24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Matrimonial Actions 233<br />

Finally, only an order of protection requested pursuant to Domestic<br />

Relations Law § 252 can require that the party who is the object of the order<br />

pay reasonable counsel fees and disbursements incurred by a person protected<br />

by the order to obtain or enforce it. While this provision can be invoked by<br />

either the Family <strong>Court</strong> or the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> if a matrimonial action is<br />

pending, a Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justice will probably give a more generous award<br />

than a Family <strong>Court</strong> judge. In the same way that Family <strong>Court</strong> judges might be<br />

more liberal about issuing temporary orders of protection because they are more<br />

accustomed to them, a Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justice is likely to award more generous<br />

fees because counsel fee applications are more routine in that forum.<br />

<strong>Court</strong> Conferences and Referrals<br />

Parties in contested matrimonial actions are required to appear in court for<br />

preliminary conferences, compliance conferences, and pre-trial conferences.<br />

These conferences are often conducted outside of the formal courtroom in<br />

smaller rooms. This means that a victim of domestic violence may well be put<br />

in the position of sitting in very close proximity to her batterer. However,<br />

Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justices are becoming more sensitive to issues of domestic<br />

violence and may be amenable to an attorney’s request to waive the requirement<br />

of a victim’s presence during all conferences or, at a minimum, agree to conduct<br />

the conference in the courtroom with court officers present.<br />

When custody and visitation are disputed issues, the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> is relying<br />

more and more on court-employed social workers who meet simultaneously with<br />

both parties, court-sponsored parental education programs, parenting plans and<br />

mediation to assist in the resolution of these conflicts. Attorneys representing<br />

victims of domestic violence in custody and visitation disputes in Supreme<br />

<strong>Court</strong> should, with their client’s permission, promptly inform the court that their<br />

client is a victim of domestic violence. The court system acknowledges that<br />

mediation, parental education programs, parenting plans and meetings between<br />

both parties and a social worker are generally inappropriate and potentially<br />

dangerous where domestic violence has been present. The Office of the<br />

Statewide Administrative Judge for Matrimonial Matters provides regular<br />

training for matrimonial Supreme <strong>Court</strong> justices, which counsels judges not to<br />

make referrals to such programs when the existence of domestic violence is<br />

brought to their attention.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!