24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Victim Who Needs Child Support 159<br />

things as money received from life insurance policies, gifts, inheritances, lottery<br />

winnings, and personal injury recoveries.<br />

Reduction for Non-Custodial Parent with Little Income<br />

In enacting the CSSA, the legislature provided for a significant reduction of<br />

the child support required of a low-income noncustodial parent. While it may seem<br />

complicated at first, the basic premise is that, where the annual amount of the<br />

basic child support obligation would reduce a noncustodial parent’s income below<br />

the poverty level for one person, no more than $25 per month may be ordered.<br />

A similar protection, in the form of a maximum order, is provided to other<br />

noncustodial parents with slightly higher incomes. The statute provides that,<br />

where the annual amount of the basic child support obligation would reduce the<br />

noncustodial parent’s income below something called the “self-support reserve”<br />

(135% of the poverty level), the obligation will be $50 per month, or the<br />

difference between the noncustodial parent’s income and the self-support<br />

reserve, whichever is greater.<br />

Since these figures change each year, you are cautioned to keep up to date<br />

on the yearly changes in the poverty level.<br />

Factors for Rebutting the Presumption<br />

The amount established according to the formula creates a rebuttable<br />

presumption as to the appropriate amount of child support, and this amount<br />

must be ordered unless the court finds this amount to be unjust or inappropriate<br />

based upon consideration of certain factors. 19<br />

The argument most often raised by a custodial parent for deviating from the<br />

formula amount is contained in factor three: “the standard of living the child<br />

would have enjoyed had the marriage or household not been dissolved.” Under<br />

this factor, counsel may be able to increase child support by demonstrating that<br />

the obligor parent has the ability to provide support beyond the amount that<br />

could be ordered by straight application of the percentage to acknowledged<br />

income. Another factor, “the educational needs of either parent,” provides an<br />

opportunity for counsel to argue for a temporary increase in the amount if the<br />

client needs certain education to be able to adequately support the children. This<br />

may be particularly important for a client who is not married to the other parent<br />

and, for that reason, not eligible for spousal support to increase the amount of<br />

support available from the other parent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!