24.03.2013 Views

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

Lawyers Manual - Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and Abused Mothers 133<br />

How Does a Party Bring a Hague Convention Claim?<br />

A parent seeking the return of an abducted child may make an application<br />

directly to a court in the Contracting State to which the child has been taken. The<br />

parent may also submit an application to the Central Authority in his or her own<br />

country, which then forwards the application to the Central Authority in the<br />

abducted-to country. These options are not mutually exclusive, so a party seeking<br />

return of a child under the Hague Convention may use both avenues of relief.<br />

What are the Elements of a Hague Convention Claim?<br />

Wrongful Removal<br />

To make out a prima facie case under the Hague Convention in the<br />

United States, the parent seeking return of the child must first establish, by a<br />

preponderance of the evidence, that there was a “wrongful removal.” A<br />

wrongful removal occurs if the child was taken from his or her habitual<br />

residence in breach of the other parent’s custodial rights that were being<br />

exercised at the time of removal.<br />

Habitual Residence<br />

The Hague Convention does not define what constitutes “habitual<br />

residence,” and courts have developed this concept through caselaw. Habitual<br />

residence, unlike domicile, does not necessarily depend on the long-term<br />

intentions of the parties but is a concept used to identify where the children and<br />

family are settled. As one court stated, habitual residence depends on “a ‘degree<br />

of settled purpose,’ as evidenced by the child’s circumstances in that place and<br />

the shared intentions of the parents regarding their child’s presence there. The<br />

focus is on the child rather than the parents.” 6 Another court, explaining the<br />

concept of habitual residence, stated that “technically, habitual residence can be<br />

established after only one day as long as there is some evidence that the child<br />

has become ‘settled’ into the location in question.” 7<br />

Rights of Custody<br />

Wrongful removal occurs only if the child was taken from his or her<br />

habitual residence in breach of the other parent’s custodial rights, which were<br />

being exercised at the time of removal. The Hague Convention defines rights<br />

of custody as “rights relating to the care of the person of the child and, in<br />

particular, the right to determine the child’s place of residence.” 8 This term was<br />

intended by the Convention drafters to be interpreted broadly. For more<br />

specificity on what constitutes custody rights, it is important to look to the laws<br />

of the child’s country of habitual residence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!