23.03.2013 Views

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

Environmental Statement - Maersk Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Balloch Field Development <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

Section 5 Assessment of Potential Impacts and Controls<br />

Table 5‐3 Summary of emissions associated with the drilling support vessels assuming three production wells.<br />

Vessel type<br />

Fuel use<br />

(te)<br />

Emissions (te)<br />

CO 2 NO x N 2O SO 2 CO CH 4 VOC<br />

3 Anchor Handling Vessels 3,690 11,808 219 0.81 14.76 57.93 0.66 7.38<br />

Supply vessel 2,550 8,160 151.5 0.56 10.2 40.04 0.46 5.1<br />

Standby vessel 166 532 9.9 0.04 0.66 2.61 0.03 0.33<br />

Helicopter 360 1,152 21.4 0.08 1.44 5.65 0.06 0.72<br />

Total from vessels 6,600 21,120 392 1.45 26.40 103.62 1.19 13.20<br />

Emissions to air from well clean‐up and well testing<br />

Well clean‐up is necessary to ensure the well no longer contains any drilling and completion related<br />

debris (mud, brine, cuttings) which could potentially damage the topsides when completion and<br />

production begin. A well test flow period may be required to obtain reservoir properties, flow rate<br />

information and fluid samples dependent on the information obtained during the drilling of the<br />

reservoir section. Emissions of CO2, CH4 and VOCs are higher during clean‐up and well test operations<br />

than during rig and vessel activities associated with drilling and completions.<br />

At the time of writing (August 2012), the volumes of hydrocarbons to be flared during well clean‐up<br />

and testing were not known. A worst case of 2,000 te of oil per well was therefore assumed.<br />

Atmospheric emissions resulting from the well test and clean‐up for the three proposed Balloch<br />

production wells have been calculated using the EEMS emissions factors (EEMS, 2008) and are<br />

presented in Table 5‐4. Total CO2 associated with flaring at the three wells equates to 0.49 % of that<br />

produced by similar activities in 2009 in UKCS waters.<br />

Table 5‐4 Summary of atmospheric emissions from the Balloch well clean‐up and well testing activities.<br />

Hydrocarbons<br />

flared (te)<br />

Emissions (te)<br />

CO 2 NO x N 2O SO 2 CO CH 4 VOC<br />

<strong>Oil</strong> 6,000 19,200 22.2 0.49 0.08 108 150 150<br />

2009 total hydrocarbon<br />

well testing emissions<br />

from UKCS offshore<br />

activities 1<br />

Anticipated well clean‐up<br />

& testing emissions as a %<br />

of the equivalent 2009<br />

UKCS emissions<br />

1 Source: EEMS 2009 data.<br />

3,931,850 3,022 113 219 10,300 15,706 11,394<br />

0.49 0.73 0.43 0.04 1.05 0.96 1.32<br />

Emissions from the well clean‐up and well test will be released approximately 225 km from the<br />

nearest coastline (UK). The prevailing winds from the south and southwest will carry the emissions<br />

away from the nearest coastline with very high dispersion and dilution of emissions occurring in the<br />

offshore environment (DTI, 2001).<br />

All relevant permits and consents (PON15B, OPPC and PPC) will be applied for to cover the clean‐up<br />

and well testing operations.<br />

Proposed control measures for impacts associated with emissions to air during the drilling phase<br />

Control measures to mitigate impacts from atmospheric emissions associated with drilling operations<br />

are presented below.<br />

5 ‐ 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!