Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Balloch Field Development <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />
Section 3 Baseline Environment<br />
Pockmarks identified within the Balloch development area<br />
Pockmarks are usually found in soft, fine‐grained seabed sediments, often post‐glacial sediments of<br />
the Witch Ground Formation or Flags Formation. The Balloch development is on the edge of the<br />
Witch Ground Basin, characterised by high densities of pockmarks of up to 40 per km 2 .<br />
Pockmarks are typically greater than 10 m across and several metres deep. They are thought to be<br />
formed by the escape of gas or water from beneath the sediment and as such they are often<br />
associated with MDACs ‐ mineral formations thought to be created by escaping methane. MDACs<br />
usually occur as a result of either microbial decomposition of organic matter (microbial methane) or<br />
the thermocatalytic destruction of kerogens (thermogenic methane) (Judd, 2001).<br />
Pockmarks alone are not considered to conform to any of the Annex I habitats; however, MDAC<br />
structures within pockmarks are often associated with the potentially important ‘submarine<br />
structures’ listed in Annex I.<br />
Pockmarks have been observed as habitats for unusual and prolific fauna which may be related to the<br />
carbon associated with the MDAC and an increase in sulphide compounds being available to enter the<br />
food chain, or the physical presence of the MDAC as a hard substrate (Figure 3‐6). In addition, as a<br />
result of the seabed depression, currents are likely to be reduced within the pockmark and finer<br />
sediments with higher organic content are likely to accumulate.<br />
Figure 3‐6 Photograph of pockmark (with evidence of bioturbation) (Fugro, 2005).<br />
The lower bottom currents can lead to high levels of larval settlement, thus a higher abundance of<br />
deposit feeding organisms is often observed in comparison to the surrounding area. Bivalve species<br />
such as Thyasira sarsi and Lucinoma borealis are dependent on high sulphide concentrations and are<br />
only found within pockmarks, not the rest of the open North Sea. There is also a tendency for higher<br />
levels of suspended solids to be associated with the water within pockmarks, which may lead to<br />
increased abundance of shrimps and euphausids. Fish also may take advantage of the sheltered<br />
conditions within the pockmark, for example cod (Gadus morhua), torsk (Brosme brosme) and ling<br />
(Molva molva) (Dando, 2001).<br />
The Scanner pockmark is a large seabed depression measuring approximately 600 m by 30 m, with a<br />
depth of approximately 20 m below the surrounding sea floor. The area supports species associated<br />
with rock reef structures. Amongst the species to colonise the carbonate structures are anemones,<br />
squat lobsters and Astromonema southwardorum (a specialist in methane‐rich environments and<br />
unique to this site).<br />
The pockmarks in the Balloch area were initially identified during a seabed site survey in 1990 for the<br />
exploration well 15/20a‐m. They were found to be small and shallow, less than 50 m across and<br />
about 1 m deep (BP, 1990). This is in keeping with the trend for pockmark sizes to be smaller towards<br />
the ends of the Witch Ground Basin (Dando, 2001). The density of pockmarks in the 1990 survey was<br />
found to be 14 per km 2 . Photographs taken of the pockmarks, however, showed no unusual features<br />
or evidence of MDAC (BP, 1990).<br />
3 ‐ 9