24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Representing Domestic Violence Victims in Child Welfare Cases 87<br />

understand the pitfalls of this course of action, particularly the potential for<br />

removal of her children should another incident of violence occurs. An attorney<br />

for a mother in that situation should encourage her to develop a well thought-out<br />

safety plan that she can share with the CPS caseworker and to pursue an order<br />

of protection which, while allowing the parties to continue to live together,<br />

restrains the abuser from verbal or physical abuse against her and the child.<br />

An attorney may also provide information to, or advocate directly with,<br />

CPS as long as there is no pending Family <strong>Court</strong> case. The attorney should ask<br />

whether the caseworker intends to file in court or seek removal, so that the<br />

attorney may be present if such a filing occurs and may request a hearing before<br />

a removal. If the attorney believes that removal or any other legal action is<br />

forthcoming, the attorney may ask the caseworker to provide contact information<br />

for a CPS attorney. The mother’s attorney also may contact the CPS legal services<br />

unit directly. If removal or court action appears imminent, the attorney should<br />

notify the CPS legal services unit in writing that the attorney represents the<br />

mother and must be informed of any court filings.<br />

Procedural and Substantive Requirements for Removal<br />

The removal of a child from a parent is one of the most serious exercises<br />

of government power that our constitution permits. The <strong>Court</strong> of Appeals<br />

recognizes that “the liberty of a parent to supervise and rear a child” is one of<br />

the “[f]undamental constitutional principles of due process and protected<br />

privacy. . . .” 19 The <strong>Court</strong> also recognizes that it is in a child’s interest to be<br />

raised by his/her parent, and that relationship should not be interfered with<br />

absent grievous cause or necessity. 20 Thus, exacting procedural safeguards are<br />

applied when the government seeks removal.<br />

The law requires CPS to obtain a court order authorizing removal of a child.<br />

The only exception is when CPS determines that there is an imminent danger of<br />

serious injury to the children’s life or health and the risk of harm is so immediate<br />

that there is no time to obtain a court order. 21 The court must then hold a hearing<br />

prior to continuing the removal made without court order. 22 CPS also may file<br />

ex parte but must give the mother notice of its intention to do so and, again, a<br />

hearing must be held. Upon any application for removal, the court must determine<br />

whether reasonable efforts were made to eliminate the need for removal or, if<br />

such efforts were not made, whether the lack of such efforts was appropriate<br />

under the circumstances and whether an order of protection would ameliorate<br />

the danger. 23 At the conclusion of the hearing, the court may decline to order

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!