23.03.2013 Views

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Option 3 ‐ New Balloch template/flowline tied back to GPIII with new riser<br />

2 ‐ 8<br />

Balloch Field Development <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

Section 2 Proposed Development<br />

Option 3 requires the largest amount of subsea infrastructure to be installed. The Balloch wells would<br />

be tied back to the GPII FPSO but, unlike options 1 and 2, a new manifold would be installed and tied<br />

back to the FPSO via new 5.1 km production and gas lift lines and an umbilical (Figure 2‐7). This<br />

option does not require a cooling skid, as the Balloch fluids are commingled with the Donan and<br />

Lochranza fluids on board the FPSO. Two additional risers would need to be installed on the GPIII<br />

FPSO for the production and gas lift.<br />

Option 3 would require more subsea and FPSO infrastructure and was considered to have the biggest<br />

environmental and economic impact, hence it was screened out from further consideration.<br />

Conclusion of the Option Selection process<br />

Figure 2‐7 Balloch development Option 3.<br />

Option 1 will maximise production through existing facilities, with minimal requirement for new<br />

infrastructure. The developmental footprint of Option 1 is the smallest and requires the least amount<br />

of new infrastructure, thus it has minimal impacts associated with it. Option 1 is therefore considered<br />

to be the best developmental option in terms of both environmental and economic considerations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!