24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 Lisa Fischel-Wolovick<br />

of an order of protection. The Primary Aggressor Amendment as well as the<br />

resulting training for law enforcement has reduced the risk that battered women<br />

would be revictimized by the criminal justice system.<br />

Domestic Violence Intervention Act of 1994<br />

Combating domestic violence requires a collaborative effort among law<br />

enforcement, domestic violence advocates, and the courts, as well as public<br />

education and training of law enforcement personnel. The DVIA represents a<br />

comprehensive approach on the part of the Legislature, law enforcement and<br />

domestic violence advocates to criminalize domestic violence and provide for<br />

the safety of battered women. The DVIA also provides concurrent jurisdiction<br />

over family offenses, by providing battered women with access to the remedies<br />

from both Family and Criminal <strong>Court</strong>s. A battered woman may now elect to<br />

have her case heard in Family <strong>Court</strong>, which hears not only orders of protection<br />

but also issues of custody, visitation, child support, and violations of orders of<br />

protection, at the same time a criminal prosecution is being pursued. The new<br />

domestic violence legislation also provides Family <strong>Court</strong> judges with the<br />

discretion to transfer cases to the district attorney for prosecution. 5 Both<br />

provisions, while not foolproof, increase options for battered women.<br />

In New York, Bruno v Codd paved the way for the current reform domestic<br />

violence legislation. 6 This case was brought in part as a response to “. . . [the]<br />

frequent failure of officers of the New York City Police Department to respond<br />

to requests for safeguarding made by . . . a battered or threatened wife, . . .<br />

because of reluctance on the part of police to intervene in what they reflexively<br />

characterized as ‘domestic disputes’ rather than criminal offenses.” 7<br />

The argument that a mandated criminal response fails to empower battered<br />

women does not consider the conditions that existed prior to mandatory arrest and<br />

to a certain extent continue into the present, as well as the inclusive remedies in the<br />

DVIA. The remedies include not only mandatory arrest, but also concurrent<br />

jurisdiction over family offenses, training, collaboration and institutionalized<br />

tracking of domestic violence incidents in the form of the Domestic Incident Report.<br />

Following the enactment of the DVIA, the New York State Office of<br />

Domestic Violence Prevention conducted an extensive state-wide study of<br />

recidivism and the effectiveness of mandatory arrest over an eighteen month<br />

period. 8 This study reviewed over 13,000 incident reports from a total of eight<br />

sites across New York State, from communities ranging in size from 35,000 to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!