Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Balloch Field Development <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />
Section 3 Baseline Environment<br />
3.6.5. MARINE MAMMALS<br />
Marine mammals include mustelids (otters), pinnipeds (seals) and cetaceans (whales, dolphins and<br />
porpoises), all of which are vulnerable to the direct effects of oil and gas activities such as noise,<br />
contaminants and oil spills. They are also affected indirectly by any processes that may affect prey<br />
availability.<br />
Mustelids<br />
Only freshwater otters are to be found in European waters, hence routine offshore oil and gas<br />
activities do not directly affect these mammals. However, in cases of extreme oil spills where oil is<br />
washed ashore, the effects could be detrimental to some local populations which occur in estuarine<br />
waters. One such effect is hypothermia, resulting from the otters’ fur being covered in oil and no<br />
longer being able to function as a thermal layer.<br />
Pinnipeds<br />
Seals tend to frequent inshore waters but have been seen from a number of platforms in the North<br />
Sea (Cosgrove, 1996). Both grey seals (Halichoerus grypu) and common seals (Phoca vitulina) have<br />
breeding colonies along the coastline of the UK. Information on the distribution of seals is based<br />
almost entirely on observations at terrestrial haul out sites and although direct observations can be<br />
made at sea, sightings are rare and most observations continue to be made at inshore areas.<br />
Tagging studies on the behaviour and movement of seals at sea have been undertaken. Basic tags<br />
such as flipper tags have revealed that grey seal pups may travel far from their natal sites within their<br />
first few months at sea, being found as far afield as Norway (McConnell et al., 1984). Transmitters<br />
such as VHF (Thompson and Miller 1990; Thompson et al., 1989) and in particular satellite relay tags<br />
(McConnell et al., 1992 and 1999) have revealed that seal movements are on two geographical scales.<br />
Common seals were shown to predominantly spend their time at or near haul out sites, with short<br />
trips to localised offshore areas. They were occasionally found to travel up to 45 km on feeding trips<br />
of up to 6 days, although the duration of most trips was less than 12 hours (Thompson et al., 1990).<br />
Grey seals, on average, spend the majority of their time within a similar range with a trip duration of<br />
less than 3 days, although they occasionally make long‐distance trips of over 100 km (McConnell et<br />
al., 1999). Trips by pups have been reported over large areas, for example from the Isle of May, up<br />
the Norwegian coast and down to the Netherlands (JNCC, 2007). However, the general pattern of<br />
close proximity to haul out sites suggests that these distant trips are uncommon and possibly made by<br />
only a few individuals (Hammond, 2000). Since the area of the development lies approximately 183<br />
km east of the UK coastline, neither grey seals nor common seals are likely to occur in the area.<br />
Cetaceans<br />
Many of the activities associated with the offshore oil and gas industry have the potential to impact<br />
on cetaceans. Factors which could cause disturbance include noise or obstruction. The actual impact<br />
will depend on the scale and type of activity. Activities with the potential to cause disturbance<br />
include drilling, seismic surveys, vessel movements, construction work and decommissioning (JNCC,<br />
2008).<br />
As marine mammals feed on fish and/or plankton, contamination of the water column affecting the<br />
food source could have a negative impact on cetaceans. Direct impacts could occur due to changes in<br />
prey availability or indirectly as a result of bioaccumulation of contaminants. However, as cetaceans<br />
tend to have large feeding grounds, the localised contamination associated with the normal activity of<br />
oil and gas installations is unlikely to have a major impact on individuals.<br />
As with most species, an optimal survey design for monitoring population sizes of cetaceans would<br />
involve surveying the species across its entire distribution at any one time. The impracticality of such<br />
a task, combined with the difficulties of species identification, has made it difficult to confidently<br />
assess cetacean population sizes. The JNCC has compiled an Atlas of Cetacean Distribution in<br />
Northwest European Waters (Reid et al., 2003). This resource provides an indication of types of<br />
3 ‐ 27