The surface blowout is expected to<br />
result in a greater maximum mass of oil beached (3,385 tonnes), in comparison to the subsurface<br />
blowout (1,986 tonnes).<br />
A subsea blowout could cause elevated hydrocarbon levels in the sediments with typical<br />
concentrations of 200 mg/kg; this is far greater than the 30mg/kg that is expected for the surface<br />
blowout. The time taken to cross the UK‐Norway median line is shorter for the surface blowout spill.<br />
Instantaneous Release of the Diesel Inventory from the Drill Rig.<br />
The loss of the diesel inventory does not result in a large or significant impact:<br />
The probability of a surface spill crossing into Norwegian waters is low (1 ‐ 10 %);<br />
Diesel will not reach any European coastline;<br />
The typical sediment would be 2 mg/kg;<br />
In an offshore and onshore wind the surface slick is not expected to cross the UK‐Norwegian<br />
median line.<br />
6 ‐ 23